Sub:- Grant of financial up-gradation under MACP Scheme on promotional hierarchy (instead of Grade Pay hierarchy) – as per judgment of various Courts.
Ref: 1. DOP OM No.35034/3/2008-Estt. (D), dated 19th May, 2009, Reg: Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme [MACPS]
2. OA No.1038/CH/2010, dated 31.5.2011 – Rajpal Vs UOI. – Referred in para 4 & 5 of CAT Delhi OA No.904/2012, dated 26.11.2012
3. CWP No.19387/2011, dated 19.10.2011 – Rajpal Vs Union of India – in High Court of Punjab & Haryana upholding OA No.1038/CH/2010-Referred in para 6 of CAT Delhi OA No.904/2012, dated 26.11.2012
4. OA No.904/2012, dated 26.11.2012 – Sanjay Kuamr and 18 others Versus Union of India – in CAT Delhi, (Copy attached).
i. The said orders for granting the financial up-gradation under MACPS on Grade Pay hierarchy instead of promotional hierarchy is totally unjust and ultra-vires.
ii. Many courts have held that Financial Upgrading under MACPS should be granted in the promotional grade pay or promotional hierarchy, as per details submitted here below:
Petition No. | Applicants & respondents | Court | Judgment |
OA No.1038/CH/2010dated 31 .5.2011 | Rai Pal Versus Union of India | CAT Chandigarh | Hon. CAT Chandigarh allowed the OA No.1038/CH/2010 for grant of financial up-gradation under MA CPS in the promotional hierarchy |
CWP No.19387/2011, dated 19.10.2011 | Raj Pal Versus Union of India | High Court of Punjab & Haryana | Hon. High Court of Punjab Haryana upheld that there was no infirmity in the order passed by CAT Chandigarh oA No.1038/CH/2010. |
SLA / TA CC 7467/2013 | Union of India Versus Raj Pal | Supreme Court of India | Hon. Supreme Court Dismissed the Application for Condonation of Delay |
OA No.904/2012 dated 26.11.2012 | Sanjay Kumar and 18 others Versus Union of India | CAT Delhi | Hon. CAT Delhi, allowed the OA, that respondents should give the next higher grade Pay & Pay bandattached to the next promotional post in the hierarchy |