" IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF AIACEGEO. THIS IS THE ONLY ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERINTENDENTS OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE THROUGH OUT THE COUNTRY . President Mr.T.Dass and SG Mr. Harpal Singh.

Tuesday 22 April 2014

Gazetted Officer

GAZETTED OFFICER is a higher level ranked public servant and authority for the “Gazetted officer” stamp is granted by President of India or Governor of the States or Union Territories. These officers in the Central Government are entrusted with some supervisory and managerial role. However the public conceives a Gazetted Officer only as an attesting authority. The Central civil Group ‘B’ services are the second level of command structure among the broad categories of central civil services. Some of them are regular group ‘B’ services and others isolated posts in Group ‘B’ scales of pay. The recruitment to Group’B’ service is generally through a mixture of direct recruitment and promotions. There were no group ‘B’ services in the Government of India till the year 1930. There is no uniform promotional / classification policies, the Group ‘B’ /Group ‘A’ divisions in Gazetted services. Further on the functional and responsibility there is not much difference and posts are interchangeable. Therefore there is a need for reexamination of distinction of Group A and Group B posts. The Gazetted posts can be restructured into four grades with automatic movement from one grade to another.  The direct recruitment as well as recruitment through promotions to the Gazetted services should be in the same ratio in all the departments, without any restriction of age limit or on the consideration of ‘merit’. In the Government Service, there should only two groups namely Gazetted & Non Gazetted. The Share for induction in the officer cadre from Non Gazetted should be 80% Further, the ratio should be based on the number of sanctioned posts and not on vacancy. This will ensure adequate recognition for experience and will usher in good governance. Currently, the career progression of the various Group ‘B’ services is quite variable. Some of     the Group ‘B’ services, as for example, in the Income Tax department and Central Excise Dept, are feeder services to the corresponding Group ‘A’ services.  Others, like the Central Secretariat service, Railway Board secretariat service, armed force Head quarters service etc have chances of promotions in their offices and some of them have even reached the level of Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary, and Secretary. Some Group ‘B’ services are feeder to the All India Services, for example The Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar civil services and the Delhi Andaman and Nicobar police service. There are other Group ‘B’ services which are not so fortunate and face prolonged stagnation. Job pattern of Group B officers and those at the entry level in Group A, in almost all the Government Departments, are very similar and there could be hardly any reason, except the legacy of India’s colonial past, for persisting with two classes of officers in the Government. (During the days of British Raj, these two classes were for differentiating between White & Brown Sahibs). Such a division has no place in Independent India. It only instills sense of class difference in the officer’s cadre, which thoroughly demoralizes the officers at cutting edge level, striking a fatal blow at the very roots of quality governance. The Hon’ble Commission may, therefore, recommend to the Government to have only two cadres viz.  Gazetted and Non-Gazetted. VI CPC observed that “the Government has never conceded the principle of parity between Central Secretariat Service with other ministerial Services. Hence the 6thCentral Pay commission has been never considered our view points. On the Contrary it created lot of anomalous situations in the Group B cadre. Because of the merger of the cadres the Gazetted Group B is suffocated between Group C and Group A. Career Progression for Group B was not at all considered. The Minimum wage for a Gazetted Group B was also not considered. The concept of running a decent and a reasonable living wage for Gazetted Group B was never thought of by these pay commissions. Gazette notification of government decision on 6 CPC recommendations offered bigger Bonanza to Group ‘A’ cadre only. The Grade Pay has been upwardly revised at ten stages in favour of Gr ‘A’ officers, but not a single upgrade revision, not even the anomalies pointed out in the construction of Pay Bands, have taken place in the case of PB 2. For Senior Group A officers, another Pay Scale has been created called HAG+ (Higher Administrative Grade). The creation of pay scale 75500-80000 (not pay band) for HAG+ itself negated the argument that pay commission recommendation on pay bands were sacrosanct and there could not be any modifications in the pay scales. As regards Gazetted Officers Group B many posts have been merged with same Grade Pay without any extra financial benefit. A Scheme for joint consultation with the organizations of Government servants on the pattern of the Whitely Machinery in the U.K. was recommended by the Second Pay Commission (1959). The Scheme was introduced in 1966 with the object of promoting harmonious relations and of securing the greatest measure of cooperation between the Government, in its capacity as employer, and its employees in matters of common concern, and with the object, further, of increasing the efficiency of the public service. It broadly covers over 95% of the regular civil employees of the Central Government including industrial employees working in departmentally run undertakings like the Railways and the Workshops/Production Units of various Ministries. The Scheme is a voluntary one, and the Government as well as the Staff Associations/Unions participating in the Scheme is required to subscribe to a Declaration of Joint Intent which inter alia provides for abjuration of agitational methods by the Staff Unions/Associations for redressal of their grievances. The Scheme covers all regular civil employees of the Central Government, except: (A) the Class I services; (B) the Class II services, other than the Central Secretariat Services and the other comparable services in the headquarters organization of the Government; (C) the persons in industrial establishments employed mainly in managerial or administrative capacity, and those who being employed in supervisory capacity employees of the Union Territories; and (D) police personnel. More than five decades have gone since then and the issues concerning the Gazetted Officers especially the middle-management cadres continued to mount in the absence of“Grievance Redressal” machinery. The impact of such a gross neglect has been accelerating despite the advent of successive pay commissions and almost reached a level that no more bearable.  The question whether the JCM scheme has been successful in India in terms of non gazette employees of Government of India is debatable the fact remains that the non-gazetted employees could atleast redress their grievances before the JCM and many a times could achieve some tangible results either through meaningful negotiation with National Council or through Arbitration wherever the disagreement is reached notwithstanding the fact it that the  award delivered by the Arbitration Board is subject to the authority of parliament to modify/reject on grounds of national economy/social justice. It has been our experience with the successive pay commissions that we have been treated as ministerial staff and sometimes even lower. Our representations to the Departmental Heads to the pay commissions, to the Ministry and every authority concerned have been simply ignored or rejected off hand without any justification. The sixth Pay Commission is no exception. It has in fact added insult to injury by deliberately denying even the minimum benefit to the Gazetted Officers including MACP. A culture of human exploitation and disrespect for the law prevails, and we are expected to discharge our public service at cheaper cost to enable certain people to pocket extra profit. Disrespect for human beings is in the DNA of the current system. While slavery is, of course, the most extreme situation in the field level offices, the truth is that the Gazetted and Promotee officers are being ruthlessly over loaded. Our Officers perform backbreaking work, at  very low pay scales; and virtually no protection to their self-respect exists. Historically these Gazetted Officers have been and continue to be excluded from Indian fair labour standards and are prevented from associating themselves. The cruelty of modern-day slavery prevailing in the Departments have motivated our officers to continue fighting for their rights, prompting the Government agencies to support our demands that include better pay scales and working conditions and new environment. Pay commissions have been viewed, or at least portrayed, as a stable watch dog of our economy, looking out for everyone’s good like a kind of gentle Big Brother. Any one attacking these Commissions’ Reports particularly the members of the Association, have been dismissed as crazy people. We wouldn’t survive without the Pay Commissions, is what most of our Gazetted officers believe. What we fail to see is the reality that the door to the Pay Commission is a revolving one working at the behest of the Finance Ministry of India. What we did not see is that the Pay commission is a ruling class agency that manufactures policy in the interests of that class. Our job now is to unite every resource available and put every shoulder to the wheel and assert ourselves. A strong united movement of Gazetted officers serving in the Central Government alone can change the status of the Gazetted Officers and render Justice.  Our thirst for justice has remained unquenched for five decades. In fact it has been deliberately allowed to be aggravated by repeated injustice by the Pay Commissions and by the Authorities who seem to have taken upon themselves the task of suppressing us further and further in to virtual slavery. Our thirst for justice is real, acute and painful. We can quench our thirst with a fair deal only when we, every one of us, establish emphatically that we are capable of sustained struggle. Our thirst will be quenched when every one of us demonstrate that “it is nobler to take arms against the sea of troubles and by opposing end them”