" IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF AIACEGEO. THIS IS THE ONLY ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERINTENDENTS OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE THROUGH OUT THE COUNTRY . President Mr.T.Dass and SG Mr. Harpal Singh.

Wednesday 1 January 2014

REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED TO SECRETARY ( REVENUE) ON 01.01.2014 BY AIACEGEO.

ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:                                          Address for communication:                           Secretary General:
Lokanath Mishra                        240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.)                                  Ravi Malik
Mob. 09437314941                     mail Id: ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.comMob. 09868816290
Vice Presidents: SampatRai, VatanKamble (Central); Anurag Chaudhary, Ravi Joshi (North); A. Ravinder Singh, Rajan G. George (South); A. S. Roy, Shubhrangshu Deb (East); P. D. Nimhan, S. K. Jha (West)
Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, LaxmiLalSinghvi (Central); N. N. Lal, R. K. Solanki (North); G. Srinath, S. Chandrasekar (South); AshwiniMajhi, V. N. Jha (East); G. K. Jhala, M. K. Misra (West)
Office Secretary: C.S.Sharma (Mob. 09313885411)             Treasurer: N.R.Manda (Mob. 09871483585)
(Recognised by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 02/NFFU/14                                                                          Dt. 01.01.14
To,                  
Sh. Sumit Bose,
            The Secretary, Finance & Revenue,
            North Block, New Delhi.
Sub: Batch to batch Non Functional Financial Upgradation to the Central Excise executive officers at par with the counterparts of CSS.
Sir,
It is submitted with due regards that all the organised group ‘A’ officers recruited with IAS, the best placed group ‘A’ service, in the same pay scale through common entry examination conducted by UPSC have been granted financial parity with the counterparts of IAS. They have been granted non-functional up-gradation vide DOPT OM No. AB.14017/64/2008-Estt.(RR) dt.24.04.09 to compensate the lack of promotions as compared to IAS.
2. It is further submitted that the CSS officers are the best placed group ‘B’ officers of Govt. of India like IAS in group ‘A’. The group ‘B’ officers at the level of Inspector of Central Excise and the Assistant of CSS are recruited in a common scale of paythrough common entry examination conducted by SSC. The officers recruited as Assistant (Group-B, Non Gazetted) in the Ministries get the benefit of promotions upto the Joint Secretary level, i.e.,i) SO with GP of Rs.5400/- in PB3 after 4 years of service, ii) US(Grade-I) with GP ofRs.6600/-, iii) DS with GP ofRs. 7600/-, iv) Director with GP ofRs. 8700/- in PB-4 and v) JS with GP ofRs. 10000/-. However, their counterpart Inspectors of Central Excise in CBEC recruited as Group-B (Non Gazetted) through the same All India competitive examination get only one promotion in 35/40 years of service career. If the Assistants/Section Officers are working in the headquarters offices on policy making seats, the Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are also working on more important seats of revenue collection in the field formations. Despite of working on more important seats, the Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are not treated at par with the counterparts of CSS. These CSS counterparts are retiring 4-5 grades above the officers recruited as the Inspector of Central Excise. On account of this, the CSS counterparts are getting 60% more pay than the officers recruited as Inspector of Central Excise. Even the pension of CSS counterparts is more than the salary of the officers recruited as Inspector of Central Excise. The Inspectors of Central Excise are recruited in PB2 and also retire on a PB2 post of Superintendent barring around 1% while all of their common entry counterparts of CSS easily reach PB4 levels after being recruited with them in PB2 through the same examination with same eligible conditions. It is also worth to submit that the revenue officers are highly placed throughout the world in the matter of salary, perks and career prospects as compared to other employees but, very unfortunately, our officers are facing the ever worst prospects in each & every matter.  
3. The group ‘A’ officers in the Ministries are selected under Central Staffing Scheme on deputation basis from organized Group ‘A’ Services or from CSS officers being promoted from the post of Assistant/Section Officer but no such opportunity is available for the Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise who are not only looking after the work relating to collection of Central Excise duty but also looking after the work of collection of Customs duty (including Inland Air Travel Tax and Foreign Travel Tax) and Service Tax. Needless to mention that they are already earning the major portion of the govt. revenues. It is also worth to mention that the Govt. of India has regularly been earning the revenue far ahead of the revenue target in r/o of Central Excise duty, Customs duty and Service Tax particularly due to the efficient, committed & effective efforts of the workforce of CBEC in the form of Central Excise Inspectors/Superintendents.
4. Above facts very well manifest the injustice meted out to officers recruited as Central Excise Inspector despite of the most important work of revenue collection being done by them for govt. During this course, they have been facing every threat including life & person of them as well as their families by the hard core criminals, smugglers and white collared criminalsalongwith tremendous administrative pressures. Thus, the officers recruited as the Inspector of Central Excise deserve a far better treatment in every aspect including pay, perks and career prospects. The grant of the non-functional financial upgradation on batch to batch basis in the grade of common entry counterparts of CSS on the lines of granting the non-functional upgradationto all Group ‘A’ officers at par with IAS may really be a solace for these hard working Central Excise officers.
5. The Association was assured of the necessary action by the Member (P&V) in r/o granting non-functional financial upgradation at par with CSS during the meeting of 02.11.12.The issue was raised again vide point No. 15 in the meeting of 31.01.13 and she was again pleased to assure the Association of necessary action but the decision on this point, however, was mentioned in the minutes as a technical matter to be examined vide No.C.30013/6/2012-Ad.IV.A. Dt. 15.02.13 of CBEC.No need to repeat that the Central Excise Superintendents have been facing continuous acute stagnation for decades.  Out of more than 11500 Central Excise Superintendents, around 10000 are already eligible for promotion to group ‘A’ having rendered more qualifying service than required for promotion.
6. As far as the importance of the responsibilities is concerned, the Superintendents are discharging all functions relating to assessment, investigation& intelligence, issuing of Show Cause Noticewith the powers of adjudication. They have not only been conferred with the judicial powers in the matter of adjudication but also been conferred with the judicial powers of recording statements of various persons in terms of Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962.  The statements tendered before the Central Excise Superintendent have a legal binding and are treated as a valid piece of evidence by various courts including the Hon’ble Supreme Court just like the statements tendered before a Magistrate. No such powers have been conferred to the CSS officers or any other counterparts of Central Excise Superintendents/Inspectors. It is also important to mention that the judicial officers are not only already being highly paid with extra perks but also treated in a far better way in the matter of career prospects than our Superintendents in our country.Though the Central Excise Superintendents are performing more responsible work functions as compared to other common entry counterparts yet they are facing the worst career prospects instead of being given better treatment. They are being maltreated despite of being the ‘backbone of the government revenue’ on account of being the major revenue collectors for the government in the form of Central Excise duty, Customs duty and Service Tax and also GST in the forthcoming times. In the actual terms, they are the ‘backbone of the government’ on account of being responsible to earn the finance for the government but are being totally ignored in every matter.
7. In view of above, it is requested that the officers recruited as Inspector/Superintendent of Central Excise (direct as well aspromotee) may kindly be granted at least non-functional financial upgradation at par with their counterparts of CSS on batch to batch basis enabling them to retire in PB4 like their counterparts too.
Thanking you,        
Yours faithfully,


 (RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.


ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:                                       Address for communication:                                  Secretary General:
Lokanath Mishra                        240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.)                                      Ravi Malik
Mob. 09437314941                      mail Id: ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.comMob. 09868816290
Vice Presidents: SampatRai, VatanKamble (Central); Anurag Chaudhary, Ravi Joshi (North); A. Ravinder Singh, Rajan G. George (South); A. S. Roy, Shubhrangshu Deb (East); P. D. Nimhan, S. K. Jha (West)
Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, LaxmiLalSinghvi (Central); N. N. Lal, R. K. Solanki (North); G. Srinath, S. Chandrasekar (South); AshwiniMajhi, V. N. Jha (East); G. K. Jhala, M. K. Misra (West)
Office Secretary: C.S.Sharma (Mob. 09313885411)             Treasurer: N.R.Manda (Mob. 09871483585)
(Recognised by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 01/P/14                                                                          Dt. 01.01.14
To,                  
Sh. Sumit Bose,
            The Secretary, Finance & Revenue,
            North Block, New Delhi.
Sub: Parity with the best placed counterparts like CSS etc.
Sir,
Kindly refer to theRef. No. 280/P/13 Dt. 17.10.13 of the Association alongwith various other communications.
            2. It is submitted with due regards that our officers are retiringat a PB2 postonly with single promotion in the career of 35-40 years after enteringthe job as Inspector of Central Excise while our counterparts of CSS, CSSS, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, CBDT etc. are easily attaining the PB4 levels after getting 5/6 promotions despite of our officers being the backbone of the government on account of earning the major portion of the government revenue in the course of discharging the executive and quasi-judicial duties taking every risk on life of self as well as family on account of interacting with the white collared criminals & hardcore smugglers.
            3. The government is adopting every measure to bring parity, whether functional or non-functional, among common entry group ‘A’ officers but no such measures are being taken for group ‘B’ officers. The IRS officers of CBEC got the parity with their common entry counterparts of CBDT in the last cadre restructuring. They are also expected to get parity with other better placed group ‘A’ common entry counterparts in the ongoing cadre restructuring. Every effort is also made to promote group ‘A’ officers within qualifying service but no such effort is ever made to promote Central Excise group ‘B’ executive officers in consonance of DOPT guidelines. 
4. On account of no efforts being made to bring group ‘B’ common entry counterparts at par, there is huge discriminatory disparity between Central Excise group ‘B’ executive officers and other counterparts. As a result, the counterparts of CSS, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, CBDT etc. are reaching the level of Joint Secretary & Commissioner while Central Excise group ‘B’ executive officers are forced to retire as Superintendent after single promotion only barring 1%. This has made a huge discriminatory difference between their salaries, pension and other pre/post-retirement benefits. The ongoing cadre restructuring of CBEC shall also not be able to undo the continuous discrimination being made to the Central Excise group ‘B’ executive officers. Only around 1% of them will merely be able to enter into junior group ‘A’ at the fag end of the career on regular basis like in the past as a result of ongoing cadre restructuring because the rest of the posts of Asstt. Commissioner (JTS level) have been created on temporary basis only for 5 years with the condition that the officers promoted against these posts would not be eligible for further promotion.
5. In view of the above, it is necessary to take some concrete steps independent of cadre restructuring to bringCentral Excise group ‘B’ executive officers at par with their best placed common entry counterparts of CSS etc. on the lines of group ‘A’ in the interest of the govt. revenue. The parity (functional or even non-functional) with their common entry counterparts is very well possible by adopting the measures like below-
a) Time bound promotions/scales (time scales after every 7 years for these officers were also recommended by CBEC to 6th CPC vide F.No.A.26017/147 /06-Ad.II.A Dt. 04.01.07 as one of the measures but the same is now being back tracked). No posts will be required to be created for the grant of time scale after every 7 years.
b) Notional promotions granting batch to batch parity with the best placed common entry counterparts like CSS etc.
c) Creation of supernumerary posts which will be personal to the officer at each level of the promotion and will be abolished with the retirement of the officer.
d) Creation of separate service (it was also recommended by CBEC to 6th CPC vide F.No.A.26017/147 /06-Ad.II.A Dt. 04.01.07 as one of the measures but now it is also being back tracked). The draft RR’s for separate service have already been submitted to the CBEC by the Association and are enclosed herewith also. The separate service for group ‘B’ officers has also been recommended on various occasions by the CBEC and also by the IRS Officers Association but no initiative has been taken till date. This may now be created by taking into consideration all of the vacant posts (after implementation of cadre restructuring) at group ‘A’ level+half of STS posts+half of JTS regular posts by upgrading these to STS+all of temporary JTS posts (instead of abolishing after 5 years) by upgrading these to STS with the provision of promoting Superintendents directly to STS+some additional posts etc.
e) Direct promotion to higher post/s (Customs Ministerial officers are being promoted to the post of Customs Appraiser without working even for a single day on the feeder post of Customs Examiner in CBEC. Likewise, our officers may also kindly be granted parity with the best placed common entry counterparts by promoting them directly to the higher posts).
f) In-situ promotions (requiring no creation of posts).
g) Batch to batch functional upgradation at par with the best placed common entry counterparts like CSS etc.
h) Batch to batch non-functional upgradation at par with the best placed common entry counterparts like CSS etc. (also requiring no creation of posts) based on the precedent of DOPT OM No. AB.14017/64/2008-Estt.(RR) dt. 24.04.09 granting NFU to other group ‘A’ officers at par with IAS.
i) Re-framing the recruitment rules prescribing the qualifying service in consonance of the DOPT OM No. AB-14017/61/2008-Estt.(RR) dt. 24.03.09without trifurcating the cadre at group ‘B’ non-gazetted&group ‘B’ gazetted level. This OM stipulates the promotion of the grade of Inspector to the grade of Joint Commissioner, Additional Commissioner & Commissioner after completion of 12, 17 & 20 years of service respectively. The validity of this OM was also not questioned by CBEC during the presentation of cadre restructuring proposal on 18.01.11 but CBEC showed its inability to implement the same due to the want of the required number of vacancies/posts. In the case ofthe want of the required number of vacancies/posts (if CBEC is unable to create the same), the officers may kindly be granted in-situ promotions after completion of the prescribed service (also requiring no creation of posts) independent of cadre restructuring. A little deviation from the above mentioned DOPT guidelines may be understood but the non-implementation of the guidelines at all is never understandable. If the CBEC is unable to give us the prescribed grade within 20 years, we may be granted the same after completion of 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 or even 30 years (after completion of one & half times of qualifying service based on the precedent of CSS where all the Section Officers were promoted to the post of Under Secretary after completion of one & half times of qualifying service in 1999).
6. Keeping in view the above submissions, it is requested that the due steps may kindly be taken independent of cadre restructuring to devise the specific scheme (by means of functional or non-functional upgradation) for bringing the Central Excise group ‘B’ executive officers at par with their best placed common entry counterparts like CSS etc.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above (Draft RR’s).
 (RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.