MEMORANDUM
Before
The Study Group
On
Extraordinarily Acute
Stagnation
for
Superintendents of
Central Excise
OUTLINES OF MEMORANDUM
PART-I:
ABOUT THE DEPARTMENT
PART-II: THE
CADRE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX
PART-III: APPEAL FOR REMOVAL OF
EXTRAOERDINARILY ACUTE STAGNATION EXISTING IN THE CADRE OF CENTRAL EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT
(1) FRAMING OF RECRUITMENT
RULES
(2) DIRECT PROMOTION TO STS POST
(3) INTRA ORGANISATIONAL PARITY
(4) INTRA DEPARTMENTAL PARITY
(5) INETR DEPARTMENTAL PARITY
(6) MERGER OF
THREE GROUP ‘B’ EXECUTIVE NON GAZETTED AND ALSO GROUP ‘B’ EXECUTIVE GAZETTED
STREAMS INTO ONE
(7) TIMELY CONDUCTION OF DPC
(8) REGULARISATION OF AD HOC PROMOTIONS
(9) INTRODUCTION OF FLEXIBLE
PROMOTION/COMPLEMENTING SCHEME
(10) BATCH TO BATCH NON FUNCTIONAL FINANCIAL
UPGRADATION TO THE CENTRAL EXCISE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AT PAR WITH THE BEST
PLACED COUNTERPARTS OF CSS ETC.
(11) PROMOTING ALL THE SUPERINTENDENTS WHO HAVE COMPLETED 1½ TIMES OF
QUALIFYING SERVICE ON THE LINES OF CSS
(12) ENHANCEMENT OF PERCENTAGE OF PROMOTION QUOTA FROM 50% TO AT LEAST 90%
IN GROUP A RECRUITMENT RULES
(13) UNIFORM PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY
(14)
TIMELY CADRE RESTRUCTURINGS
(15)
AT LEAST FIVE FUNCTIONAL PROMOTIONS
(16) TIME SCALE AFTER EVERY 7 YEARS
(17) CREATION OF LEAVE RESERVE POSTS
(18) REMOVAL OF REGIONAL DISPARITIES
PART-I
ABOUT
THE DEPARTMENT
The Ministry of Finance is
responsible for the administration of the finance of the Central Government. It
is concerned with all economic and financial matters affecting the country as a
whole including mobility of resources for development. It regulates the
expenditure of the Central Government including the transfer of resources to
States. The Ministry comprises five Departments namely:
(a)
Department of Economic Affairs;
(b)
Department of Expenditure;
(c)
Department of Revenue;
(d)
Department of Disinvestment and
(e)
Department of Financial Services.
2. The Department of Revenue
exercises control on the matters relating to all direct and indirect taxes of
the Union of India through two statutory Boards namely the Central Board of Excise
and Customs (CBEC) and Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). Matters relating
to levy and collection of Central Excise duty, Service Tax & Customs duty
and control over Narcotics fall within the purview of the CBEC, whereas those
relating to the levy & collection of direct taxes are under the purview of
the CBDT.
3. During 1963, the combined
Board namely Board of Revenue was divided into CBEC and CBDT under the Central
Board of Revenue Act, 1963. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC)
deals with the task of formulation of policies concerning levy and collection
of Customs & Central Excise duties and Service Tax, prevention of smuggling
and administration & control of matters relating to Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax,
Narcotics, enforcement matters, economic intelligence, revenue intelligence,
Central Excise & Service Tax intelligence, export promotion etc. It heads
the organisations like Central Intelligence Economic Bureau, Central Bureau of
Narcotics, formations for Control on Factories, formations for Adjudication
& Review, National Academy of Customs, Excise & Narcotics, Directorate
General of Revenue Intelligence, Directorate General of Central Excise
Intelligence, Directorate General of Inspection, Directorate General of Systems & Data
Management, Directorate General of Vigilance, Directorate General of Service
Tax, Directorate General of Audit, Directorate General of Export Promotion,
Directorate General of Safeguards, Directorate General of Valuation,
Directorate General of Human Resource Development, Directorate of Data
Management, Directorate of Logistics, Directorate of Legal Affairs, Directorate
of Publicity & Public Relations, Large Tax Payer Units, Indirect Tax
Ombudsmen, various field formations of Central Excise, Customs & Service
Tax, Central Revenue Control Laboratory etc.
4. During financial year 2012-13,
the indirect tax revenue collection was Rs. 4,74,575 crore . This indicates a
growth of 20.9 % over actual collections in 2011-12 despite of general economic
slowdown and relatively low level of
industrial output in 2012-13.This increase was possible because of the dedicated
& committed efforts made by all the Superintendents of Central Excise,
Customs and Service Tax posted throughout the country. The major head wise
details of indirect tax revenue collections during 2012-13 are tabulated
below:
Major
Tax
Head |
B.E
2012-13 |
R.E
2012-13 |
Actuals
2012-13 (prov.)
|
Growth
over 2011 - 12 |
Collection
over BE |
Collection
over RE |
Customs
|
186694
|
164853
|
165289
|
10.7%
|
88.5%
|
100.3%
|
Union Excise
|
194350
|
171996
|
176685
|
21.3%
|
90.9%
|
102.7%
|
Service Tax
|
124000
|
132697
|
132601
|
36.0%
|
106.9%
|
99.9%
|
Total
|
505044
|
469546
|
474575
|
20.9%
|
94.0%
|
101
. 1%
|
5. Revenue Trends
in 2013-14 (April-December): The Budget Estimate (BE) for 2013-14 for
indirect tax has been pegged at Rs. 5,65,003 crore, which is about
19.0% higher than the revenue receipts of previous year. The major head wise
details of indirect tax revenue collection during 2013-14 fiscal year upto
December, 2013 is tabulated as under-
|
Indirect Tax Major Head
|
Budget Estimate
2013-14
|
Revenue
Collections
*April to
December 2013
|
|||
2012-13
|
2013-14
|
Growth
(in %)
|
%BE
Achieved (Up-to |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec,2013)
|
|
Customs
|
187308
|
118393
|
126285
|
6.7
|
67.4
|
|
Central Excise
|
197554
|
124016
|
118405
|
(-)4.5
|
59.9
|
|
Service Tax
|
180141
|
91900
|
110313
|
20.0
|
61.2
|
|
Total
|
565003
|
334309
|
355003
|
6.2
|
62.8
|
6. Voluntary
Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 (VCES): In Service Tax, a new scheme
was introduced to encourage voluntary compliance with the following main
features:
(i)The
scheme can be availed by non-filers or stop-filers or persons who have not made
a truthful declaration in their return. However, it will
not be applicable to persons against whom any
inquiry or investigation is pending by the issue of search warrant or summon or
by way of audit;
(ii)The
defaulter will be required to make a truthful declaration of all his pending
tax dues (from 1st October,
2007 to 31st December, 2012) and pay at least half of it before 31st
December, 2013 and remaining half to be paid by:
(a) 30th June, 2014 without interest; or
(b) By 31st
December, 2014 with interest from 1st July, 2014 onwards;
(iii)
On compliance with all the requirements, the person will have immunity from
interest (as specified), penalties and other proceedings.
7. Arrests and
Prosecutions: Section 104 of the Customs Act, 1962 contains provisions
relating to arrest. This section has been amended to make certain offences
punishable under section 135 as non-bailable.
The offences are:
(A) Evasion or
attempted evasion of duty exceeding rupees fifty lakh;
(B) Clearance
of prohibited goods notified under section 11 which are also notified under
sub-clause (C) of clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 135;
(C) Import or
Export of any goods which have not been declared in accordance with the
provisions of this
Act and the market price of which exceeds rupees one crore;
(D) Fraudulently
availing of or attempt to avail of drawback or any exemption from duty provided
under this Act, if
the amount of drawback or exemption from duty exceeds rupees fifty lakh.
7.1 Barring the offences mentioned above, all other
offences under the Customs Act are bailable. Similar
changes have been made in the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Finance Act, 1994
(relating to Service Tax).
8. Anti-Smuggling
Unit: The Anti-Smuggling Unit (AS Unit) of CBEC
provides an enabling environment to officers working in DRI (Directorate of
Revenue Intelligence), DGCEI (Directorate General of Central Excise
Intelligence) and other field formations of CBEC
by providing anti-smuggling equipments, vehicles, updated policy guidelines and
procedures regarding operations to detect and curb evasion of Central Excise
duty, Service Tax & Customs duty, frauds relating to revenue evasion and
augmenting Govt. revenue. In the financial year 2013-14 (upto Sept, 2013), the following
achievements were made and initiatives taken by the Anti-Smuggling Unit-
a) To curb
duty evasion on overseas, India has signed Customs Mutual Assistance Agreements
(CMAAs) and Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with other countries for sharing
of intelligence and
availing investigation assistance. The Customs Overseas Intelligence Network (COIN) provides actionable
intelligence for facilitating seizures of offending goods and to detect evasion of Customs duty. COIN also
utilises the platform provided through CMAAs/MoUs to obtain documentary evidences in
this regard. Presently nine COIN units are operational abroad. Efforts are being made to create
seven more COIN units in consultation with Ministry of External Affairs.
b) The
Directorate General of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), interalia, disseminates information
about new modus
operandi of duty evaders and smugglers by sharing details of important cases booked by it through issue
of alert circulars. The alert circulars are also used for targeting in the Risk Management Framework.
The field formations and DRI also share the information /intelligence and details of cases
with other agencies directly as well as by reporting to the Central Economic Intelligence
Bureau (CEIB) and at the meetings of Regional
Economic Intelligence Council (REIC). Policy directions issued by the Finance Minister in the Economic
Intelligence Council
(EIC) meetings are circulated by Anti-Smuggling Unit to DRI, DGCEI and field formations for compliance.
c) The
National Import Data Base (NIDB) and Export Commodity Data Base (ECDB) help in detecting
under-valuation/misdeclaration of imported/exported goods, which are reported
to be the oft-used
route for Customs commercial frauds and Trade Based Money Laundering (TBML). The Intelligence Support System
(ISS) developed by DRI generates workable intelligence by analysing macro-level inputs
which helps in detection of commercial frauds, evasion of Customs duty and misuse of export
incentives. Trends in smuggling report are issued from time to time for the guidance of the field
formations.
d) The list of
sensitive commodities prone to smuggling are circulated to field formations on
the basis of the cases
detected in the past. These include Narcotics & other Psychotropic
Substances, Gold, FICN,
Red Sanders and Memory Cards etc. The major commodities prone to the evasion in terms of commercial frauds are
Betel Nuts, Parts & Accessories, Non Edible Crude Palm Oil, Iron Ore Concentrate,
Aircrafts, Cigarettes, Ozone Depleting Substances (R-22 Gas), Garments &
Accessories etc.
e) As part of
the institutional support for the field formations, revised Arrest Guidelines have been issued,
Annual Action Plan for acquisition of anti-smuggling equipments has been prepared, the norms for
weapon requirement for field formations have been finalised and Indian Customs Canine Squad
Manual for a Sniffer Dog Establishment has been issued.
9. Anti-Smuggling
Performance at a Glance: Supported with the above logistics
and institutional support, the DRI and field formations of CBEC have performed
well. The results achieved include details of
seizures made, commercial fraud cases detected, persons arrested and persons
detained by Customs authorities. These are the major achievements
by all Superintendents of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax posted
throughout the country. The Performance is mentioned as
below-
S. No.
|
Item
of work
|
2011-12
|
2012-13
|
2013-14
upto Sep, 2013
|
|||
|
|
Number
|
Value/Duty
|
Number
|
Value/duty
|
Number
|
Duty
|
1
|
Seizures
|
25537
|
4522.89
|
28317
|
3079.43
|
7561
|
25535.71
|
|
Gold
|
486
|
46.43
|
871
|
99.34
|
299
|
6237.37
|
|
Narcotics
|
480
|
1711.93
|
470
|
969.15
|
113
|
13726.45
|
|
FICN(Face
Value)
|
25
|
2.64
|
21
|
2.23
|
00
|
00
|
|
Others
|
23797
|
728.37
|
26375
|
386.24
|
7149
|
5571.89
|
|
Commercial
Frauds
|
749
|
2033.52
|
580
|
1622.47
|
112
|
31107.79
|
2
|
Commercial
Fraud Cases Detected
|
5333
|
2198.20
|
5390
|
5970.38
|
864
|
17812.76
|
|
Under
Valuation
|
558
|
498.84
|
1961
|
320.2
|
71
|
647.42
|
|
Mis-declaration
|
1386
|
913.32
|
1217
|
2673.12
|
240
|
5737.93
|
|
Misuse
of DEEC/Advance License Scheme
|
6
|
14.02
|
11
|
139.99
|
1
|
18.78
|
|
Misuse
of DEPB Scheme
|
59
|
25.42
|
18
|
22.94
|
0
|
0
|
|
Misuse
of EPCG Scheme
|
30
|
82.41
|
25
|
231.85
|
2
|
373.32
|
|
Misuse
of EOU/EPZ/SEZ Scheme
|
9
|
9.88
|
9
|
44.13
|
1
|
6.13
|
|
Misuse
of Drawback Scheme
|
138
|
31.06
|
175
|
825.82
|
38
|
3575.16
|
|
Misuse
of end-use & other notifications
|
104
|
343.34
|
220
|
1609.92
|
67
|
1363.48
|
|
Others
|
3043
|
279.91
|
1754
|
102.41
|
482
|
9665.70
|
3
|
Duty
Recovered
|
6243
|
610.63
|
6757
|
1603.52
|
976
|
4656.96
|
4
|
Persons
arrested
|
597
|
|
575
|
|
231
|
|
5
|
Persons
detained
|
35
|
|
28
|
|
5
|
|
9.1 So far the seizures made and
persons arrested are the highest in numbers in comparison to other Central
Government Departments such as Income Tax, BSF, CRPF, CBI, IB, CISF, ITBP etc.
during the relevant period.
10. Litigation
& Adjudication Policy: The CBEC has taken several measures to
streamline the process of departmental adjudication and litigation before
various appellate authorities and judicial fora. These include:
(a) Creation of six additional
benches of CESTAT in Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Allahabad, Chandigarh and
Hyderabad.
(b) The
monetary limit of single member bench has been increased from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 15
lakh in the Finance Act, 2013.
(c) Several changes
have been made in the procedure for examination of the proposals to file the SLP in the Supreme Court. This
has been done with a view to avoid filing of SLP in a mechanical manner on frivolous grounds
resulting in less number of SLPs and civil appeals filed in Supreme Court in 2012-13 as compared to
previous year.
11. Drawback Division: It performs the
following functions-
i. Fixation
of all Industry rates of Duty Drawback;
ii. Monitoring
of sanction and disbursal of drawback by the field formations; and
iii. Liaison with the DGFT on all export promotion
(EP) schemes, their operations and monitoring
(except SEZ, EOU and Gem & Jewellery schemes which are being monitored by
the DGEP).
12. Achievements
of Drawback Division during the calendar year 2013: The major work done by
the Drawback Division during the period 01.01.2013 to 31.12.2013 is as
follows:
12.1 Foreign Trade Policy-
(A) The import of catalyst was
allowed under EPCG Authorization vide Notification No. 3/2013- Customs dated
13.02.2013.
(B) Vishakhapatnam
Airport and Kattupalli (Tamil Nadu) port were included in the list of Airports/ports in Export Promotion Customs Notifications
vide Notification No. 4/2013-Customs dated 14.02.2013 and Notification No.
20/2013-Customs dated 03.04.2013 respectively.
(C) Two Notifications numbered as 5/2013-Customs and
6/2013-Customs both dated 18.02.2013 were issued to
implement post export EPCG duty credit scheme under chapters of Foreign Trade
Policy (FTP).
(D) Two Notifications numbered as 2/2013-Central Excise
and 3/2013-Central Excise both dated 18.02.2013 were
issued to enable the use of duty credit scrips (granted under post export EPCG
Duty Credit
Scheme under the chapters of the FTP) for procuring goods from domestic
manufacturers by debit of Central Excise duties in the scrip subject to conditions
specified in the exemption Notifications.
(E) Norms for
execution of bank guarantee in respect of EPCG schemes were relaxed vide Circular
No. 8/2013 dated 04.03.2013.
(F) The changes announced in the Annual Supplement
2013-14 to the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14 by the Ministry of Commerce on 18th
April, 13 were implemented vide Notifications numbered as 21/2013-Cus,
22/2013-Cus, 23/2013-Cus, 24/2013-Cus, 14/2013-Central Excise, 15/2013-Central Excise,
6/2013-Service Tax, 7/2013-Service Tax, 8/2013-Service Tax all dated 18.4.13, 17/2013-Central Excise
& 29/2013-Cus both dated 16.5.13, 32/2013-Customs, 21/2013-Central Excise
& 11/2013-Service Tax all dated 13.6.13 and 46/2013-Customs dated 26.09.13.
The changes implemented are as below:-
i. A single zero duty EPCG scheme for all sectors was
notified. This rationalized and harmonized the earlier two EPCG schemes of zero and 3%
duty. The definition of 'export obligation' has been made stricter. Units in
Jammu and Kashmir have been permitted lowered specific EO like the units of
North Eastern States and Sikkim. The restrictions on simultaneously availing TUFS and single zero duty EPCG have been removed.
Consequently, a single Post Export
EPCG Duty Credit Scrip Scheme was also notified. In this, all duties are
paid in cash at time of import and the basic duty is granted as remission in
the form of duty credit scrip in proportion to export obligation fulfilled.
ii. The usage
of duty credit scrips that would be issued under the Incremental Exports Incentivisation Scheme on annual
basis for 2013-14 (a variant of the Focus Market Scheme) was notified by amendment to Focus Market
Scheme;
iii) The freely transferable reward scrips (FMS, FPS and
VKGUY) were enabled for utilization for payment
of Service Tax on procurement of services;
iv) Import of
cars etc. as commercially registered Tourist Vehicles for hotel and tourism
industry was brought
under usage of Served from India Scheme (SFIS) scrip and it was deleted from the EPCG scheme.
v. Exemption
from anti-dumping duty and safeguard duty under Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) was made
applicable only in case of actual user. On transfer of DFIA this facility was withdrawn.
vi. Under
Served from India Scheme (SFIS) duty credit scrips in the case of service
provider who is also
engaged in manufacturing activity, the import of capital goods including spares
related to its
manufacturing sector business has been permitted subject to certain conditions.
vii. In the case of Agri. Infrastructure Incentive Scrip
(AIIS) issued to Status Holders, transferability of the scrip to a
supporting manufacturer has been allowed subject to conditions.
viii. Under
Status Holders Incentive Scrip (SHIS) issued to Status Holders, the
transferability of
the duty credit scrip has been allowed within the group company which is a
manufacturer subject
to conditions.
ix. 36 Notifications pertaining to Advance Licenses, DEEC,
Advance Authorisations, DFIA and EPCG Schemes for the Policy
period 1992-1997 to 2004-2009 amended for implementing
the option to close cases of default in EO notified by the DGFT.
(G) Foreign
Post Office, New Delhi included as port of export in Export Promotion Customs Notifications vide Notification No.
38/2013-Customs dated 26.07.2013.
13. Drawback
Schedule: The All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule 2013-14 has been
notified w.e.f. 21.09.13 vide Notification No. 98/2013-Cus (N.T.)
dated 14.09.13. The salient features of the Schedule are:-
(A) All
Industry Rate (AIR) of Duty Drawback on many items that were already covered
under the drawback schedule prior to incorporation of erstwhile DEPB items have been reduced and on a few items like gold and silver
jewellery, silk yarn, silk fabric, silk garments & made-ups, wooden artwares etc. have been
increased.
(B) The
residuary AIR of 1% (composite) and 0.3% (Customs) has been provided to
hitherto Nil rated
items under chapters 4, 15 & 22, few items in chapter 24 and casein &
its derivatives in chapter
35. AIR has also been provided to articles of silver (silversmiths wares)
subject to similar
conditions as applicable to gold/silver jewellery and the Notes and Conditions
(22)/(23) of the said
Notification shall also have relevance.
(C) The specific rate provided to Ethanol/ENA under
tariff item No. 22071090 has been changed to ad
valorem 1% (composite) and 0.3% (Customs). Ad valorem rates have
been provided to certain items of chapter 37 and
imitation jewellery of chapter 71.
(D) Though the existing residuary rate of 1% ad valorem
(composite) and 0.3% (Customs) continues, the higher residuary
rates have been reduced from 1.5% to 1.3% (Customs) or from
2% to 1.7% (Customs) as the case may be.
(E) The process
of realignment of rates on items incorporated in the drawback schedule from the
erstwhile DEPB scheme
was continued along with rationalizing these rates. In general, AIR on these items has been reduced
including some to the applicable residuary rate. In the case of certain electronic goods
of chapter 84, 85 &93, the residuary rate has been provided at 1% (Customs).
(F) In the case of the most tariff items with ad
valorem all industry rates above 2%, the rates have been
supplemented with drawback caps.
(G) Separate
tariff entries have been created for cotton bags, grey and dyed knitted fabrics
of cotton, of MMF, of blend where cotton predominates and of
blends where MMF predominates, grey and dyed cotton fabrics with
lycra, womens’/girls' tops, embroidered fabrics of MMF, imitation jewellery of
glass, multi-speed complete bicycle with geared hubs, cranks made of aluminum,
single speed chain wheel and crank (crank made of aluminum), pillows/cushions/quilts/pouffes
filled with poly-fil/polyfill etc. A few tariff items have also been replicated
with same rates and caps under different four digit levels and
descriptions of certain tariff items have been modified to address
classification issues.
(H) AIR of Duty Drawback has been provided
on milk, milk products, casein and its derivatives and AIR withdrawn on wheat.
14.
Other aspects relating to Drawback:
Vide instructions dated 11.10.13, Board instructions dated 26.08.05
issued vide F.No. 609/110/2005-DBK regarding grant of provisional brand rate
were reiterated and a time limit of seven days
was fixed for issue of provisional brand rate letter in case of claim is made under
Rule 7 of the Drawback Rules, 1995.
15. Reforms and
Trade Facilitation Measures: CBEC has been an early starter in introducing
reforms. Substantial reforms have already been carried out in the
Central Excise laws and procedures since 1994. The object of these reforms was
to repose a greater trust in the tax-payers and bring about a substantial
improvement in the delivery system and compliance through automation and trade
facilitation measures. CBEC has also undertaken a number of e-governance
initiatives with the objective of improving tax-payer services, transparency,
accountability and efficiency in the indirect tax administration of India. These
applications have automated all major processes in Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax through web-based and workflow-based systems reducing the physical
interface between the tax payers and the Departmental officers,
thereby reducing discretion and opportunity for corrupt practices. Details of
the important trade facilitation measures are as below:
15.1 Customs: Customs has initiated
meaningful and effective trade facilitation that reduces transaction costs through the following measures for tax payers-
15.1(i)
Automation in Customs: CBEC had
modified the Indian Customs EDI System (ICES) in 2009 which
has been launched in 109 Customs locations in the country. The Indian Customs
EDI Gateway (ICEGATE), the gateway portal, hosts a number of
services for the EDI partners and provides facilities for e-filing
of documents from anywhere at any time (24/7). ICEGATE and ICES 1.5 are serving
about 6.7 lakh importers/exporters and handling nearly 98% of
International trade of India. CBEC is among the first Departments
that has adopted Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) framework
to provide IT services to end-users in a consistent manner.
The following taxpayer services have been provided to the
importers and exporters:-
a) E-filing of Bills of Entry, Shipping Bills, IGM/EGM
with electronic acknowledgements.
b) An Accredited Clients Programme (ACP) whereby trusted
importers are extended the facility of fast track Customs clearance.
c) Connectivity
with 17 types of stakeholders such as Custodian, Port Authorities, Shipping
Lines, Airlines,
Customs Brokers, DGFT, Banks and other Government agencies through electronic messages. This eliminates the need
for paper movement across agencies and across locations.
d) Facility of
electronic payment of duties.
e) Selective appraisement and examination through the Risk
Management System (RMS).
f) Facility of
filing of Bills of Entry and Shipping Bills through Service Centers.
g) Documents
processed on ‘first come, first-served’ basis and status can be tracked.
h) Drawback
is directly credited to bank accounts of exporters.
i) Electronic
Refund of Service Tax paid on exports.
j) Uniform
applicability of duty rates and trade policy across the country.
k) Centralized Bond Management
and elimination of Release Advices has enabled traders to file bond at any location and affect
clearance from any other location.
l) Electronic transmission of Shipping Bills to DGFT and
online receipt of licenses has reduced physical interface with the Department
and has also reduced time and cost of transaction.
m) Round the clock Helpdesk with toll-free number.
n) Automated Recording and
Targeting System (ARTS) provides protection of Intellectual Property Rights
(IPR).
15.1 (ii) Self Assessment: Self
Assessment of Customs duty by importers or exporters was introduced vide Finance Act, 2011. This is a
paradigm shift from assessment by Departmental officers to a trust based system of self-assessment.
The objective is to expedite release of imported/exported goods. The interest of revenue in terms of
ensuring correct declarations and duty payment is ensured by an electronic Risk Management System (RMS) that
identifies risky consignments for assessment or examination or both. The shift to Self
Assessment is aimed at increasing the facilitation level of consignments
imported through Air,
Sea and Inland Container Depots (ICDs) from the present 60%, 50% and 40% to
80%, 70% and 60%
respectively.
15.1(iii) On Site Post Clearance Audit (OSPCA) Scheme: The scheme for On
Site Post Clearance Audit (OSPCA) has been implemented for importers registered under the Customs
Accredited Client Programme (ACP). This scheme is aimed at facilitating Customs clearance of goods
and reducing dwell time. At the same time, revenue is safeguarded by a comprehensive
verification of records and documents at the premises of the importer/exporter on annual basis.
Other categories of importers/exporters will be considered for inclusion later.
15.1(iv) Authorized Economic Operator Programme:
Indian Customs Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) Programme has been developed
pursuant to World Customs Organization adoption of SAFE Framework of Standards. The programme aims
to provide businesses in international supply chain with an internationally recognized
quality work highlighting a business role in a secured supply chain and
compliance to laws.
The full fledged Indian AEO programme was rolled out by the CBEC in 2012 and
currently 16 applications are being processed at AEO centers at Regional Units
as well as Headquarters. The pamphlets, posters and advertisements have been circulated amongst the field formations and local
newspapers through the Directorate of Publicity & Public Relations for wide
publicity of AEO
programme. Trade sensitization programmes in zones
is currently underway.
15.1(v) 24x7 Customs Clearance:
i.
In order to facilitate importers
and exporters, CBEC began 24x7 Customs clearance from 2012
at identified Air Cargo Complexes, viz., Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi and Mumbai
and Sea Ports viz., Nhava Sheva, Kandla, Chennai and Kolkata
in respect of certain categories of imports and exports. This facility has now
been extended and presently covers 17 Air Cargo Complexes
and 4 Sea Ports.
ii.
Clearance of indigenously
manufactured goods has been allowed to Duty Free Shops located in
the arrival and departure halls of the international airports. The permissible
allowance including the restrictions and prohibitions, if any
applicable to passengers and members of crew
for purchase of the indigenous goods is governed by the same Baggage Rules that
govern the imported goods.
iii.
Risk Management System (RMS) for
exports was introduced with effect from 15.07.2013 at ICD’s of Patparganj and Mulund.
The aim is to expedite the flow of export of goods and reduce dwell time &
port congestion by limiting examination to the risky consignments on the basis
of risk parameters.
15.1(vi) International Customs Division: The
proposal to defreeze the tariff values of imported edible oils (which had not been revised since
August 2006), was implemented on receiving approval of CCEA. This is also a revenue positive measure
as it resulted in increase in the tariff values by over 70%. Tariff value has been introduced on Arecanut to
curb under-valuation. The value of the most of the imported consignments was earlier being declared in the
range of US $ 700-800 per MT. The present tariff value is US $ 1816/MT. This department has taken a
central role in coordinating with various border agencies for facilitation of trade at land borders. This
includes holding educational seminars for stake holders on regulatory requirements and pursuing issues
of OGA requirements with other Ministries for resolution. Section 69 of the Customs Act, 1962
was amended to allow
for re-export of goods through Post imported earlier by any mode of transport
and warehoused. This could help Indian FPO to become a major transit hub. A
scheme for allowing exports through Posts under Export Promotion Reward Schemes
has been operationalised.
15.1(vii) Interactive website: Indian Customs has
developed a user friendly interactive website to enable importers/exporters to
know tariff classification, applicable rate of Customs duty and other
regulatory requirements for clearance of
goods. Interactive website is an effective tool to help educate traders for making
correct assessment of duty after introduction of self assessment in Customs.
15.2 Central Excise and Service Tax: CBEC
has implemented the Automation of Central Excise and Service Tax (ACES)
project, a Mission Mode Project (MMP) of the Govt. of India under the National
e-Governance Plan. ACES has transformed the way for about
20 lakh indirect taxpayers to conduct their business with
the Department. The application has been rolled-out Nationally in 2009 in all
104 Commissionerates throughout the country.
15.2(i)
The following Taxpayer Services are provided under ACES:
i.
Online PAN-based Registration of Central Excise &
Service Tax assessees and online amendment.
ACES provides for online validation of PAN with the Income Tax database. When
any taxpayer enters a wrong PAN, the system will indicate the same.
ii.
Electronic filing
of claims, permissions, intimations and processing thereof.
iii.
Instant
e-acknowledgement of documents with Document Identification Number.
iv.
Viewing, filing
and tracking the status of documents online.
v.
Facility of
e-Payment and checking status online.
vi.
Online revenue reconciliation.
vii.
Online messages/alerts
to users on business related matters.
viii.
Online information to assessees
about issuance of Show Cause Notice, personal hearing and orders passed by
Adjudicating Authorities.
ix.
Online filing of replies to Show cause Notices.
x.
Online filing of application for provisional assessment.
xi.
Online filing and processing of refund claims.
xii.
Online filing of selected Export related documents.
15.2(ii) Simplified Service Tax refund procedure: A simplified electronic
Service Tax refund mechanism beneficial to
the exporting community, especially merchant exporters, was introduced wherein
the tax refund process being dealt
with by the designated Central Excise and Service Tax officers is electronically
enabled under the Customs application-ICES 1.5.
15.3 SEVOTTAM:
As a part of the Central Government initiative to improve the quality of public
services, the Central Board of Excise & Customs (CBEC)
has been identified as one of the 10 organizations with large citizen interface to
implement the quality management system for public services. This is based on
Indian Standard IS 15700:2005, prepared by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)
under the name of "SEVOTTAM". As such at present 13 offices under
CBEC are Sevottam certified and 8 more Sevottam offices are ready for
certification of Audit. The Department has also selected 47 Commissionerates
for Phase-III roll out.
15.4 E-Helpline: CBEC has launched
e-helpline facility at the Zonal levels for clarifying the doubts of trade and
industry in an administration friendly manner without the assessee having to
come to offices of the Department. Taxpayers can also use the e-helpline for
resolving procedural delays.
16. Involvement with other countries on tax
matters:
16.1 Cooperation
with BRIGS countries: The heads of revenue of BRIGS countries, i.e.,
Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, met in New Delhi on 17th
and 18th January, 13 and held discussions on issues
relating to International taxation, transfer pricing, prevention of cross-border
tax evasion and avoidance, exchange of information,
sharing of best practices in tax system administration and resolution of
disputes. This was the first meeting of the heads of revenue. On conclusion of
the meeting, a joint communiqué was issued in which the revenue heads of BRIGS countries agreed to develop greater cooperation on
various issues of mutual interest and concerns.
16.2 India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) revenue
administration working group meeting: IBSA dialogue forum is a trilateral
development initiative between India, Brazil and South Africa to promote South-South co-operation and bring together three
democracies to promote closer co-operation in both tax & Customs
matters and contribute to the IBSA dialogue forum. 8th meeting of IBSA Heads of
Revenue Administrations Working Group
(HRAWG) was held on 8th November, 13 and the 11th meeting of IBSA Revenue Administrations Steering Group (RASG) was
held on 4th to 7th November, 13 at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cooperation in the areas of International
taxation and transfer pricing, exchange of information, cooperation in multilateral fora, digital economy,
aggressive tax planning and capacity building were identified and
sub-groups have been constituted to work in these areas for enhanced
cooperation.
16.3 United Nations TP Manual: The UN
Transfer Pricing Manual was released in May, 2013 and is expected to address the concerns of developing
countries. India being one of the important developing countries/emerging
economies played an active role in the drafting of this Manual.
16.4 Coordination with other Multilateral Agencies: India
is an Associate member of Center for Inter American Tax Administration (CIAT),
a multilateral organization. The efforts of CIAT are focused on cooperation between the
tax administrations of different jurisdictions with a view to work jointly
against international tax evasion. To
fulfill this objective, CIAT organizes different activities, studies, workshops,
seminars etc. wherein the tax
administrations can share their suggestions, practices, experiences etc.
16.5 The Commonwealth Association of
Tax Administrators (CATA): It was established as
the result of a decision taken at the meeting of
the Commonwealth Finance Ministers in Barbados in 1977. India has been
an important member of it since 1979. Its activities include
organizing annual technical workshops, high quality training programmes for tax
officials, in country training programmes
tailored to meet the specific needs of members, publication of a quarterly
Newsletter, provisions of consultancy services & research facilities for
members on request, the supply of information
to members etc.
16.5 Indian
delegation also attended the ITD Global Conference on Tax and
Inter-governmental Relations from 3rd to 5th December, 2013
at Marrakech, Morocco and made a presentation.
17. CBEC consists of two separate
and distinct cadre formations. The core sub-ordinate cadre could be considered
at the bottom and Indian Customs & Central Excise Service/IRS could be
considered at the top. The top management cadre is composed of the officers
initially recruited as Assistant Commissioners (direct) and promoted to the
level of Chairman and Members of CBEC. Top level is followed by second level of
management at the field formations in the grades of the Assistant Commissioner
to Principal Chief Commissioner. The core sub-ordinate cadre consists of
Superintendents and Appraisers. Intake in the core sub-ordinate cadre is at the
level of Inspector, Preventive officers and Examiners which are Group ‘B’ posts
belonging to same grade of Inspector. The Inspectors of Central Excise,
Preventive officers and Examiner are promoted to the grade of Superintendent of
Central Excise, Superintendent of Customs (Preventive) and Appraisers of
Customs respectively belonging to Group ‘B’ gazetted executive grade.
18. Though the Central Board of
Excise and Customs (CBEC) deals with the task of policy formulation and
administration of indirect taxes through levy and collection of Central Excise
duty, Customs duty, Service Tax & other miscellaneous indirect taxes and
matters relating to Narcotics, yet CBEC has focused attention on prevention of
smuggling of the contraband goods being a serious threat to National security due
to recent shift in commodities being smuggled from traditional items like gold,
silver, watches etc. to arms, ammunition, explosives, fake Indian currency,
Narcotics etc. The major responsibility in the area of Central Excise is the
prevention of leakages & evasions in revenues and providing smooth &
efficient flow of collections. By revenue points of view, the CBEC is the
highest revenue earning source for the Union of India having no parallels for
years.
19.
In the last 10 years the assessee base has grown by 150% in Central Excise
(Table T 19-1) and a phenomenal 570% in Service Tax (Table T 19-2). During the
same period Central Excise revenue has increased by 80% (though inclusive of
CENVAT credit the growth counts to 160% - Table T 19-3) and Service Tax revenue
has grown by 90% (5 years data – Table T 19-4 Inclusive of CENVAT credit it
comes to 80% and assessee base has grown by 50%.).
Table T 19-1
Table T 19-2
Table T 19-3
Table T 19-4
PART-II
THE
CADRE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX
Superintendent cadre is a Group
‘B’ Executive (Gazetted) cadre in the hierarchy of CBEC. A Superintendent on
Central Excise front is required to know the basic composition and
manufacturing processes of large number of commodities to ascertain the exact
nature of classification of the product, feasibility of manufacturing in the declared
premises and its eligibility to levy alongwith eligibility to different
exemptions to arrive at correct rate of duty. A Superintendent of Central
Excise must know the requirement of input raw materials and production norms of
each & every product so as to keep watch & control over the behavior or
pattern of credits availed and evasion of tax. A little unawareness of the fact
leads to siphoning of Govt. revenue in unthinkable proportion. All the works
pertaining to levy & collection of duty, other aspects like export,
drawback, free trade zone, 100% Export Units, refund, prevention of revenue
leakage, collection of intelligence, investigation of hidden facts and
conclusion of assessment are day-to-day works of Superintendents on Central
Excise front. The Superintendent is accountable for any commission or omission having
his/her job always at the risk. As middle rung supervisory executive, all such
responsibilities are solely entrusted upon Superintendents.
On Customs front, a Superintendent deals
with the import, export, examination, appraising of value, prevention of
smuggling and many other activities of highly technical nature mostly relating
to International Trade and Commerce. New concepts on Tariffs and Trade having
International ramifications are dealt with by the Superintendent. The exploration
of areas of services involving Service Tax by service providers and the
scrutiny of returns to conclude assessment are the look outs of the
Superintendent in the Service Tax for which they are solely responsible and
accountable. The Superintendents also adjudicate the cases against revenue
offenders. They have to counter with the hardcore & dreaded smugglers,
white collared criminals, habitual & chronic revenue offenders during the
course of disposal of their executive and judicial duties. The Superintendent
of Central Excise has to work as Investigating authority, Intelligence
authority, Advocate, Judge, Scientist, Chemist, Technical Officer, Accountant,
Auditor, executive, revenue officer, consultant, advisor, help desk, National
Security Guard etc. during the course of fulfilment of his responsibilities.
2. Canadian Audit has been
introduced in CBEC in the scheme known as EA 2000. This scheme is based on
modern techniques and higher responsibilities. Under the scheme, there is
almost a rate of 50% growth on the spot recovery during the last 8 years. Like
Senior Audit Offices of AG Office under the pay scale of Rs. 8000-13500/- or
equivalent, the Superintendents of Central Excise are heading the Audit teams. The
functions relating to desk review and preparation of audit plans of highly
technical nature alongwith long audits in the fields are being conducted by the
Superintendents of Central Excise. Now in the era of liberalization, the CBEC
has focused on Prevention and Audit instead of conventional control. In the
Preventive set-up, Superintendent is functioning as a team leader like the DSP/ASP
of the CBI and DCIO/AD of IB. The investigations and intelligence are the
integral part of their duties. It is the only reason that they can go on
deputation to the CBI and IB to work on analogous posts DSP, DCIO etc. The work
of the Central Excise Superintendent require specific expertise. The officers
from no department are entitled to work on this post for the want of the said
specific expertise. In EA 2000 Audit, the work and responsibilities of
Superintendent of Central Excise are at par with the Senior Audit Officer of AG
Office.
3. In the back-drop of such
onerous responsibilities being carried by each Superintendent of Central
Excise, Customs & Service Tax, it is humbly put forth before the Hon’ble
Commission that every Superintendent performs his/her work responsibilities at
the cost of life of self as well as family being countered with the hardcore
& dreaded smugglers, white collared criminals, chronic habitual offenders
of revenue & law etc. including other hard core criminals. Apart from the
above, Superintendents are dealing with and are responsible for strict
implementation of several Acts having bearing on levy and collection of
revenue. A few of such Acts are given below among others-
i) The
Customs Act, 1962.
ii) The
Central Excise Act, 1944.
iii) The
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
iv) The
Factories Act, 1948.
v) The
Medical and Toilet Preparation (Excise Duty) Act, 1955.
vi) The
Companies Act, 1956.
vii) The Monopolies
and Restrictive Trade Policies Act, 1969.
viii)
The General Clauses Act, 1897.
ix) The
Khadi and other Handloom Industries Development (Additional Excise duty on
Cloth) Act, 1953.
x) The Textile Committee Act, 1963.
xi) The Additional Duties Excise (Goods of Special
Importance) Act, 1957.
xii) All Cess Acts.
xiii)
The
Service Taxes provisions introduced through the Finance Act, 1994.
xiv)
The
Indian Contract Act, 1872.
xv) The
Sale of Goods Act.
xvi)
The Finance Act, 1994.
xvii)
The
Import and Export Trade Control Act.
xviii)
The
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FEMA).
xix)
The
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Act (COFEPOSA).
xx) The
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.
xxi)
The
Merchant Shipping Act.
xxii)
The
Indian Petroleum Act.
xxiii)
The
Indian Tariff Act.
xxiv)
The
Arms Act.
xxv)
The
Opium Act.
xxvi)
The Destructive Pests and Insects Act.
xxvii)
The
Antiquities Export (Control) Act.
xxviii)
The
Indian Penal Code.
xxix)
The Code of Criminal Procedure.
xxx)
The
Indian Evidence Act.
xxxi)
The
Merchandise Mark Act.
xxxii)
The
Customs Tariff Act.
xxxiii)
All Finance Acts etc. etc.
4. The job description of
Superintendents of Central Excise as enumerated above is not
elaborative/exhaustive but only indicative of the huge responsibilities with
regard to activities bearing upon levy and collection of taxes in three vital
segments of indirect taxation, i.e., Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax
and related technicalities & procedures involved therein. The jobs
performed by Superintendents in the fields for prevention of smuggling and
fighting against smugglers & drug traffickers both on land & boarders
entail risk of life and are completely hazardous & arduous by any
standards. The High Power Committee in its findings read
with letter dated 27.10.1995 of CBEC has unequivocally conceded to it. The
Gazetted Executive officers of the Revenue Department in general and
Superintendents of Central Excise, Service tax & Customs in particular are
performing certain specialized work. For comparison of similar level post in
other Departments, it can be said that the duties & responsibilities of
these posts are more hazardous & arduous than the posts of DSP/ASP of CBI and
DCIO/AD of IB or any comparable post of any other Department.
5. The Superintendents are mainly
responsible for collection of the huge revenue in the form of Central Excise
duty, Customs duty and Service Tax. The performance of the CBEC based on the
committed & dedicated efforts of the Superintendents are furnished below:
Growth in Revenue Collection since
2002-03 (in Rs. Crores)
Sources of Revenue
|
2002-03
|
2011-12
|
2012-
13
|
2013-14 (BE)
|
%
Growth over
2002-03 in
2011-12
|
%
Growth
over
2002-03 in
2012-13
|
%
Growth
over 2002-03 in
2013-14 (E)
|
Central Excise
|
87383
|
150695
|
171996
|
197554
|
72.45
|
96.8
|
122.60
|
Service Tax
|
5000
|
95000
|
132697
|
180141
|
1800
|
2553
|
3502
|
Customs
|
45500
|
153000
|
164853
|
187308
|
236.26
|
262.31
|
311.66
|
Total
|
137883
|
398695
|
469546
|
565003
|
189.16
|
240.53
|
309.76
|
Increase in Workload since 2002-03
Work Indicators
|
2002-03
|
2010-11
|
2011-12
|
%
Growth
since
2002-03
|
No. of Service Tax
Assessees
|
1,33,531
|
16,30,317
|
18,17,415
|
1261%
|
No. of Central Excise
Units
|
79,770
|
3,60,968
|
3,96,118
|
397%
|
No. of Import Export
Documents
|
37,40,970
|
1,25,88,909
|
1,36,94,901
|
266%
|
No. of Factory Stuffed
Containers
|
1,00,000
|
10,80,000
|
12,00,000
|
1100%
|
No. of International
Passengers
|
94,00,000
|
3,79,00,000
|
4,15,00,000
|
341%
|
Other parameters of increase in workload
Function
|
2004-05
|
2011-12
|
% Growth in Value / Duty
|
|||
Number of cases
|
Value / Duty
(In Rs crore)
|
Number of cases
|
Value / Duty
(In
Rs. crore)
|
|
||
Anti-smuggling
|
Seizures
|
45424
|
859.31
|
25537
|
4523
|
426
|
Duty Evasion
|
1033
|
1080
|
5333
|
2198
|
104
|
|
Anti-evasion
|
Duty Evasion
|
7217
|
3240
|
7182
|
15594
|
381
|
Audit
|
Duty Detection
|
21313
|
1661
|
33769
|
11727
|
606
|
Increase in number of sub-formations
Areas
|
2002-03
|
2011-12
|
%age increase
|
Number of ICDs/CFSs
|
154
|
262
|
70.13%
|
Airports/Air Cargos
|
33
|
39
|
18.18%
|
Major Seaports
|
12
|
12
|
0
|
Minor Seaports
|
49
|
84
|
71.42%
|
Foreign Post Office
|
9
|
10
|
11.11%
|
Integrated Check Post
|
0
|
2 @
|
New Formation
|
LTU
|
0
|
5
|
New Formation
|
@ (5 more ICP’s are likely to be operational
soon.)
DUTIES &
WORK RESPONSIBILITIES OF CENTRAL EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT
(A) SCHEDULE OF WORK AND STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS OF SUPERINDENT
OF CENTRAL EXCISE
1. Drawal of samples for correct
classification.
2. Determination of value of the goods
for assessment. With the introduction of transaction value, the entire responsibility of
determination of value including other circumstances not covered under the aspect of transaction value has come on the
shoulders of the Superintendents of Central Excise.
3. To undertake preventive patrolling
for exercising control over the assessees and to prevent
clandestine removal of excisable goods even in remote and inaccessible regions.
4. Examination
of accounts and physical verification of stocks to prevent leakage of revenue and misuse of concession and exemption.
5.
Conducting search, effecting seizure and arresting offenders.
6. Verification in connection with Registration
of assessee. Especially, the recent
system of post verification has become very important.
7. Verification of the credit taken on the duty paid on inputs, capital goods and
input services under CENVAT scheme and issuing of certificates to the manufacturers and provider
of taxable services to facilitate taking of credit {Explanation appended to Rule 9 (3) of the
CENVAT Rules, 2004}.
8. Remission of Central Excise duty
not exceeding one thousand rupees where the goods
have been lost or destroyed by natural cause or by unavoidable accident or
being unfit for consumption & marketing before removal.
9. Recommendations for grant of refunds.
10. Detection of offence, drafting of
show cause notice after investigation and full assistance in adjudication of offence cases alongwith preparing the
adjudication orders for higher authorities.
11. Scrutiny of orders to
see their legality and propriety.
12. Defend cases before Commissioner (Appeal)
on behalf of the department.
13. Verification of production and
checking of documents from the entry of raw materials upto its clearance as finished goods.
14. Scrutiny of ER-l and ER-3
returns.
15. Survey work to bring the
manufacturers of excisable goods to Central Excise control.
16. Collection and compilation of
Statistical data, preparation of various reports & returns to study the
trend of revenue and follow up the reasons of fall of revenue.
17. Enquiry & investigation and
collection & dissemination of intelligence.
18. Public and trade relations with
special thrust on trade & factory management
and rendering assistance from the recently introduced Help Centers.
19. Examination & supervision of
sealing of packages of goods, cleared for Export particularly in DEEC Export,
DFRC & Advance Authorisation Scheme including Export to SEZ as envisaged
in Foreign Trade Policy.
20. Recovery of arrears of revenue
and other Government dues by attachment and sale of goods/property.
21. Supervision of work
done by the Inspectors.
22. All
other works relating to Central Excise Act, 1944 and Central Excise Rules, 2002
and other Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax Rules.
23. Knowledge & implementation of various
provisions of the different Acts, Rules and policies including as under-
i) The Central Excise Act, 1944.
ii)
The Customs Act, 1962.
iii)
The Factories Act, 1948.
iv)
The Medical and Toilet Preparation (Excise Duty) Act.
v)
The Companies
Act, 1956.
vi)
The General Clauses Act, 1897.
vii)
The Khadi and other Handloom Industries development
(Additional Excise duty on Cloth) Act, 1953.
viii) The
Textile Committee Act, 1963.
ix) The
Additional duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance)
Act,1957.
x)
All Cess Acts.
xi) The provisions of levy and
collection of Service Tax introduced through Finance Act, 1994.
xii) The Indian Contract Act.
xiii) The Sale of Goods Act.
xiv) Foreign Trade Policy.
xv)
Foreign Trade
(Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.
xvi)
SEZ Act, 2005
& subordinate Rules & Regulations.
xvii)
Foreign Exchange
Management Act & Regulations.
xviii) Indian Evidence Act.
xix) Code of Criminal Procedure.
xx) Indian Penal Act.
xxi)
The Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
xxii)
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade
Policies Act, 1969.
xxiii)
The Additional Duties Excise (Goods of
Special Importance) Act, 1957.
xxiv)
The Service Taxe provisions introduced
through the Finance Act, 1994.
xxv)
The
Finance Act, 1964.
xxvi)
The Import and Export Trade Control Act.
xxvii)
The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FEMA).
xxviii)
The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and
Prevention of Smuggling Act (COFEPOSA).
xxix)
The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances (NDPS) Act.
xxx)
The Merchant Shipping Act.
xxxi)
The Indian Petroleum Act.
xxxii)
The Indian Tariff Act.
xxxiii)
The Arms Act.
xxxiv) The
Opium Act.
xxxv)
The Destructive Pests and Insects Act.
xxxvi) The Antiquities
Export (Control) Act.
xxxvii)
The Merchandise Mark Act.
xxxviii) The Customs Tariff Act.
xxxix) All Finance Acts etc. etc.
(B) DUTY & NATURE OF JOB
PERFORMED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT DURING HIS TENURE IN CUSTOMS FORMATIONS
The
posting in Customs formation may be categorized as the following-
i)
Posting in Land Customs station
including the remotest of the remote places.
ii)
Posting in Inland Container Depots
(ICDs).
iii)
Posting at airports and sea ports.
iv)
Posting in Preventive Unit
v)
Posting in Divisional/Hqrs.
offices.
vi)
Posting at SEZs.
2. Posting in Land Customs Station
can be further classified into two categories-
i)
Land Customs Station at Border Point, e.g., Nathula
Pass, Rothang Pass etc.
ii)
Land Customs Station away from the Border, i.e.,
Ranaghat, T.T. Shed etc.
3. Nature of job & functions
against Sl. No. (i) to (iii) above: The job of the Superintendent can be
broadly classified into three (3) categories-
a) Assessment- In the layman language,
assessment means a process wherein the Superintendent
decides if the data & value provided in the bill of export or import is
correct or not. This is a quasi judicial function of
the Superintendent. In cases of exports under some benefit
scheme, the Superintendent is responsible to decide the exactitude of the benefit
claimed by the exporter. This judgment needs not only the knowledge of the Customs
Act but also he/she is to keep in mind export/import policy and Central Excise
Act in addition to all the relevant Acts and procedures. It may so happen that the
particular export or import is in order in view of the Customs Act, Central
Excise Act, Exim Policy but banned by Drugs &
Cosmetic Act or any other Act/law with which the Superintendent does not
have any day to day connection. The assessment of import duty and
decision about the importability/exportability of a
product is also taken by the Superintendent. Any dispute between exporter/importer
and the Department has to go through the process of natural justice. This involves
issuance of Show Cause Notice and decision thereof which is never possible
without the pivotal role of the Superintendent.
b) Cargo Clearance- Unlike Central
Excise, the exercise of import/export clearance is totally
a process of physical clearance. The Superintendent
is responsible for matching the description of goods with the description
provided in the Bill of export/ Bill of entry, the counting/weighment of the
goods and to verify the importability/exportability of the goods alongwith
other data/details.
c) Verification of post export
benefit document - A number of post export benefits are allowed
by the Government like DEPB, Drawback etc. The Superintendent is required
to verify and certify the genuineness of export. It is found as per the present
trend that there is bulk of export under
different export benefit schemes issued by the
Ministry of Commerce. The Superintendent is required to verify each of the export
document in effect which means each of such document is required to be verified twice.
d) The
Central Excise benefits connected with the export are also required
to be verified from export point of view before allowing the benefit.
4. Nature of job & functions at
preventive unit-
i)
Collection of intelligence
and information.
ii)
Working out of
the same.
iii)
Regular
Preventive work.
iv) Documentation
of the work.
v) Preparation and issuance of
Show Cause Notices.
vi) Preparation of Adjudication
Orders on behalf of Commissioner and other authorities.
vii) Receiving
the seized goods from BSF.
viii)
Preparation of Annexure - I (valuation of seized/confiscated goods)
ix)
Disposal of seized/confiscated goods.
x)
Auction of livestock, perishable and non- perishable items.
xi)
Preparation of reports/returns.
xii)
Court matters etc. etc.
5. At the time of posting at Divisional/Hqrs.
Offices, the Superintendent does various works relating to adjudication,
review, administration, statistics, recovery, audit, appeal, systems, valuation
etc. He also looks after the work of legal and technical nature alongwith
various other miscellaneous works.
6. Function of the Superintendent
posted in SEZ: The Superintendent of Central Excise is one of the
officers who is an Authorized Officer as defined in Rule 2(c) of the SEZ
Rules, 2005 and is required to discharge the duties of an Authorized Officer
and also to discharge the functions of Specified Officer on
authorization. The responsibilities can be estimated from the statement of the Finance
Ministry saying that the benefits of tax exemption is going to be availed by the units in SEZ
amounting to Rs. 1 lakh crore (upto 2010).
The Authorized Officer is responsible to
check any misuse and discharge the following duties-
i).
Assessment of Shipping Bills, Bill of Entry and DTA Bill of Entries.
ii). Verification
of goods procured from DTA and imported before use;
iii). Allowing
admission into SEZ to the goods procured under claim of export entitlement
on the basis of ARE-1 and Bill of Export filed by the supplier which is assessed by the
Authorized Officer;
iv). Endorsement
of ARE-1 and/or Bill of Export on admission of goods which is the
proof of export;
v).
Allowing of clearance of the
goods from the warehouse on the cover of ex-bond Shipping
Bill and on the basis of Bill of Entry duly assessed by the Authorized Officer;
vi). Presence of Authorized
Officer in destruction of goods outside SEZ ;
vii). Permission to a unit to
transfer goods to an EOU or EHTPU or STPU or BPU or to a bonded warehouse without payment of duty subject to conditions;
viii). Receipt
of an undertaking for return of goods transferred for quality testing or research
and development purpose;
ix). Making entries of all incoming and
outgoing goods/consignments in register;
x). Checking of marks and numbers of
all imported goods/consignments;
xi). Work related to export
incentives;
xii). Allowing of goods from DTA after verification;
xiii). Escort duty, if required;
xiv). Attending legal work;
xv). Preparation of show cause
notice after investigation;
xvi). Preparation of report and
return;
xvii). Special checking of consignments exported under
self-sealing, if needed.
(C) FUNCTIONS OF THE SUPERINTENDENTS POSTED IN SERVICE
TAX
i)
Survey to locate provider of
taxable service.
ii)
Registration of Service Tax assessees.
iii)
Receive the statutory Returns and
scrutinize after calling the records & classifying the taxable
service.
iv)
Full responsibility of the
Superintendent to verify the credit taken on the duty paid
on inputs, capital goods and input services under CENVAT scheme and issuing
of certificates to the manufacturers and provider of taxable services for taking
of CENVAT credit. {Explanation appended to Rule 9 (3) of the Cenvat Rules, 2004.}
v)
Detection and investigation of
taxable service on which tax not paid.
vii)
Issuance of Show Cause Notices and comments on the
reply of the Show Cause Notices.
viii)
Preparation of Adjudication Orders on behalf of Commissioner and other
authorities.
ix) Scrutiny of the adjudication orders to see
their legality and propriety.
x) Adjudication of cases as quasijudicial
authority.
xi) Recommendation for grant of
refund including rebate/drawback after verification of export of
taxable service.
xii) Attachment of property prior
to adjudication.
xiii) Full
assistance for attachment/sale to recover arrears and also to realize the
government dues from any organization from which the money is due.
xix) Court matters.
xx) Knowledge and implementation
of different Acts and Rules made thereunder related to taxable services including as
under-
a.
Insurance
Act,1938;
b.
Aircraft
Act,1934;
c.
Airports
Authority of India Act,1994;
d.
Customs Act,1962;
e.
Architects Act,1972;
f.
Foreign Exchange
Management Act,1999;
g.
Reserve Bank
Act,1934;
h.
Banking
Regulation Act,1949;
i.
Central Boards of
Revenue Act,1963;
j.
Companies
Act,1956;
k. Prasar Bharti (Broad-casting Corporation of India) Act,1990;
1. Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995;
m.
Information
Technology Act, 2000;
n.
Forward Contracts
(Regulation) Act,1952;
o.
General Insurance
Business (Nationalisation) Act,1972;
p.
Sale of Goods
Act,1930;
q.
Motor Vehicles
Act,1988;
r.
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act,1999;
s.
Transfer of
Property Act,1882;
t.
Indian Ports
Act,1908;
u.
Major Port Trusts
Act,1963;
v.
Chartered
Accountants Act,1949;
w.
Cost and Works
Accountants Act,1959;
x.
Company Secretaries
Act,1980;
y.
Securities
Contract (Regulation) Act,1956;
z.
Securities and
Exchange Board of India Act,1992;
aa. Indian
Telegraph Act, 1985 etc. etc.
It
deserves special mention that other agencies work only with specific laws,
whereas the Central Excise Superintendents are required to have a fair
understanding and have to work with the various laws.
PART-III
APPEAL FOR REMOVAL OF EXTRAOERDINARILY ACUTE STAGNATION EXISTING IN THE CADRE
OF CENTRAL EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT
Central Excise Superintendents are retiring in PB2
after getting only one promotion in the service career of 35-40 years
after joining the job as Inspector while their common entry counterparts of
CBDT, CSS etc. easily enter & enjoy PB4 levels after getting 5-6 promotions.
They are getting promotion (if any) merely to Junior Time Scale while other
counterparts of CPWD, Railway Board, AFHQ, Foreign Services, CSS,
Administrative Services, Police Services, Forest Services, Sate Services etc.
to Senior Time Scale. They are also forced to work under the
extreme juniors of Customs belonging to the same cadre under the same
organisation of CBEC in same Department of Revenue of same Ministry of Finance
having same administrative hierarchy and recruited by same process. The rights to
grow, make progress and live with dignity have been snatched from the Central
Excise Superintendents.
2.
The causation of frustration of any cadre in any organization is due to the
stagnation. The cadre of Superintendent of Central Excise is facing the
extraordinarily acute stagnation and worst career prospects in the Govt. of
India. They are retiring on a PB2 post with only single promotion in the career
of 35-40 years after being joined the job as Inspector whereas their
counterparts of CSS, CBDT, Rajya Sabha Secretariat etc. are easily entering
into PB4 after getting 5 to 6 promotions. Only 1% Superintendents of Central
Excise are able to enter into JTS level of Group ‘A’ at the fag end of the
career after joining the job as Inspector. They are even forced to work under
extreme juniors of Customs recruited as Examiner through same examination with
same eligibility conditions belonging to same cadre of Inspector in the same
organisation of CBEC performing same nature of duties with same administrative
hierarchy under same department of Revenue of same Ministry of Finance merged
at JTS Group ‘A’ entry level. Some reasons for their stagnation are as below-
i)
The Cadre review exercise have not been conducted at prescribed intervals of
every five years in CBEC required to be conducted in accordance with IV CPC
& V CPC recommendations and DOPT OM No. 2/1/87-PP dated 23.11.1987. Only
two cadre restructurings have happened in the history of the CBEC, the
implementation of one of which is still pending despite of its process being
started in 2006.
ii)
Adopting of ratio system for three categories of Group ‘B’ gazetted officers of
same organisation to enter into Group ‘A’ despite of the DOPT guidelines not
mandating any ratio formula to enter Group ‘A’, if the number of promotional
posts is too less. In our case, the number of the promotional posts is even
less than 2% in r/o Central Excise feeder category.
iii)
Framing of faulty & discriminatory Recruitment Rules as well as promotion
policy by CBEC.
iv)
No in-situ promotions scheme or time bound promotions scheme or flexible
complimenting scheme or fast track promotions scheme etc. for the post of
Superintendent/Inspector of Central Excise.
v)
Modified ACP Scheme has also provided no relief being proved lossful instead of
beneficial as compared to ACP Scheme. MACPS is able to grant the Grade Pay/pay
scale to our officers after 30 years or more service which they were able to
get within 24 years under ACPS. Whereas the MACPS source being the same (VIth
CPC), our counterparts are able to get two financial upgradations more than us
merely within 26 years of service in the State governments of Uttar Pradesh
etc. without offsetting any MACP upgradtion with the time scale.
vi)
No scheme to grant even time scales under regular time intervals.
vii) Existence
of Inter category/intra-cadre disparities in promotions.
viii) A few
Cadre Restructurings were conducted by CBEC which were not on the basis of
functional cum structural considerations with due regard to the duties and need
to promote efficiency in the organisation/department and also not in accordance
with the guidelines prescribed by DOPT. These were conducted merely to give
maximum benefits to the Group ‘A’ officers.
ix) No scheme to
grant parity, functional or non-functional, with the best placed
counterparts.
3. The 5th
Central Pay Commission in its report vide para 66.117 has interalia observed
that “the activities of the CBEC are covered under the Non-Plan Budget of the
Department of Revenue, which has reportedly caused a situation where legitimate
needs for expansion of the department are not taken care of. It has been
demanded in this context that a relationship between revenue collected and
expenditure on revenue services should be established so that need for
additional staff for the department is properly taken care of. We have
considered this demand and feel that augmentation of the manpower resources of
the department should be strictly determined only on functional considerations
and there can be no nexus between expenditure on establishment and revenue
collections”. These observations were totally ignored by the CBEC.
4. The Tax
Reforms Committee headed by Dr. Raja Chelliah has categorically mentioned in
para 10.2 of Page 126 of Interim Report that the Government should recognize
the paramount importance of the Revenue Department and should spare no efforts
in improving their conditions of service, technical skills and work
environment. In para 10.3 interealia it is also mentioned that taking into
account the vital role that the Revenue Department should play in garnering
adequate resources for ensuring the security of the country as well as
substantial economic growth with social justice, the committee is firmly of the
view that the salary scales and promotional prospects of the officers and
staffs in the revenue department should at least be comparable with the best
that Government offers to its employee. But very unfortunately, no
consideration has been given to the above recommendations of this committee
also.
5. The 4th
Central Pay Commission in its report vide para 23.9 and 23.10 (Chapter 23) has
interalia observed that “It appears that introduction of Selection grade and
grant of one stagnation increment have proved to be temporary palliatives. A solution
of the problems of stagnation and inadequate promotion opportunities should
seem to be in a rational cadre structure and long pay scales. It is recognized
that promotional opportunities should be available to employees as motivation
for them to contribute their best in the discharge of their duties. At the same
time, the system of career progression should be consistent with the functional
needs and requirements of organization. It may not, therefore, be feasible to
lay down a rigid formulation as to the number of promotions which an employee
should have in his career and the length of service which should qualify for
such time bound promotions.” Vide DOPT OM No. 2/1/87-PP dt.23.11.87 circulated
under MF(DR) F.No.12/217/87-coord dated 21.12.87 (Cir. 317/87), the guidelines
for cadre review of Group B, C and D cadres in the light of the recommendations
made by the 4th Central Pay Commission were issued by the Central
Govt. In the said circular, it is inter alia mentioned that “periodical Cadre
Review is an important part of personnel management in the organization. It
plays a vital role in the smooth functioning of the cadre and in keeping up the
moral of its members. The main thrust of the cadre review should be on manpower
projections and recruitment planning on scientific lines aiming at the same
time at rationalization of the existing cadre structure with a view to improve
the efficiency, moral and effectiveness of the cadre”. It is also stipulated in
the said circular that the cadre review exercise should be conducted after
every five years.
6.
On the basis of 4th Central Pay Commission recommendations for
periodical cadre review with a view to ensuring reasonable career progression
to the employees and operational efficiency through comprehensive manpower
planning, most of the Central Government Departments conducted cadre review in
the year 1987 whereas Union Finance Ministry under letter dated 25.07.1989 (MF-DR-F.No.A-11013/4/89-Ad.IV)
conveyed the sanction of the posts in the cadre review of Indian Customs and
Central Excise Group ‘A’ posts by increasing the posts of IC&CES(Group A)
from 1278 to 1718 without providing any promotional avenues to Group ‘B’
Gazetted officers. These Group ‘A’ posts were also not increased in proportion
to Group ‘B’ cadre strength.
7. The Central
Government under DOPT O.M.No.2/1/87-PP dated 23.11.87 issued order for
periodical Cadre Review of various staff cadres at an interval of 5 years and
in accordance with such instructions, it was required on the part of the CBEC
to make Cadre Review at an interval of 5
years in the following block years.
a.
Ist Cadre Review upto 1986.
b.
IInd Cadre Review for 1987-91.
c.
IIIrd Cadre Review for 1992-96.
d.
IVth Cadre Review for 1997-2001.
e.
Vth Cadre Review for 2002-2006.
f.
VIth Cadre Review for 2007-2011.
g.
VIIth Cadre Review for 2011-2015.
8. A proposal of
the Customs and Central Excise Department for the up-gradation of 2357 posts of
Inspectors of Central Excise/Preventive Officers to Superintendents of Central
Excise/Superintendent (Preventive) of Customs was been approved by the Hon’ble
Finance Minister in July 1996. This consisted of 1757 posts of Inspector and
600 posts of Preventive Officers. Vide F. No. A-11012/1/96-Ad.IV
Dated:18.06.1997, it is interalia mentioned that “while approving the proposal,
it was stipulated that the upgradation shall be carried out in a phased manner,
the officers with 17 years of regular service to be promoted in the first phase
within a year and the officers completing 16 years of regular service to be
promoted in the second phase. But the Group ‘A’ posts were not increased in the
proportion of the increase of Group ‘B’ posts/Span Control etc.
9. During 1998,
the CBEC has decided that “the Excise administration in particular relating to
Audit, Preventive, Service Tax, Ranges and certain other areas is required to
be urgently re-enforced and re-structured by providing higher level officers
with enhanced expertise at different levels as a part of the overall objective
of bringing improvement in the efficiency of the organisation and morale of the
employees”.
10. Accordingly
a proposal of Cadre Restructuring submitted by CBEC was accepted by Revenue Secretary
on 03.11.1998 which interalia provided for (a) up-gradation of 3387 post of
Superintendent (b) creation of 236 posts of Senior Superintendents (c)
up-gradation of 700 posts of Superintendent of Customs (Preventive) and (d)
up-gradation of 350 posts of Appraisers. In accordance with the said
restructuring proposal, it was suggested for up-gradation/creation of 4673
senior level posts. This up-gradation should have been on similar lines of
cadre restructuring approved for CBDT to restore parity with Income Tax
Department.
11.
However without approving the up-gradation/creation of 4673 senior level posts,
CBEC reportedly submitted a proposal of Cadre Restructuring which was
subsequently approved by the Central Government vide Cabinet Secretariat note No.28/CM/2001(i)
dated 16.07.2001 totally ignoring the legitimate claims of the Superintendents of Central Excise (Group ‘B’ gazetted) as a
whole with an intention to provide more benefits only to the officials of IRS (Customs
& Central Excise) Group ‘A’ service in CBEC. This cadre restructuring was
not conducted on functional-cum-structural considerations with due regard to
the duties as needed to promote efficiency in the organisation/department but
was conducted only to give parity to the IRS of CBEC with the IRS of CBDT.
12. In
accordance of the F. No. A-11019/72/99-Ad.IV Dated: 19.07.2001 the sanction
strength of IRS (Group ‘A’), Group ‘B’ Executive and Group ‘C’ Executive of
CBEC was as under during 2001:
Chief Commissioner : 47
Commissioner : 290
Addl. Commissioner : 300
Joint Commissioner : 276
Deputy Commissioner : 701
Asst. Commissioner : 690
Total Group-A : 2304
Total Group-B Executive: 12766
Total Group-C Executive: 18053
13. The restructuring was done in such
a manner that Group-A direct recruits were promised five pay scales and five
promotions after the entry level excluding the level of Member & Chairman
of the Board. The Group-B gazetted Executive Officers who enter the service as
Group-B non-gazetted registered an increase of 61 percent. However, the
promotional avenues from Group-B to Group-A was drastically reduced because
only 345 (50% if 690) promotional posts were available for 12766 Group-B
gazetted executive officers for their 2nd promotion which worked out
to merely 2.7% and only around 1% of total strength of Group ‘B’ Gazetted as
well as Non-Gazetted executive officers of Central Excise while the promotional
avenues to Group-A officers ranged from 55% to 129%.
14. In the Cadre Restructuring - 2013 of CBEC (notified on
18.12-2013), 689 senior level posts (Principal Chief Commissioner to Deputy Commissioner)
have been created whereas only 300 posts (regular) have been created at Group
‘A’ entry level, i.e., Asst. Commissioner in JTS crade. Total consequential
vacancies at the level of Asst. Commissioner (regular) will be 989 (689 + 300)
which are proposed to be filled-up @ 50% by promotion and 50% by Direct
Recruitment in accordance with the Recruitment Rules. In effect, majority of
these posts are going to remain unfilled for next three to twelve years.
Particularly, in the Financial Years of 2013-14 and 2014-15, only 484 vacancies
are likely to be filled by way of promotions as the corresponding 485 DR
vacancies will actually be available only within 12 years as recruitment
process of UPSC cannot commence before Feb, 2015.
15. Moreover, the CBEC is already behind the model calendar of
DPC for the post of Asst. Commissioner by 2 years resulting in the retirement
of the officers due for promotion. Further as on date, there are around 250
vacant posts of Asst. Commissioner on direct quota and during next 10 years,
around 1000 of regular posts (approximately 100 every year) will be lying
vacant. For effective cadre management and as per UPSC norms, the ideal DR
(direct recruit) quota shall be around 150 per year and UPSC will not be
inclined to recruit more. Hence, approximately 12 years will be required to
fill up all such posts (250+485+1000=1735). Accordingly, a good number of Asst.
Commissioner posts will remain vacant for next 12 years.
16. As per DOPT OM No. No. I-11011/1/2009-CRD dated 14-12-210,
“The Cadre Controlling Authorities are, however, advised not to resort to any
bulk recruitment as it would create a bulge in the structure leading to
stagnation at later stage. This may be kept in view while projecting
recruitment planning.” It is surprising to note that CBEC lost sight of such
important advice of DOPT. Keeping a large number of posts vacant in the grade
of Asst. Commissioner for a period of 12 years is bound to adversely affect the
revenue collections. Besides, it will increase the size of the bottlebase
beneath the bottleneck directly affecting promotional prospects of Group-B
Gazetted officers.
17. Stagnation level in the grade of Superintendent of Central
Excise is presently nearly 20 years. It will be increased to 24 years in the
coming years. It is also worth to submit that the present stagnation is also
around 20 years as an average at the level of Central Excise Inspector. Even
the Inspectors with 25 years of service are waiting for promotion. Thus, the
present scheme of filling-up of 989 posts of Asst. Commissioner in the ratio of
50% by promotion and 50% by direct recruitment will have demoralizing effect on
the officers at the cutting edge level of Central Excise Group-B Gazetted. If
such a large number of posts are kept vacant, it is not understood how the
promised growth in revenue collections in the coming years will be achieved.
18. We are sure that these intricacies have not been duly
highlighted in the proposal of cadre restructuring submitted by the CBEC. Here,
it is pertinent to mention that Cadre Restructuring is for those who are
already in service & not for those who are in college and likely to join
service in future or even not taken birth. In Cadre Restructuring-2002, it
was inter alia clearly mentioned in the cabinet note that “it is alignment with
the policy of Govt. which lays down the objective of cadre review as the
achievement of congruence between functional needs of the department and
legitimate aspirations of the staff.” Accordingly, cabinet approved the Cadre Restructuring-2002
for filling-up of vacancies of all newly created posts by promotion in one go and
not through recruitment from open market. Therefore in the current cadre restructuring also, all vacancies
should be filled-up by promotions only in one go
including the cascading vacancies.
19. Further, the promotional prospects of Superintendents of
Central Excise were adversely affected due to the fixation of 6:1:2 ratio in
old Recruitment Rules giving undue benefit to one of the feeder categories
namely Appraisers of Customs. However, the said ratio has been revised to 13:2:1but
the adhoc promotions have not been regularised based on the new ratio, i.e.,
the rules existing on the date of regularisation. It is also pertinent to
resubmit that no ratio system for promotion to Group ‘A’ is mandated in our
case as per DOPT guidelines on account of the number of promotional posts being
too less. Therefore, the promotions should be affected on the basis of length
of service in Group B gazetted cadre instead of any ratio. By virtue of the
undue benefit, the Appraisers of 2002 have already been promoted to the post of
Asst. Commissioner whereas the Superintendents of 1993 are yet to be promoted.
20. The temporary posts of Asst. Commissioner have also been
created for removal of stagnation in the grade of Superintendent of Central
Excise as per our continuous demand, agitation and representations. All such
temporary posts, at least, are required to be filled-up from the Central Excise
Superintendent category only duly amending the recruitment rules without giving
even a single post to the Appraisers. If Appraisers are allowed to be promoted
against the temporary posts in 13.2.1 ratio, 2008 batch of Appraisers
(including all Appraisers as on date) will be promoted whereas only 2001 batch
Superintendents of Central Excise will become Asstt. Commissioner definitely increasing
further the demoralizing effect on Central Excise Superintendents, who are
instrumental to collect the Govt. revenue in all of three streams of indirect
tax (i.e., Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax) instead of single stream
of Customs like Appraisers.
21.
The Inspector cadre has been trifurcated by the CBEC into three categories
without any justification, i.e., Inspector of Central Excise, Preventive
Officer of Customs and Examiner of Customs (all analogous posts) recruited
through the same competitive examination under same eligibility conditions in the same organization of CBEC of the same Department of Revenue in
the same Ministry of Finance having same administrative hierarchy and
performing same nature of job of tax collection but with huge discriminatory
difference in promotional avenues (admitted by CBEC). All of these are
mentioned as “Inspector only” in the recruitment rules and other relevant
documents getting next promotion as Superintendent of Central Excise,
Superintendent of Customs and Appraiser of Customs (again all analogous posts)
respectively at group ‘B’ gazetted level performing again same nature of job.
The single cadre trifurcated at the level of Inspector is re-merged at the
level of Asstt. Commissioner (JTS group
‘A’ entry level) placing Central Excise Inspectors decades behind the Examiners
of Customs.
22.
The Central Excise stream officers work in all of the three streams of the
CBEC, i.e., Central Excise, Service Tax and Customs. On the other hand, the
Customs stream officers work only in the Customs stream but they are posted to
Central Excise and Service Tax after entry into group ‘A’. Thus, it is even
more surprising that a junior officer having worked only in the Customs stream
and having no knowledge of Central Excise or Service Tax heads his seniors of
Central Excise and Service Tax. Such a horrible situation of humiliation and discrimination
to work under an extreme junior happens only in the organization of CBEC which
is neither justifiable by any rule of law or any principle of natural justice.
23.
It is surprising to note as to how CBEC lost sight
to recommend for removal of these intra-cadre disparities in promotions existing
for decades. Since 2118 temporary posts
of Asst. Commissioner have been created for 5 years with the provision of no
further promotion to the holders of temporary post. Hence, creation of the
temporary posts will neither undo the disparities in promotions nor solve the
stagnation problem. As a result of the notification of the current cadre
restructuring of CBEC, the sanctioned strength of Group-B Gazetted and
Non-Gazetted executive officers has become 19108 and 25203 respectively having
only 479 posts of regular Asst. Commissioner available for their promotion.
Hence again, 99% of Group-B executive officers of Central Excise will retire
without getting promotion to Group-A. In accordance to the DOPT guidelines
issued on the basis of VI CPC recommendations, at least 7000 regular posts are
required to be created at Group ‘A’ entry level on functional basis, but Govt.
created only 300 new posts. Our officers
are now forced to opt for the opportunities outside and leaving the department
due to being faced the worst career prospects and inadequate pay scales. Thus,
the productivity in the department is affected negatively through the
cumulative ordeal of desperations and country continues to suffer in respect of
revenue adversely.
24. The following table shows the comparative promotion
status for analogous posts in the Revenue Department recruited through the same
examination as the ‘worst case scenario’-
Name
of the Cadre
|
Year
of Joining
|
Year
of 1st Promotion
|
Year
of 2nd Promotion
|
Inspector
of Central Excise
|
1975
|
1993
|
No
2nd Promotion
|
Preventive
Officer of Customs
|
1975
|
1996
|
2005
|
Examiner
of Customs
|
1986
|
1994
|
2005
|
Inspector
of Income Tax
|
1988
|
1995
|
2005
|
(It is well pertinent to submit
that all other categories except Central Excise Inspectors/Superintendents are
getting 4 to 6 functional promotions in
their service career)
25. Everybody in the corridors of power of CBEC is worried only
about the stature, interest & character of the IRS even for those officers
who have not yet taken birth but nobody has any worry for the career prospects
& job-satisfaction of the actual workforce (Central Excise Superintendents
& Inspectors) already collecting the major portion of the government
revenue. The DOPT Minister agreed to Sh. Punia, the Chairman of SC Commission,
to consider the proposal devising specific measures to address the problem of
stagnation of the Central Excise Superintendents & Inspectors, if referred
to DOPT. It was expected that a proposal of parity with the best placed common
entry counterparts would be mooted under consultation with the Association by
the CBEC on the lines of parity being granted to group ‘A’ officers with their
best placed counterparts. But very unfortunately, no step has been taken till
date on the issue for our officers. This shows the mind set-up of our IRS
authorities to keep our officers retiring after single promotion by not
allowing them even to enter the junior group ‘A’ whereas IRS officers have been
ensured upto 9 promotions in the latest cadre restructuring by creating the
posts at Apex, HAG+ etc. levels in higher scales even without availability of
the eligible officers and also without any functional requirement. Thus, the
following measures may kindly be taken for the Central Excise Superintendents
to improve the career prospects of these poor officers-
(1) FRAMING OF RECRUITMENT
RULES TO CREATE SEPARATE SERVICE:
As per DOPT Handbook on Recruitment Rules, the Recruitment Rules
(RRs) should be reviewed once in 5 years
vide para 3.1.5 with a view to affect such changes as are necessary to
bring them in conformity with the changed position including additions to or
reductions in the strength of the lower and higher level posts but CBEC never
implemented such instructions of DOPT. The Group-A RRs framed during 1987 were
revised during 2012 instead of every 5 years.
2. Having been grossly
aggrieved after grave suffering for thousands of silent, frustrated, depressed,
disappointed, humiliated, demoralised and anguished Superintendents of Central
Excise, we would like to express the disillusionment and heartburn of such a
large number of officers due to the malaise prevailing in their hearts
affecting their morale and work culture. The main cause of this state of
deterioration is that the Superintendents of Central Excise are getting just
one promotion in their entire service span of about 35 to 40 years after
joining the job as Inspector whereas other officers like Examiners of Customs
having joined in the same service and selected through the same all India
combined competitive examination on merit and option basis conducted by the
selection body, i.e., Staff Selection Commission, are getting 4 to 5 promotions
in the similar duration of service. More condemnable is the reason that the
Central Excise Inspectors and Preventive Officers of Customs (General,
Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribe all) are compelled to work under the
Examiners of Customs even having lower merit or selected through a later
examination (upto 20 years afterwards) despite of all Central Excise Inspectors,
Preventive Officers of Customs and Examiners of Customs having been selected
through the same all India combined competitive annual examination and
appointed in the same service of same organisation in same Department under
same Ministry to the same level of post (Promotions are made as mere simple
promotion and not on selection basis or selection post but to the cadre posts at
different levels in the same service). We have been fighting for justice as per
Rule of Law and Constitution of India for the last over three decades with no
tangible results so far due to the malafide acts of commissions & omissions
by the concerned officials. The right to live with dignity & respect has
been snatched from us.
3. Hon'ble Apex court in the case of Radhey Shyam Singh upheld
that "Direct Recruitment" made on the basis of "Zonal
Examination" conducted by SSC is contrary to Fundamental Rights. Thereby,
it was struck down and the examination on all India basis started since 1996 as
per the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court. In the year 1999, the then Director/Commissioner of DOPM made a
self speaking elaborate noting in the concerned file that it is unfair &
unjust and also unconstitutional to have separate cadres of (a) Inspector of
Central Excise (b) Preventive Officer of Customs &( c) Examiner of Customs
and also of (d)Superintendent of Central Excise (e) Superintendent of Customs
Preventive and ( f) Appraiser of Customs in the same service and should be
merged in one single cadre at each such level (just like in Income Tax).
Subsequently after his transfer however, no efforts were made though shown to
have been made (with dilatory tactics, pre-planned motives & conclusions)
without any tangible, legal and justified results by the CBEC as obvious from
the factual position submitted under forthcoming paras:
Present Hierarchy of
executive Posts in CBEC:
Level (I) Group ‘B’ – Non Gazzetted
(i) Inspector (Central Excise).
(ii) Inspector (Preventive Officer of Customs).
(iii) Inspector (Examiner of Customs).
All recruited through
one and same process.
Level (II) Group ‘B’
Gazzetted
(i) Superintendent of Central Excise
(ii) Superintendent of Customs
(iii) Appraiser of Customs
Respective promotional post for the Level (I) posts.
Level (III) Group ‘A’ entry JTS
Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service
Tax.
Single promotional post for all Level (II)
posts (filled-up based on ratio formula against DOPT provisions because number
of promotional posts is too less).
Level (IV) Group ‘A’ STS
Deputy Commissioner of
Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax.
Time scale promotional post for Group ‘A’
Asstt. Commissioner.
Level (V) Group ‘A’
Joint Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax.
Promotional post for Group ‘A’ Deputy Commissioner.
Level (VI) Group ‘A’
Addl. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax.
Time scale promotional post for Group ‘A’ Joint
Commissioner.
Level (VII) Group ‘A’
Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax.
Promotional post for Group ‘A’ Addl. Commissioner.
Level (VIII) Group ‘A’
Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax.
Promotional post for
Group ‘A’ Commissioner.
Level (IX) Group ‘A’
Member of CBEC-Promotional post for Group ‘A’ Chief Commissioner.
Level (X) Group ‘A’
Chairman of CBEC-Promotional post for Member of CBEC.
4. Two more
levels with new pay scales have been created between Level (VIII) and Level
(IX) for Group ‘A’ officers in the current cadre restructuring.
5. The rule in conformity with the Law as well
as Constitution of India is that any person lower in rank & merit and
selected through the same all India combined competitive examination conducted
on the basis of same qualification for the same level posts and having been
appointed in the same organisation/service can never become superior to the
other officer higher in rank & merit and selected through the same all India combined competitive
examination for same service in the same organisation. But the situation in the
CBEC is very astounding as the Inspectors of Central Excise of 1975 batch have
yet not been promoted to Group-A while the Preventive Officers of 1984 batch
and Examiners of 1994 batch have already
been promoted to Group-A. Also the Examiners of 1984 batch are at present Joint
Commissioner whereas the 1975 batch Inspectors of Central Excise are still
Superintendent. Thus by the wrong acts of the concerned authorities, the Superintendents/Inspectors
of Central Excise are forced to work under the junior officers recruited as
Examiner.
6. The position of stagnation in the Superintendents of Central Excise is so horrible that 99% of these officers are
forced to retire with one promotion only in the service career of 35-40 years
after joining as Inspector while their common entry counterparts are getting
5/6 promotions attaining the level of Joint Secretary. The most of the group
‘B’ gazetted officers in the Central as well as State governments are promoted
to a Senior Time Scale post while Central Excise Superintendents are promoted
(if any) merely to a Junior Time Scale post and they are also forced to work under their extreme
juniors of Customs belonging to
same cadre recruited through same examination in CBEC under same Department of
Revenue and same Ministry of Finance. It is requested that the Recruitment Rules should
be framed without trifurcating the single cadre at Inspector as well as
Superintendent level prescribing the qualifying services as below in strict
consonance of OM No. AB-14017/61/2008-Estt.(RR) dt. 24.03.09 of DOPT (not being
followed by CBEC) which stipulates the promotion of Inspector completing 12, 17 & 20
years of service to the grade of Joint Commissioner, Additional Commissioner
& Commissioner respectively. The validity of this OM was also admitted by CBEC during the
presentation of cadre restructuring proposal on 18.01.11. No need also to
submit that the said qualifying services/residency periods have been prescribed
by the DOPT with the due diligence and application of mind. As per the said OM,
the residency periods are prescribed as under-
(i) 2 years for promotion to a post with a grade pay of Rs.
4,800/- after joining as Inspector.
(ii) 7 years for promotion to a post with a grade pay of Rs.
6,600/- after joining as Inspector (There is no justification of promoting an
officer from a grade pay of Rs. 5,400/- to 5,400/-. It is also submit-worthy
that the most of the group ‘B’ gazetted officers including CSS are being
promoted to a senior group ‘A’ post instead of junior group ‘A’ in Central as
well as State governments.).
(iii) 12 years for promotion to a post with a grade pay of Rs.
7,600/- after joining as Inspector.
(iv) 17 years for promotion to a post with a grade pay of Rs.
8,700/- after joining as Inspector.
(v) 20 years for promotion to a post with a grade pay of Rs.
10,000/- after joining as Inspector.
(vi) and so on.
7. Keeping in view the extraordinarily acute stagnation of the
Central Excise executive officers, it is also required to incorporate a
permanent provision in the RRs at every level framed on the above lines
in addition to the above qualifying services/residency periods to promote (even in-situ or
otherwise) the officer
automatically to the next higher grade, if his/her stagnation in a grade
reaches 1½ times of qualifying service.
8. It is also submitted that the common entry counterparts of
the Superintendents of Central Excise are easily reaching PB4
levels (Addl. Commissioner/Commissioner & Director/Joint Secretary)
getting 5/6 promotions. 1994 Examiners as well as Inspectors of Income Tax have
long back entered group ‘A’ and 1997 Assistants have long back entered into
senior group ‘A’ while our Inspector of 1975 is still waiting even to enter the
junior group ‘A’. 1985 Assistant of Rajya Sabha Secretariat has long back been
promoted to the post of Director. The parity with the other better placed
counterparts to our officers is the need of the time in the interest of the
Govt. revenue and is very well possible by framing the RRs in the manner as submitted
in the preceding para or by adopting the measures like time bound
promotions/scales (grant of time scale to our officers after every 7 years was
also recommended by CBEC to 6th CPC), separate service,
notional promotions, supernumerary posts, in-situ promotions etc. The promotional
avenues available to counterparts of other departments vis-a-vis the officers
joining the job as Inspector of Central
Excise are furnished as below:
1. PROMOTIONAL
AVENUES OF INSPECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
(1) Inspector
(2) Superintendent
(3) Asstt. Commissioner-JTS (only around 1%)
{ONLY ONE PROMOTION barring 1%}
2. PROMOTIONAL
AVENUES OF EXAMINER OF CUSTOMS
(1) Examiner
(2) Appraiser
(3) Asstt. Commissioner
(4) Deputy Commissioner
(5) Joint Commissioner
(6) Addl. Commissioner
{5 PROMOTIONS}
3. PROMOTIONAL
AVENUES OF INSPECTOR OF INCOME TAX
(1) Inspector
(2) Income Tax Officer
(3) Asstt. Commissioner
(4) Deputy Commissioner
(5) Joint Commissioner
(6) Addl. Commissioner
(7) Commissioner
{6 PROMOTIONS}
PROMOTIONAL
AVENUES OF ASSISTANT OF CSS
(1) Assistant
(2) Section Officer
(3) Under Secretary (STS-equivalent to 2 promotions)
(4) Deputy Secretary
(5) Director
(6) Joint Secretary
{EQUIVALENT TO 6 PROMOTIONS}
PROMOTIONAL
AVENUES OF ASSISTANT OF RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT
(1) Assistant
(2) Section Officer
(3) Under Secretary (STS-equivalent to 2 promotions)
(4) Deputy Secretary
(5) Director
(6) Joint Secretary
{EQUIVALENT TO 6 PROMOTIONS}
9. During the year 1978, Appraisers of Customs (A. K. Chatterjee and others)
filed a writ petition before the Apex Court for the reason that
some of their counterparts from Central Excise (Superintendents of Central
Excise) junior to them by 1 or 1½ half years in the service have been
promoted ahead of them. They wanted that Recruitment Rules should be framed
& promotions should be done on the basis of length of service in the feeder
cadre. As per the directions of Apex Court, Govt.
framed Indian Customs and Central Excise (Group-A) Recruitment Rules in
1987 based on length of service in the feeder cadre (i.e., to allow promotions
to the post of Asstt. Commissioner based on a common seniority list on the
basis of length of service of the officers belonging to three feeder
categories). This was challenged by the then office bearers of
AIFCEGEO (now AIACEGEO) & AIFCEEO (now AICEIA) in the Supreme Court
jointly under WP(C) No. 306/1988. While the matter was pending in the
Supreme Court for decision, the CBEC made a deceptive proposal dt.
08.10.1988 in total disregard of the facts by distributing the posts within the
Customs and Central Excise on the basis of the number of Custom
Service posts and Central Excise Service posts of Asstt. Commissioner at group
A entry level. Whereas the fact is that the Customs Service Group ‘A’ and
Central Excise Service Group ‘A’ were merged w.e.f. 15th August,
1959 into a single service of Customs and Central Excise Service Group
‘A’. The Apex Court vide WP No 306/1988 without any judicial
determination accepted the proposal of CBEC of 6:1:2 ratio for promotion to
Group-A to amend the Group-A RRs in 1998.
10.
The Superintendents of Customs Preventive filed O.A. No. 489/1999 in
Bombay CAT. The CAT directed in July, 2001 to
consider the grievances of the Superintendents of Customs. Against this
decision of CAT, the Appraisers of Customs filed Appeal before the High Court
of Bombay. The Bombay High Court said that Bombay CAT
didn’t have any jurisdiction of passing the orders of July,
2001. Superintendents of Customs filed an Appeal against the orders
of the Bombay High Court in the Supreme Court of India. WP(C) No. 385/2010 was also filed by
AIACEGEO (through Shri Vimal Kumar) in the Apex
Court. The Supreme Court delivered the following judgment
by consensus in the Writ Petition (Civil) No. 385 of 2010:-
“We
have heard learned
counsels for the parties in Civil Appeal No. 1198
of 2005 and Writ Petition (Civil) No. 385 of 2010.
It has been brought to our notice that the Union
of India in terms of our previous order/directions dated 22nd
November, 2010 and 06th December, 2010, has filed an affidavit
in Civil Appeal No. 1198 of 2005, inter alia, stating, that it
has initiated the process of reviewing the
Recruitment Rules, 1987 for promotion from Group 'B' posts to Group 'A'
posts. The entire scheme is being re-looked and worked out at the
departmental level in consultation with an expert body including the Department
of Personnel and the entire process is likely to be completed by 31st December,
2011.
In the aforesaid background, we deem
it proper and in the interest of all parties concerned to dispose of both the
Civil Appeal as also the Writ Petition without expressing any opinion on the
merits of the impugned judgment or the writ petition
but with the following directions:
1. All the 3 groups of officers in
the feeder categories, i.e., (i) Superintendents of Central Excise; (ii)
Superintendents of Customs (Preventive); and (iii) Customs Appraisers,
may make representations to the Union of India
suggesting the changes which according to them should be made
in the Recruitment Rules for their promotion to Group-A post of Assistant
Commissioner (Central Excise & Customs).
2. The Union of India shall
duly consider all such representations including those made before it in light
of the subsequent development in the cadre strength
of the 3 feeder categories of group-B
services and amend/revise the Recruitment Rules
including altering the existing ratio to secure just
and fair representation of all the 3 feeder categories.
3. Union of India shall try
to complete the entire process by 31st December, 2011, uninfluenced by any
observations made in the previous judgment of this Court in All India
Federation of Central Excise vs. Union of India &Ors. [(1997) 1 SCC 520],
in which the existing ratio was approved as also
the observations in the impugned judgment dated 19th
December, 2003 of the High Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1324 of 2002 with
regard to the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative
Tribunal.
4. Having
perused one of the Office Orders (No. 51/2011 dated 18th March, 2011), whereby
some officers were promoted from Group 'B' to the grade of Assistant
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise in the
Pay Band 3 with Grade Pay of Rs.5400/- on purely ad hoc
basis, we direct that all such ad hoc promotions shall abide by the final
decision to be taken by the Department in terms of this order”.
11. As per Apex court decision dt.
3.8.2011, CBEC in its board meeting held on dt.16.9.2011
took the decision for preparation of
RRs by altering existing ratio for 3 feeder
cadres to 13:2:1 and also
decided to make regularization of all adhoc promotions pending since
97 in old ratio under the provisions of previous RRs. The
new RRs were notified on 13.9.2012. The prayer of CBEC for amendment
of Supreme Court order dated 03.08.11 seeking clarification to make
regularisation of all adhoc promotions pending since 1997 in old ratio was
rejected by Apex Court on 30.3.2012. In the old Recruitment Rules, the
ratio of 6:1:2 was fixed very unscientifically and the same was not fixed
considering the sanctioned strength of three feeder categories for which during
the period of 1987 to 2011 one of the feeder categories namely Appraiser took the undue benefit in getting early
promotion than the seniors of other two feeder categories. The Recruitment
Rules, therefore, are required to be framed to grant promotion on the basis of
common seniority list of feeder categories instead of any ratio system. The
ratio system is also against the DOPT guidelines because the number of
promotional posts is too less.
12. The final recruitment rules,
therefore, be framed by prescribing the residency periods as per para 6 and 7
above. The draft on recruitment rules is enclosed herewith as Annexure-1.
(2) DIRECT PROMOTION TO
STS POST:
The most of group ‘B’
gazetted officers in the Central as well as State governments are being
promoted directly to a Senior Time Scale (STS) post with Grade Pay of Rs.
6600/- in PB-3 including CSS, CPWD, Railway Board, CSSS, AFHQ, Rajya Sabha Secretariat,
Forest services, Police services, Foreign Services, Engineering services, State
services etc., the Group ‘B’ gazetted officers are being promoted while Central Excise
Superintendents are being promoted (if any) merely to a Junior Time Scale (JTS) post with Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- in
PB-3. The Superintendents of Central Excise (Group ‘B’ Gazetted post) should
also be granted promotion directly to a Senior Time Scale post with Grade Pay
of Rs. 6600/- in PB-3 to maintain parity with similarly placed employees of
other departments.
2.
Not only the promotion directly to STS post, the counterparts of Central Excise
Superintendents are also given benefit of seniority in group ‘A’ at many places
in lieu of the service rendered by them in group ‘B’. At many places like
various services in Railways, Administrative Services, Police Services, State
Services etc., the group ‘B’ gazetted officers are allowed the weightage of
minimum of 4 years at the time of entry into group ‘A’ also giving them the due
benefit of seniority in lieu of the service rendered by them in the group ‘B’.
For example, the officers of Provincial Services in Southern States enter into
IAS in a grade pay of Rs. 6600/- within 8 years with 4 years of seniority
benefit while the Central Excise Superintendents are unable to enter into IRS
in a lower grade pay of Rs. 5400/ even after serving for 35-40 years. They
enter (if any) into IRS in a grade pay of Rs. 5400/- only and retire at same
level without any weightage for seniority in group ‘A’.
3.
The rationale behind such a provision of weightage or direct promotion to STS
group ‘A’ is based on the fact of the promotee officers having gained rich job
experience at the time of working as group ‘B’ officer as compared to direct
recruit group ‘A’ officers. But very unfortunately, the Central Excise
Superintendents are not being given the said benefit despite of being served
for the longest period in group ‘B’ as compared to any other category of the
group ‘B’ employees of the Govt. of India. They are not allowed the benefit of
their rich experience even despite of the Adjudication Orders also being
prepared by them for the Commissioner level officers.
4.
Before the enactment of Indian Customs & Central Excise Service Group ‘A’
Rules, 1987, the group ‘B’ gazetted executive officers in CBEC were allowed
five increments in their group ‘A’ pay scale on promotion to group ‘A’ since
senior time scale was not available at that point of time. It is also worth to mention that the common
entry counterparts of CSS are not only being promoted directly to a STS post
after Section Officer (analogous to Superintendent) but also reaching the level
of Joint Secretary (GP-Rs. 10000/-). The position in CPWD is even more
interesting where an officer with a grade pay of Rs. 4600/- is directly being
promoted to a post with a grade pay of Rs. 6600/- (STS) and further directly to
a post with the grade pay of Rs. 8700/- from a post with a grade pay of Rs.
6600/-. Thus, they don’t need to serve on a post with a grade pay of Rs.
4800/-, 5400/- and 7600/- for promotion to the post with a grade pay of 8700/-
after entry into a post with merely a grade pay of Rs. 4200/-.
5.
Further; the Central Excise Inspectors and Assistants of the Central
Secretariat Services (CSS), being analogous posts, are recruited through a
common entrance examination conducted by the Staff Selection Commission and in
a common scale of pay. Once upon a time, the pay scale of the Assistants was
lower than the pay scale of the Central Excise Inspectors but was upgraded at
par later on. Like it, the pay scale of the Section Officers was also lower
than the pay scale of the Central Excise Superintendents once upon a time but
was upgraded at par later on. Eventually, the Inspectors are promoted to the
rank of Superintendent whereas the Assistants are promoted as Section Officers.
The posts of Central Excise Superintendent and Section officer of CSS are
analogous, yet the similarity ends here.
Section Officers are promoted directly to the Senior Time Scale post
with a grade pay of Rs. 6600/- and reach upto the level of Joint Secretary in
the grade pay of Rs. 10000/- whereas the Central Excise Superintendents are
promoted, if at all, to the Junior Time Scale post merely with a grade pay of
Rs. 5400/-.
6.
IAS and IPS are the most elite services in the country and the group ‘B’
officers are provided weightage even on promotion to these services in lieu of
the service rendered in group ‘B’. But nothing such happens to the Central
Excise Superintendents at the time of entry (if any) to IRS, the same also
being one of the elite services of the Govt. of India.
7.
It is also worth to mention that the Superintendents are not only discharging
all functions relating to assessment, investigation & intelligence,
drafting of SCN and even adjudication but have also been conferred with the
judicial powers of recording statements of various persons in terms of Section
14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 108 of the Customs Act,
1962. The statements tendered before the
Central Excise Superintendent have a legal binding and are treated as a valid
piece of evidence by various courts including the Hon’ble Supreme Court just
like the statements tendered before a Magistrate. They also have the
adjudication powers pertaining to the cases of their level. However, though the Central Excise
Superintendents are performing more responsible work functions as compared to
other group ‘B’ gazetted counterparts yet they are facing the worst career
prospects instead of being given better treatment. They are being maltreated
despite of being the ‘backbone of the government revenue’. In the actual terms,
though they are the ‘backbone of the government’ on account of being
responsible to earn the finance for the government yet are being totally
ignored in every matter.
8. Like CSS, there is a provision of
direct recruitment in Group-B non-gazetted and Group-B gazetted posts in CBEC.
Hence like CSS , the Group-B gazetted officers of Central Excise and Customs
are required to be promoted directly to a post having senior time scale and the
Group-B gazetted officers completing 1½ of qualifying service be promoted
to STS posts as it was done in CSS
during 1999. CBEC also recommended to VIth CPC for direct promotion of Group B
gazetted officers to STS posts, separate service, time scale after every 7
years etc. were
also recommended by CBEC to 6th CPC vide F.No.A.26017/147 /06-Ad.II.A Dt. 04.01.07 for these officers.
9.
In view of the above, all of the Group ‘B’ gazetted officers of Govt. of India
including the Central Excise Superintendents also should kindly be promoted
directly to a STS post like many other group ‘B’ officers of the Govt. of India
by giving due weightage of the service rendered in group ‘B’ and to bring
uniformity in promotions for all for the sake of justice.
10.
Hence, it is requested
that the study group may kindly be pleased to recommend for promotion of Superintendents of Central excise directly to
a senior group ‘A’ post (STS) like many other counterparts of them.
(3) INTRA ORGANISATIONAL PARITY:
The
officers belonging to the Inspector cadre, i.e., Inspector of Central Excise,
Preventive Officer and Examiner of Customs are recruited through one & the
same all India combined competitive examination with the same eligibility
qualifications in one & the same organization of CBEC of one & the same
department of Revenue performing one & the same nature of duties under one
& the same administrative hierarchy under the same Ministry of Finance. All
of these three streams belonging to one & the same single cadre of
Inspector have also been shown as Inspector only in the Recruitment Rules and
other related documents. The Inspectors and Superintendents of Central Excise
are uniformed executive officers bearing Ashok symbol on their uniform while
the Examiners and Appraisers of Customs are not entitled to wear the
uniform.
2.
But this single cadre of Inspector has been trifurcated by the CBEC into three
streams of Inspector of Central Excise, Preventive Officer and Examiner of
Customs with different rates of promotions without any justification re-merging
at the level of the post of Asstt. Commissioner. This merger at the level of
Asstt. Commissioner again proves that the basic cadre of Inspector has been
trifurcated into above stated three streams by CBEC without any valid reason,
ground or justification.
3.
The Inspectors and Superintendents of Central Excise also work in all of three
streams of CBEC namely Central Excise, Service Tax and Customs while the
Examiners and Appraisers of Customs work only in the single stream of Customs.
But very unfortunately, the officers entering the job at the level of
Inspectors of Central Excise and having multi-expertise skill are forced to
work under their juniors of Customs even by 20 years entering the job at the
same level due to faulty, biased, discriminatory and unjustified promotional
policy as well as Recruitment Rules.
4.
As a result, the Examiners of Customs belonging to the year of 1994 have
already become Asstt. Commissioner while
the Inspectors of Central Excise of the year 1975 are still waiting to become
Asstt. Commissioner. Not only it, the Examiners of Customs belonging to the
year 1988 and 1984 have also become Deputy Commissioner and Join Commissioner
respectively. Thus, an officer senior even by 2 decades belonging to the stream
of Inspector of Central Excise is forced to work under his junior belonging to
the stream of the Examiner of Customs. 99% of the officers joining as
Inspectors of Central Excise are retiring after getting only one promotion in a
service career of 35-40 years while the Examiners of Customs are reaching the
level of Additional Commissioner after getting 5 promotions. The promotional
hierarchy of both of the categories is mentioned as below-
A.
Promotional hierarchy of Examiners of Customs
(1) Examiner
(2) Appraiser
(3) Asstt.
Commissioner
(4) Deputy Commissioner
(5) Joint Commissioner
(6) Addl.
Commissioner
(Total 5 promotions with a fair chance
of 6th promotion)
B. Promotional hierarchy of
Inspector of Central Excise
(1)
Inspector
(2)
Superintendent
(3) Asstt.
Commissioner (only 1%)
(Total 1 promotion in 99% of
the cases)
5. Promotion is an incentive to the working personnel. Hence, the policy
of promotion should be designed in such a manner so that an officer can expect
his/her progress within a schedule time frame. This principle is absolutely
absent in CBEC for the officers except Group A. Since inception of the CBEC in
thirties, a series of unscientific, irregular and unjust mismanagement like
amalgamated service at the Group “A” level and trifurcated service for the
Group “B” “C” and “D” category since 1959 has done gross injustice particularly
with the lower officers including Group B executive officers of Central Excise.
Merger of Group “A” services has totally shut down the progress of Central
Excise employees. A large number of Superintendents of Central Excise are to
work in their own organisation under the control of junior Customs officers
promoted early and posted as Assistant Commissioner in Central Excise wing.
These junior officers drawn from Customs wing supervise the work of
Superintendents of Central Excise who by the time even with 20 years of experience
at credit are yet Group “B” officers.
6. In order to introduce a systematic and scientific policy of promotion
both for the Group “A” and “B” Executive officers, the promotional scope for
them is only possible by increasing number of Group “A” posts. But out of the
total sanction of Group “A” posts, 50% are going to the direct recruit Group
“A” officers. The rest of 50% are again being distributed between the Central
Excise and Customs wings. Hence, the scope for promotion of Group “B” Central
Excise executive officers to Group “A” has become miserably narrowed. To keep
parity with the scientific management, the ratios between the Gr. “A”, “B” and
“C” should be meticulously fixed up. This ration can be fixed by increasing
more post in Group “A” entry cadre by reducing percentage of direct recruitment
from 50% to maximum 10% and also by reservation of percentage quota at all the
Group “A” levels, otherwise all promotional vacancies created on account of the
retirement of the promotee officers of Central Excise (being promoted to Group
A at the fag end of the career, if any) will go to younger generation of direct
Group A as well as Customs regularly diminishing the quota of particularly
promotee officers of Central Excise.
7. Great framers of
the Constitution of India, while framing the Article 309, were under a wrong
impression expecting that the top bureaucrats in free India would be unlike to
the colonial bureaucrats. Unfortunately, the attitude of the bureaucrats in
general has not changed even now. Instead of showing due respect to the Rule of
Law & Justice, they act in an awfully irresponsible manner. Therefore, this
desperate attempt is being made now to approach the Hon’ble 7th CPC for
the sake of justice as per the Rule of Law and the Constitution of India.
Besides the issue highlighted above, there are other aspects to be looked into
like discrimination in the prospects of promotions of officers joining particularly
at Central Excise Inspector level. The bureaucrats in the CBEC take away all
the benefits for themselves depriving lower classes of their legitimate rights,
due interests and social status. In a democracy, the legislature works with the
commitment and motive of “maximum good of maximum people”. But our bureaucrats,
very unfortunately, work with the only motive “all the good for self, ego &
power”.
8. There appears to be
no sincere efforts by the bureaucrats of the CBEC to eliminate the disparities
in promotions of the officers belonging to the basic executive feeder cadre to
give equal opportunity for promotions to all Group B officers. The issue should
have been settled years ago but for the irresponsible, indifferent &
apathetic behaviour of the CBEC authorities having no concern for the honour of
the Constitution and dignity of the employees. By sincere efforts and
application of mind with unbiased approach, it would be very easy to find a
justified, lawful & Constitutional solution to the unreasonably created &
long pending issue of disparities in the promotions of the officers belonging
to the basic executive feeder cadre.
9. As already
submitted, the Inspectors of Central Excise, Preventive Officers of Customs and
Examiners of Customs are recruited on the basis of merit- cum-option in through
combined competitive examination conducted by a statutory body, i.e., Staff
Selection Commission. All of the three classes of officers are appointed to single
cadre of Inspector with different recruitment rules in the same organisation of
CBEC under the same Department of Revenue in the different Customs Houses and
Central Excise Commissionerates in the same level of grade, salary etc. No need
to submit that they all are the comparable and analogous posts. They are,
thereafter, promoted to the higher cadre posts available in the same
Commissionerate/Customs House. This policy of having restrained the promotion prospects
and keeping promotional posts confined to the particular Commissionerate/Customs
House amounts to be the policy of reservation, while there is no scope for such
policy of reservation under the Constitution of India except for the Schedule
Caste/Schedule Tribe only. Depriving the senior eligible officers from
promotion by such a policy is not only unjust & unfair but also illegal &
unconstitutional. There is no provision in the Constitution of India to make
rules by benefitting one unduly/illegally at the cost of others. However if
such situation happens, it can and should be rectified immediately in the interest
of justice and rule of law.
10. The principles
laid down in the cases of (i) Union of India versus Virpal Singh on 30-01-1997
(ii) All India Station Masters Association versus General Manager Central
Railway AIR 1962 SC 284 (iii) High Court of Calcutta versus Anil Kumar Rao AIR
1962 SC 1704, 1963 (1) SCR 437 (iv) Ajit Singh vrs State of Punjab and (v)
Indra Sawhney Vrs Union of India (1992) 3 SCC217 para 845 ; AIR 1993 SC 477 by
a 9 Judge Bench are:
“Inequality of such
opportunity for promotion as between citizens holding different posts in the
same grade may, therefore, be an infringement of Article 16 of the Constitution
of India.”
“Equality of
opportunity in the matter of promotion means that all employees holding posts
in the same grade shall be equally eligible for being considered in the merit
for appointment to the higher grade.”
“There would be no
discrimination and there is no violation of Article 14 & 16 (1) of the Constitution
of India where the quota rule of recruitment has no connection with the rule of
seniority”.
11. Thus, no special
treatment except as provided under Article 16(4) &16 (4A) of the
Constitution of India can be given to any citizen who are otherwise comparable
and form a class.
12. The Central Excise Inspectors, Preventive Officers and
Examiners form the same class of Inspector as all of them are also mentioned as
Inspector in their individual/separate recruitment rules under the same
organisation. They are comparable and non-detachable as their recruitment to the
post of Inspector is made through a single combined competitive examination
conducted by the Staff Selection Commission. Whatever happens, the basic
principle of rule of law is that everything else being same, any person lower
in merit in the same exam or selected through the later examination cannot
become superior to other person being higher in the merit in the same exam or
selected through an earlier examination (being applicable for General vrs
General, Schedule Caste vrs Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe vrs Schedule
Tribe). Thus, base cadre parity (in r/o executive officers) for the purpose of
promotion to Group ‘A’ is the only justified & legal way to remove the
disparities among common entry counterparts, i.e., Inspectors of Central Excise,
Preventive Officers and Examiners belonging to same cadre of Inspector under
the same organisation of CBEC.
13. In view of the, the measures are required be
taken to bring parity at least among the intra-organisational group B
counterparts in CBEC to undo the injustice being meted out to the Central
Excise executive category by being forced to work under their extreme juniors
of Customs.
14.
It is, therefore, requested to take
immediate measures to grant the intra-organisational parity to the Central
Excise executive officers with the counterparts of Customs to undo the
injustice, disparity and discrimination meted out to the former category.
(4) INTRA DEPARTMENTAL
PARITY
The
officers belonging to the Inspector cadre of Central Excise as well as Income
Tax are recruited through one & the same all India combined competitive
examination with the same eligibility qualifications in one & the same Department
of Revenue performing one & the same nature of duties of tax collection
(Indirect tax by former category and Direct tax by latter category) under one
& the same administrative hierarchy under the same Ministry of Finance. The
Inspectors and Superintendents of Central Excise are uniformed executive
officers bearing Ashok symbol on their uniform while the Income Tax Inspectors
and Income Tax Officers are not entitled to wear the uniform.
2.
The Inspectors of Income Tax belonging to the year of 1994 have already become
Asstt. Commissioner while the Inspectors of Central Excise of the year 1975 are
still waiting to become Asstt. Commissioner. Not only it, the Income Tax
Inspectors are reaching the level of Commissioner (PB4 post) and the most of
them are easily becoming Addl. Commissioner (also PB4 post) whereas 99% of
Central Excise Inspectors are retiring on PB2 post of Superintendent after
getting only one promotion. Only 1% of Central Excise Inspectors are able to
get the PB3 post of JTS Group ‘A’ namely Asstt. Commissioner at the fag end of
the career. The promotional hierarchy of both of the categories is mentioned as
below-
A. Promotional hierarchy of Income
Tax Inspector
(1) Inspector
(2) Income Tax
Officer
(3) Asstt.
Commissioner
(4) Deputy
Commissioner
(5) Joint
Commissioner
(6) Addl.
Commissioner
(7) Commissioner
(Total 6 promotions)
B. Promotional hierarchy of Inspector
of Central Excise
(1)
Inspector
(2)
Superintendent
(3) Asstt. Commissioner
(only 1%)
(Total 1 promotion in 99%
of the cases)
3. It is also worth to submit
that the IRS officers of CBEC were granted parity in promotions with their
counterpart IRS officers of CBDT in the last cadre restructuring of 2001 but no
such measure were taken for the Central Excise executive officers namely
Central Excise Inspectors and Superintendents to grant parity with the
counterparts of CBDT.
4. In view of the above, it is
requested to take immediate measures to grant the intra-departmental parity to
the Central Excise executive officers with the counterparts of CBDT to undo the
injustice, disparity and discrimination meted out to the former category.
(5) INETR DEPARTMENTAL
PARITY
The officers belonging to the
Assistant cadre of CSS etc. are recruited through one & the same all India
combined competitive examination with the same eligibility qualifications in the
same pay scale. The Inspectors and Superintendents of Central Excise are
uniformed executive officers bearing Ashok symbol on their uniform while the Income
Tax Inspectors whereas the officers of CSS etc. are not entitled to wear the
uniform.
2. The Assistants of CSS belonging
to the year of 1997 have already become Under Secretary (equivalent to Deputy
Commissioner), a STS post, while the Inspectors of Central Excise of the year
1975 are still waiting to become Asstt. Commissioner, a JTS post. Not only it, the
Assistants of CSS are reaching the level of Joint Secretary (PB4 post) and the
most of them are easily becoming Director (also PB4 post) whereas 99% of
Central Excise Inspectors are retiring on PB2 post of Superintendent after
getting only one promotion. Only 1% of Central Excise Inspectors are able to
get the PB3 post of JTS Group ‘A’ namely Asstt. Commissioner at the fag end of
the career. The Assistants of CSS of the year of 1985 have already become
Deputy Secretary (equivalent to Joint Commissioner). Like it, the Assistant of
Rajya Sabha Secretariat of the year of 1985 have already become Director
(equivalent to Addl. Commissioner) The promotional hierarchy of the above
categories is mentioned as below-
A. Promotional hierarchy of
Assistant of CSS
(1) Assistant
(2) Section
Officer
(3) Under Secretary (STS post,
equivalent to 2 promotions)
(4) Deputy Secretary
(5) Director
(6) Joint
Secretary
(Total equivalent to 6
promotions)
B. Promotional hierarchy of Inspector of Central
Excise
(1)
Inspector
(2)
Superintendent
(3) Asstt. Commissioner,
JTS post (only 1%)
(Total 1 promotion in 99%
of the cases)
C. Promotional hierarchy of Assistant of Rajya Sabha Secretariat
(1) Assistant
(2) Section Officer
(3) Under Secretary (STS post,
equivalent to 2 promotions)
(4) Deputy Secretary
(5) Director
(6) Joint
Secretary
(Total equivalent to 6
promotions)
3.
It is reiterated with due regards that our officers are retiring only with
single promotion at a PB2 post in the career of 35-40 years after entering the
job as Inspector of Central Excise in PB2 while our counterparts of CSS, CSSS,
Rajya Sabha Secretariat, CBDT etc. recruited in PB2 are easily attaining the
PB4 levels after getting 5/6 promotions despite of our officers being performed
hazardous & arduous duties during the course of discharging executive as
well as quasi-judicial functions taking every risk on life of self & family
on account of countering with the white collared criminals, habitual revenue
offenders & dreaded hardcore smugglers alongwith tremendous administrative
pressures.
4.
Govt. has adopted measures to bring parity, functional or non-functional, among
common entry group ‘A’ officers but no such measures are being taken for group
‘B’ officers. As already submitted, the IRS officers of CBEC got the parity
with their common entry counterparts of CBDT in the last cadre restructuring
and with other better placed group ‘A’ common entry counterparts including IAS
in the current cadre restructuring. Every effort is also being made to promote
group ‘A’ officers of CBEC within qualifying service but no such effort has
ever been made to promote Central Excise group ‘B’ executive officers in
consonance of DOPT guidelines.
5.
On account of no efforts being made to bring group ‘B’ common entry
counterparts at par, there is huge discriminatory disparity between Central
Excise group ‘B’ executive officers and other counterparts resulting in huge
discriminatory difference between their salaries, pension and other
pre/post-retirement benefits.
6.
It is very necessary to take some concrete steps to bring Central Excise group
‘B’ executive officers at par with their best placed common entry counterparts
of CSS etc. on the lines of group ‘A’. Otherwise the Central Excise executive
officers shall keep working under their juniors even of Customs recruited in
the same cadre of Inspector in the same organisation of Central Board of Excise
& Customs (CBEC).
7. The parity, functional or even non-functional, with the common
entry counterparts may be adopted by taking the measures like below-
(a) Time bound
promotions/scales: Time scales
after every 7 years were also recommended by CBEC to 6th CPC
vide F.No.A.26017/147 /06-Ad.II.A Dt. 04.01.07 as one of the measures for these officers. No posts will be required to be created for the grant of time
scale after every 7 years.
(b) Notional promotions
granting batch to batch parity with the best placed common entry counterparts
like CSS etc. There already exist so many legal verdicts in the favour of
various employees of many other organizations on notional promotions.
(c) Creation of
supernumerary posts which will be personal to the officer at each level of
the promotion and will be abolished with the retirement of the officer. There
already exist so many legal verdicts in the favour of various employees of many
other organizations on supernumerary posts.
(d) Creation of separate
service: It was also recommended to
6th CPC by CBEC vide F.No.A.26017/147 /06-Ad.II.A Dt. 04.01.07 as one
of the measures. The draft RR’s for
separate service have already been submitted to the CBEC by the Association.
The separate service for group ‘B’ officers has also been recommended on
various occasions by the CBEC and also by the IRS Officers Association. This
may be created by taking all of the temporary posts as well as regular posts at
group ‘A’ entry level by upgrading these to STS (with the provision of
promoting Superintendents directly to STS+half of existing STS posts+additional
posts at each level in proportion to CSS.
(e) Direct promotion to
higher post/s: Customs Ministerial officers are being promoted as
Appraiser without working even for a single day on feeder post of Examiner in
CBEC. Likewise, our officers may also kindly be promoted directly to the higher
posts at par with common entry counterparts.
(f) In-situ promotions
(requiring no creation of posts) after completion of residency periods
as prescribed by the DOPT and explained under the forthcoming sub para (i).
(g) Batch to batch functional upgradation at par with the best placed common entry
counterparts.
(h) Batch to batch non-functional upgradation at par with the
best placed common entry counterparts like CSS etc. (also requiring no creation of posts) based on
the precedent of DOPT OM No. AB.14017/64/2008-Estt.(RR) dt. 24.04.09 granting
NFU to other group ‘A’ officers at par with IAS.
(i) Re-framing the
recruitment rules prescribing the qualifying services in consonance of the DOPT
OM No. AB-14017/61/2008-Estt.(RR) dt. 24.03.09 without trifurcating the
cadre at group ‘B’ non-gazetted/group ‘B’ gazetted level. This OM stipulates the promotion
of the Inspector grade to the grade of Joint Commissioner, Additional
Commissioner & Commissioner respectively after completion of 12, 17 &
20 years of service. The validity of this OM was also not questioned by CBEC
during the presentation of cadre restructuring proposal on 18.01.11 but CBEC
showed its inability to implement the same due to the want of the required
number of vacancies/posts. Regarding the want of the required number of
vacancies/posts, it is requested that the
officers may kindly be granted in-situ promotions after completion of the
prescribed service (also requiring
no creation of posts) independent of cadre restructuring. A little
deviation from the above mentioned DOPT guidelines, already framed with due
diligence & application of mind by DOPT, may be understood but the
non-implementation of the same at all is never understandable. If the grant of
the prescribed grade is not possible within 20 years, we may be granted the
same after completion of 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 or even 30 years (after completion of 1½ times of qualifying
service based on the precedent of CSS of promoting all the Section Officers
to the STS post of Under Secretary after completion of 1½ times of qualifying
service in 1999).
8.
The claim of the Central Excise Superintendents becomes even stronger on
account of the judicial powers granted to them to adjudicate the relevant cases
and recording statements like a Magistrate under Section 14 of Central Excise
Act and Section 108 of Customs Act having validity even before the Supreme
Court. Not only it, the Adjudication Orders are also being prepared by them for
the Commissioner level officers. No such powers have been granted to any Group
‘B’ Gazetted officer of the Govt. of India.
9. Keeping in view the above
submissions, it is requested that the due steps may kindly be taken to devise
the specific scheme (by means of functional or even non-functional financial
upgradation) for bringing the Central Excise group ‘B’ executive officers
at par with their best placed common entry counterparts like CSS etc. on batch
to batch basis after entry into group B non-gazetted or equivalent grade to
undo the injustice, disparity and discrimination meted out to the former
category.
(6) MERGER
OF THREE GROUP ‘B’ EXECUTIVE NON GAZETTED AND ALSO GROUP ‘B’ EXECUTIVE GAZETTED
STREAMS INTO ONE:
The
Inspectors of Central Excise, Preventive Officers and Examiners of Customs all
are mentioned as Inspector only (belonging to one & the same single cadre
of Inspector) in the recruitment rules. The Central Excise Inspector is also
mentioned as Inspector of Land Customs in the recruitment rules. Thus, he/she doesn’t only perform the duties
relating to Central Excise & Service Tax but also performs the duties relating
to Customs. All of above 3 non-gazetted categories of Inspector are promoted to
the post of Superintendent of Central Excise & Land Customs, Superintendent
of Customs and Appraiser of Customs respectively at gazetted level and
re-merged as Asstt. Commissioner at JTS group ‘A’ entry level belonging to one
& the same single cadre. But the Inspector of Central Excise & Land
Customs is placed far behind the Examiner during this process. As a result, the
Inspector of Central Excise & Land Customs becomes junior even by decades
to the Inspector (Examiner) of same year despite of being recruited to one
& the same cadre. As a consequence, the officers joining as Inspector in
1975 are still waiting to enter into group ‘A’ JTS while the Examiner of 1992
or even latter has already entered into the group ‘A’ STS. It is also well
pertinent to mention again that the Examiner of 1984 has already become Joint
Commissioner. This injustice & discrimination is required to be undone
immediately by granting the parity in promotions to the former category with
the later one keeping their relative seniority intact after common entry into
the job.
2.
Not only the recruitment rules but also the merger of above 3 categories at
group ‘A’ entry level prove that all of these relate to one & same single
cadre. Despite of it, there is huge difference in their promotional avenues
placing the officers recruited as Central Excise Inspector at the worst
position to force them working under their extreme juniors of Customs against all
norms. This extraordinary situation of discrimination, disparity &
injustice happens only in the CBEC under the Govt. of India. As far as the
ratio system for entry into group ‘A’ from group ‘B’ gazetted level is
concerned, even DOPT guidelines doesn’t mandate it on account of the number of
regular posts meant for promotion too less.
3.
The extraordinarily acute stagnation being faced by the Central Excise
executive officers has also very well been admitted by the CBEC on various
occasions. These disparities can only be removed by bringing all Inspectors,
Preventive officers and Examiners of same year to same level of promotion
through the process of merging all of the three non-gazetted categories and
also gazetted categories into one at Group ‘B’ non-gazetted as well as Group
‘B’ gazetted level.
(7) TIMELY CONDUCTION OF DPC:
It is very unfortunate that
the Central Board of Excise and Customs does not implement the guidelines of
DOPT to grant promotions to the lower officers than group A. OM No. 22011/9/98-Estt. (D) dated
08.09.1998 of DOPT(Govt. of India), interalia
provides that the DPCs should
be convened at regular annual intervals to draw panels which could be utilized for
making promotions against the vacancies occurring during the course of a year. For this purpose, it
is essential for the concerned appointing authorities to initiate action to
fill-up the existing as well as anticipated vacancies well in advance of the
expiry of the previous panel by collecting relevant documents for placing
before the DPC. DPCs could be convened every year if necessary on a fixed date.
The Department should lay down a time schedule for holding DPCs under their
control and after laying down such a schedule the same should be monitored by
making one of their officers responsible for keeping a watch over the various
cadre authorities to ensure that they are held regularly. Holding of DPC
meetings need not be delayed or postponed on the ground that Recruitment Rules
for a post are being reviewed/amended. A vacancy shall be filled in accordance
with the Recruitment Rules in force on the date of vacancy. Very often, action
for holding DPC meeting is initiated after a vacancy has arisen. This results
in undue delay in the filling-up of the vacancy causing dissatisfaction among
those who are eligible for promotion. It may be ensured that regular meetings
of DPC are held every year for each category of posts so that an approved
select panel is available in advance for making promotions against vacancies
arising over a year. No proposal for holding of DPC should be sent to
UPSC until and unless all the
ACRs complete and up to date are
available. In certain cases involving collection of large number of ACRs, the
proposal can be sent only if at least 90% of the ACRs are available”. The Central Board of Excise
and Customs does not implement such OM to grant promotion to the grade of
Assistant Commissioner. On several occasions, DOPT has instructed that all
departments should take action to fill-up the posts in good time before
vacancies actually occur. It has also been
stipulated by DOPT that
responsibility for the delay should be assigned and those responsible should be
suitably dealt with, if there is any delay.
(8) REGULARISATION OF AD HOC PROMOTIONS
The Adhoc promotions to the post of Asstt.
Commissioner pending since 1997 have not yet been regularized by CBEC. The CBEC
is not having up to date dossiers of ACRs/APARs to grant promotions on time.
The CBEC does also not issue eligibility lists as per DOPT guidelines to grant
promotions. All of ad hoc promotions are required to be regularised immediately
as per the recruitment rules existing on the date of the regular DPC against
these ad hoc promotions.
(9) INTRODUCTION OF FLEXIBLE PROMOTION/COMPLEMENTING
SCHEME:
The problem of acute
stagnation existing in the cadre of Superintendent can be solved, if a flexible
promotional scheme is introduced for them after joining as Inspector. As
per the recommendations of IVth CPC, the flexible promotional scheme was
introduced in the Department of Science and Technology. The Vth CPC vide
chapter 54 of its report made a number of recommendations for modification of this
scheme. The DOPT vide Notification No. 2/41/97-Plc, dated 9.11.98 had made the
regulation of in situ promotion under such Flexible Promotional Scheme. It has been further reviewed by DOPT in the light of 6th CPC
recommendations and modified Flexible Complementing Scheme guidelines issued vide
OM No. AB/4017/37/2008-Esst(R) dated 10.09.10. FCS and MACPS both are also
applicable simultaneously.
2. Therefore, we request the study group to kindly be pleased to
recommend for introduction of a Flexible promotional/ complementing scheme on
completion of qualifying years of service as prescribed by DOPT under OM dated
24.03.2009
for granting of at least 5 in –situ promotions in the service career of each
and every Superintendent in
the hierarchy of functional promotions after joining as Inspector.
(10) BATCH TO BATCH NON FUNCTIONAL
FINANCIAL UPGRADATION TO THE CENTRAL EXCISE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AT PAR WITH THE
BEST PLACED COUNTERPARTS OF CSS ETC.
All
the organised group ‘A’ officers recruited with IAS, the best placed group ‘A’
service, in the same pay scale through common entry examination conducted by
UPSC have been granted financial parity with the counterparts of IAS. They have
been granted non-functional
financial up-gradation vide DOPT OM No. AB.14017/64/2008-Estt.(RR) dt. 24.04.09
to compensate the lack of promotions as compared to IAS.
2. As far as the group ‘B’ officers are concerned, the CSS
officers are the best placed group ‘B’ officers of Govt. of India like IAS in
group ‘A’. The group ‘B’ officers at the level of Inspector of Central Excise
and the Assistant of CSS are recruited in a common scale of pay through common entry examination conducted by SSC. The
officers recruited as Assistant (Group-B, Non Gazetted) in the Ministries get
the benefit of promotions upto the Joint Secretary level, i.e., i) SO with GP
of Rs. 5400/- in PB3 after 4 years of service, ii) US (Grade-I) with GP of
Rs.6600/-, iii) DS with GP of Rs. 7600/-, iv) Director with GP of Rs. 8700/- in
PB-4 and v) JS with GP of Rs. 10000/-. However, their counterpart Inspectors of
Central Excise in CBEC recruited as Group-B (Non Gazetted) through the same All
India competitive examination get only one promotion in 35/40 years of service
career.
3. The Assistants/Section Officers are working in the
headquarters offices on policy making seats whereas the
Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are working on more important
seats of revenue collection in the field formations. Despite of working on more
important seats, the Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are not
treated at par with the counterparts of CSS. These CSS counterparts are
retiring 4-5 grades above the officers recruited as the Inspector of Central
Excise. On account of this, the CSS counterparts are getting 60% more pay than
the officers recruited as Inspector of Central Excise. Even the pension of CSS
counterparts is more than the salary of the officers recruited as Inspector of
Central Excise.
4. The Inspectors of Central Excise are recruited in PB2 and
also retire on a PB2 post of Superintendent barring around 1% while all of
their common entry counterparts of CSS easily reach PB4 levels after being
recruited with them in PB2 through the same examination with same eligible
conditions. It is also worth to submit that the revenue officers are highly
placed throughout the world in the matter of salary, perks and career prospects
as compared to other employees but, very unfortunately, our officers are facing
the worst prospects in each & every matter.
5. The group ‘A’ officers in the Ministries are selected
under Central Staffing Scheme on deputation basis from organized Group ‘A’
Services or from CSS officers being promoted from the post of Assistant/Section
Officer but no such opportunity is available for the Inspectors/Superintendents
of Central Excise who are not only looking after the work relating to
collection of Central Excise duty but also
looking after the work of collection of
Customs duty (including Inland Air Travel Tax and Foreign Travel (Tax) and
Service Tax. Needless to submit that they are already earning the major portion
of the govt. revenues. It is also worth to submit that the Govt. of India has
regularly been earning the revenue far ahead of the revenue targets in r/o of
Central Excise duty, Customs duty and Service Tax particularly due to the
efficient, committed & effective efforts of the workforce in the form of
Central Excise Inspectors/Superintendents despite of their total
demoralisation, disappointment and job-dissatisfaction in r/o pay & perks,
career prospects and working conditions.
6.
Above facts very well manifest the injustice meted out to officers recruited as
Central Excise Inspector despite of the most important work of revenue
collection being done by them for govt. During this course, they have been
facing every threat including life of them as well as their families by the
hard core criminals, smugglers and white collared criminals alongwith
tremendous administrative pressures. Thus, the officers recruited as the Inspector
of Central Excise deserve a far better treatment in every aspect including pay,
perks and career prospects. The grant of the non-functional financial upgradation
on batch to batch basis with the common entry counterparts of CSS on the lines
of granting the non-functional financial upgradation to all Group ‘A’ officers
at par with IAS may really be a solace for these hard working Central Excise
officers.
7. The Central Excise Superintendents have been facing
continuous acute stagnation for decades. Out of more than 11500
Central Excise Superintendents, around 10000 are already eligible for promotion
to group ‘A’ having rendered more qualifying service than required for
promotion.
8. As far as the importance of the responsibilities is
concerned, the Superintendents are discharging all functions relating to
assessment, investigation & intelligence, issuance of Show Cause Notices
with the powers of adjudication. They have not only been conferred with the
judicial powers in the matter of adjudication but also been conferred with the
judicial powers of recording statements of various persons in terms of Section
14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 108 of the Customs Act,
1962. The statements tendered before the Central Excise Superintendent
have a legal binding and are treated as a valid piece of evidence by various
courts including the Hon’ble Supreme Court just like the statements tendered
before a Magistrate. No such powers have been conferred to the CSS officers or
any other counterparts of Central Excise Superintendents/Inspectors. It is also
important to mention that the judicial officers are not only already being
highly paid with extra perks but also treated in a far better way in the matter
of career prospects than our Superintendents in our country.
9. Though the Central Excise Superintendents are performing
more responsible work functions as compared to other common entry counterparts,
yet they are facing the worst career prospects instead of being given better
treatment. This injustice is being faced by them despite of being the ‘backbone
of the government revenue’ on account of being the major revenue collectors for
the government in the form of Central Excise duty, Customs duty and Service Tax
and also GST in the forthcoming times. In the actual terms, they are the
‘backbone of the government’ on account of being responsible to earn the
finance for the government. But very unfortunately, they are being totally
ignored in every matter.
10. The parity is the basic concept of our Constitution and
the parity in promotions is required to be maintained amongst the similarly
placed employees but the Government of India have not initiated any action to
maintain parity in promotions as well as pay packages amongst the Group ‘B’
Gazetted and Non-Gazetted officers. The group ‘A’ officers have already been
granted financial parity by the Government of India by the grant of
non-functional financial upgradation to other group ‘A’ officers at par with
the counterparts of IAS. The grant
of the batch to batch non-functional financial upgradation after entry into
group ‘B’ or equivalent grade is also the immediate need of the time for all
group ‘B’ officers to bring them at par at least financially with the best
placed group ‘B’ counterparts like CSS etc. The Inspectors
and Superintendents of Central Excise are being discriminated despite of
collecting the major portion of Government revenues and are not being awarded
due career prospects as well as appropriate pay packages.
11.
In view of above, it is requested that the study group may be pleased to
recommend that the officers recruited as Inspector/Superintendent of Central
Excise be granted at least non-functional financial upgradation at par with
their counterparts of CSS on batch to batch basis since their initial joining
in group B or equivalent grade enabling them to retire in PB4 like their
counterparts too. The claim of the Central Excise
Superintendents becomes even stronger than other Group B counterparts on
account of the judicial powers granted to them to adjudicate the relevant cases
and recording statements like a Magistrate under Section 14 of Central Excise
Act and Section 108 of Customs Act having validity even before the Supreme
Court. Not only it, the Adjudication Orders are also being prepared by them for
the Commissioner level officers.
(11) PROMOTING ALL THE
SUPERINTENDENTS WHO HAVE COMPLETED 1½ TIMES OF QUALIFYING SERVICE ON THE LINES
OF CSS:
During
the year 1999, all Section Officers completing 1½ times of qualifying service were promoted on ‘in-situ basis’ to
the senior group ‘A’ post of Under Secretary for removal of their stagnation.
Keeping in view the extraordinarily acute stagnation of the Central Excise Superintendents,
all Superintendents completing 1½
times of qualifying service may also kindly be promoted either on regular basis
or in-situ basis. It is worth to submit that all of such officers are already
drawing the salary of the higher post/s on account of time scale or ACP/MACP
upgradation. It will, thus, require no expenditure. No posts/vacancies will
also be required for in-situ promotions. Therefore it is requested that the
study group may be pleased to recommend to allow promotions to all the Superintendents who have already
completed 1½ times of qualifying service on the lines of CSS.
(12) ENHANCEMENT OF
PERCENTAGE OF PROMOTION QUOTA FROM 50% TO AT LEAST 90% IN GROUP ‘A’ RECRUITMENT
RULES:
It is also requested that the study group may be
pleased to recommend for enhancement of percentage of promotion quota from 50%
to at least 90% in Group A Recruitment Rules by making the direct recruit quota
maximum to 10%.
It will not only give the opportunity to promotee officers to reach the higher
levels but the stature of direct Group A service will also be protected.
(13)
UNIFORM PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY:
The
Central Excise Superintendents are promoted merely to a JTS Group ‘A’ post
whereas many other Group ‘B’ Gazetted officers are being promoted to a STS
Group ‘A’ post in the Central as well as State Governments. Promotional
hierarchy is also varying department to department. Somewhere Group ‘B’
Gazetted Officers are promoted merely to a post carrying a Grade Pay of Rs.
5400/- in PB3 whereas they are being promoted to a post carrying a Grade Pay of
Rs. 6600/- at other places. Like it, somewhere Group ‘B’ Non-Gazetted Officers
are promoted to a post carrying a Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- in PB3 whereas they
are being promoted to a post carrying a Grade Pay of Rs. 4800/- or Rs. 4600/-
at other places. Somewhere promotional hierarchy is 4600Ã 6600Ã 8700
(CPWD etc.), somewhere 4600Ã 4800Ã 6600Ã 7600Ã 8700 (CBEC etc.) and somewhere it is 4600Ã 4800Ã 5400Ã 6600Ã 7600Ã 8700
(CSS etc.).
So,
the promotional hierarchy after entry into group ‘B’ is required to be made
uniform for the sake of justice to all. The posts under the grade pays of Rs.
5400/- & 6600/- and also Rs. 7600/- & 8700/- being functionally same,
the ideal promotional hierarchy for all after entry into Group ‘B’ seems only
to be 4600Ã 6600Ã 8700Ã 10000.
It is, therefore, requested to make the promotional hierarchy uniform for all
Group ‘B’ officers as 4600Ã 6600Ã 8700Ã 10000 on the pattern of CPWD. Where the Group ‘B’
gazetted officers are placed in a grade pay higher than Rs. 4600/-, they all
may kindly be promoted uniformly to a post carrying a grade pay of Rs. 6600/-.
Thus, the promotional hierarchy should kindly be as below-
“Group
‘B’ Gazetted postà 6600à 8700à 10000”.
(14) TIMELY
CADRE RESTRUCTURINGS:
The Cadre Restructuring exercises have not been
conducted at prescribed intervals of every five years. Only two cadre
restructurings have happened in the history of the CBEC, the implementation of
one of which is still pending despite of its process being started in 2006.
Prior to it, the cadre restructuring was happened in 2001 without taking any
measures for Central Excise Superintendents. The interest of the Group ‘A’
officers was only watched every time paying no heed to the extraordinarily
acute stagnation of the Central Excise Superintendents who are forced to retire
with single promotion in the career of 35-40 years as well as working under the
extreme juniors of the Customs stream.
2. It is, therefore, requested not only to recommend
for timely cadre restructurings in CBEC but also to grant the compensation for
the unhappened cadre restructurings to the Central Excise Superintendents
alongwith conducting specific cadre review individually for the category of
Central Excise Superintendents for taking the measures for their entry into PB4
levels like their counterparts particularly keeping the extraordinarily acute
stagnation being faced by them.
(15) AT LEAST FIVE
FUNCTIONAL PROMOTIONS:
Inspectors
and Superintendents of Central Excise have been suffering with extraordinarily
acute stagnation for decades. There are many who didn't get any promotion for
more than 25 years and they are retiring with single promotion on a PB2 post in
the career of 35-40 years whereas their common entry counterparts are easily
entering into PB4 with 5-6 promotions after entry into PB2 post. It is also
worth to mention that the Central Excise Superintendents & Inspectors are
forced to work under their extreme juniors of Customs belonging to one &
the same cadre of Inspector and recruited through one & the same process
under one & the same organization of CBEC in one & the same department
of Revenue of one & the same Ministry of Finance with one & same
administrative hierarchy. This discrimination is required to be undone
immediately.
2. There
should kindly be the provisions to allow minimum actual 5 promotions on
functional basis to Group ‘B’ Gazetted officers of CBEC after entry into group
‘B’ or equivalent grade/post like the Group ‘A’ officers in time bound
manner or on completion of standard residency periods prescribed by the DOPT.
No need to submit that the residency periods have been prescribed by the DOPT
with due diligence and application of mind. The officers should get at least
the relevant Grade Pay/pay scale, if not the actual promotions, during the
prescribed period The Time bound promotion scheme should be introduced in all
departments for Group ‘B’ officers particularly including Central Excise Superintendents
and Inspectors. If 5 functional promotions are not possible, there should be
the provisions of at least 5 in situ promotions in the functional
promotion hierarchy in a time bound manner.
(16) TIME SCALE AFTER EVERY 7 YEARS:
The grant of time scale after every
7 years was also recommended to the 6th CPC by the CBEC as one of
the measures to remove the stagnation of Group ‘B’ executive officers. It is
requested to bring such a scheme for Central Excise Superintendents as one of
the measures to compensate them at least financial loss after joining as
Inspector or equivalent grade as one of the measures.
(17) CREATION OF LEAVE RESERVE POSTS:
No leave reserve post has been
created at Group ‘A’ entry level in the ensuing cadre restructuring of CBEC.
The required number of leave reserve posts may, therefore, kindly be created
accordingly as per the rules.
(18) REMOVAL OF REGIONAL DISPARITIES:
On account of being recruited under
various Cadre Controlling Authorities, there exist disparities in promotions
from the post of Inspector to Superintendent ranging from 12 to 24 years. As a
result, there is also a difference in time gap to become Asstt. Commissioner
after joining as Inspector. However, these regional disparities keep
fluctuating based on various factors. As a result, some officers have reached
the level of Addl. Commissioner due to early promotion in the past at some
places but, now, they are lagging behind and waiting to be promoted as
Superintendent at the same places. Likewise, the officers are able to get early
promotion to the post of Superintendent at the places where they were lagging
behind the others in the past. These disparities are shown in the following
table-
[Batch (Year of joining) of Inspector promoted to Assistant
Commissioner]
Seniority Zone
|
ALLAHABAD
|
PATNA
|
MUMBAI
|
BANGALORE
|
KOCHI
|
DELHI
|
CHANDIGARH
|
CHENNAI
|
JAIPUR
|
INDORE
|
HYDERABAD
|
KOLKATA
|
SHILLONG
|
BHUBANESWAR
|
VADODARA
|
Joining Year
|
1975
|
1975
|
1977
|
1975
|
1975
|
1976
|
1977
|
1975
|
1980
|
1975
|
1977
|
1974
|
1978
|
1975
|
1975
|
Promotion to Supdt. Of CE
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
1993
|
Promotion to Asst. Commr.
|
2014
|
2013
|
2013
|
2013
|
2014
|
2014
|
2014
|
2014
|
2014
|
2013
|
2013
|
2013
|
2014
|
2013
|
2013
|
These
disparities require to be removed and the only way to remove the same seems to
grant the affected officers parity with other officers as already submitted
above. It is worth to mention that the grant of parity with the
inter-departmental (CSS etc.)/intra-departmental (CBDT)/intra-organisational
(Examiners) counterparts is the best way to remove these disparities. Such
parity will automatically remove all of the disparities.
(RAVI
MALIK),
Secretary
General.