ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IA No.1/2013 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1198 OF 2005
S.P. DUDEJA & ORS. Appellant (s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for directions and office report )
WITH IA Nos. 4 and 5 IN W.P(C) NO. 385 of 2010
(For appropriate orders/directions and stay and With office report)
Date: 11/07/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
For Appellant(s) Mr. A.K.Ganguly,Sr.Adv.
Mr. J.K.Das,Adv.
Mr. S.K.Das,Adv.
Mr. Avijit Bhujabal,Adv.
Mr. P.P.Nayak,Adv.
Mr. D.M.Sharma,Adv.
Mr. Parmanand Gaur,Adv.
Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh,Adv.
Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv.
Mr. Ashwani Garg,Adv.
Mr. Avirul Saxena,Adv.
Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.
Ms. Seema T.,Adv.
Mr. Manish Kumar Vikkey,Adv.
Mr. B.K.Prasad,Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.
-2-
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
In IA No.1 in C.A.No. 1198/2005
Heard Mr. A.K. Ganguly, learned senior counsel in
support of I.A.No.1/2013.
In our view, the applicants seek almost a review of
the order dated 3rd August, 2011 passed by this Court and we do
not see any reason to interfere with the said order. We are of
the view that it will be reopening the entire case. We are,
therefore, not inclined to entertain this application. It is
accordingly dismissed.
Mr. Ganguly, however, states that the applicants may
avail of their remedy by approaching the Administrative Tribunal.
If they do so, the Tribunal will look into the matter on its own
merits.
In IA Nos. 4&5 IN W.P.(C) No. 385/2010
Heard Mr. V.Giri, learned senior counsel in support
of these I.As. He states that the applicants would like to make
fresh representation to the Union of India and in the event the
petitioners are aggrieved by the decision thereon, they make take
appropriate recourse. After making this statement, Mr.
Giri prays for withdrawal of these I.As. These are accordingly
dismissed as withdrawn.
-2-
If any representation is made, we expect the
respondents to look into it expeditiously, preferably within 8
weeks from the receipt thereof. The decision will be taken after
considering the merits of the submissions of the petitioners.
[SUMAN WADHWA] [SNEH LATA SHARMA]
AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER
