" IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF AIACEGEO. THIS IS THE ONLY ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERINTENDENTS OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE THROUGH OUT THE COUNTRY . President Mr.T.Dass and SG Mr. Harpal Singh.

Sunday 9 April 2017

Written submissions to Chairperson

ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:                                          Address for communication:                                       Secretary General:
R. Chandramouli                240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.)                                              Ravi Malik
Mob. 08939955463   mail Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com, Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in Mob. 09868816290
Vice Presidents: P. Parwani, L. L. Singhvi (Central); AnuragChaudhary, Ravi Joshi (North); N. Raman, G. Srinath (South); B. K. Sinha, AshwiniMajhi (East); Rajesh Chaher, J. D. Patil (West) Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, J. S. Aiyer (Central); R. K. Solanki, AshishVajpeyi (North); M. Nagaraju, Ajithkumar P. C. (South); P. K. Sen, S. Bhattachariya (East); JasramMeena, M. K. Mishra (West) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma
Treasurer: N. R. MandaLiaison Secretary: A. S. KunduCoordinator on Telangana: P. Shravan Kumar
(Recognised by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 80/AIB/G/17                                                                          Dt. 06.04.17
To,
Ms. Vanaja N. Sarna,
Chairperson, CBEC,
North Block, New Delhi.
Sub: Request for redressal of grievances under employee grievance redressal mechanism.
Madam,
            The following points are submitted with due regards for your kind consideration and due redressal-
            (A) DPC for the year 2016-17 and 2017-18 for the post of Asstt. Commissioner in CBEC: DPC for a financial year should be conducted well in advance latest by the month of January of the preceding year as per the DOPT OMs No. 22011/1/2011-Estt.(D) Dt. 23.04.15, 22011/9/98-Estt (D) Dt. 08.09.98, 22011/1/2011-Estt (D) Dt. 11.03.11, 22011/1/2011-Estt (D) Dt. 13.12.13, 22011/1/2011-Esstt(D) Dt. 27.10.16 etc. Accordingly, the DPC for the year 2016-17 and 2017-18 should have been convened in the month of January, 2016 and January, 2017 respectively. Chain vacancies on account of cascading effect from higher side are also required to be included for the promotion to the post of Asstt. Commissioner as per the DOPT OM No. 22011/9/98-Estt(D) Dt. 06.10.99. It is clearly mentioned in this OM that the existing and clear anticipated vacancies as well as chain vacancies on account of retirements, promotions, VRS, demise etc. in all higher grades/hierarchy should be included for the purpose of DPC. It is requested to convene DPC against all unfilled/existing/anticipated  posts of Asstt. Commissioner including promotion quota against regular/permanent posts, retirements, VRS, demise, backlog vacancies etc. as our officers are forced to retire waiting for the rarest IInd promotion.
            (B) Initial pay scale to Central Excise Superintendent at par with DSP of CBI alongwith other perks & allowances etc.: Central Excise Superintendents are considered analogous to the post of DSP in CBI. They are also eligible to be appointed to the post of DSP in CBI on ‘transfer on deputation’ basis. Till 07.02.96, the pay scale of both posts was same, i.e., Rs. 2000-3500/-. However, the Govt vide OM No. 245/23/95 – AVD-II Dt. 08.02.96 of DOPT enhanced the pay scale of DSP of CBI to Rs. 2200-4000/- retrospectively w.e.f. 01.01.86 without any increase in their responsibilities and also without recommendations of CPC. Whereas new higher responsibilities of judicial nature were conferred upon Central Excise Superintendents vide Circular No.  922/12/ 2010-CX issued vide F. No. 208/2/2009-CX-6 Dt. 18.05.10 and 130/12/2010–ST issued vide F. No. 137/68/2010-CX. 4 Dt. 20.05.10. Their responsibilities have again been increased 10 times by enhancing the adjudication limit to Rs. 10 lac vide circular No. 1049/37/2016-CX issued vide F. No. 267/40/2016-CX.8 Dt. 29.09.16 of CBEC. No need to say that increased/higher responsibilities are always directly linked with the increased/higher pay scales. But very unfortunately, the pay scale of Central Excise Superintendent has not been increased despite of regular increase in their responsibilities. They have also been conferred with new higher technical/scientific responsibilities of ACES since 2010. The claim of Superintendents becomes even stronger on account of recording statements like a Magistrate under Section 14 of Central Excise Act & Section 108 of Customs Act having validity even before Supreme Court. Not only it, Adjudication Orders are also being prepared by them for Commissioner level officers.  No such responsibilities have been conferred upon any counterpart of them including CBI. They are also being conferred with the new additional responsibilities every year in the Finance Bill (Budget). They are again going to bear new & very important responsibilities under GST. Despite of the admission by Expenditure Department Under RTI vide OM No. 1148/Dir(A)/2008 Dt. 08.12.08 that the pay scale of Central Excise Superintendent was enhanced on 21.04.04 to grant them parity with DSP of CBI/DCIO of IB, Central Excise Superintendent was not given the said parity and was granted merely a lower pay scale of Rs. 7500-12000/- instead of Rs. 8000-13500/- or equivalent. It is requested to place Central Excise Superintendent at least under a grade pay of Rs. 5400/- in PB3 (Level-10) or equivalent scale alongwith other perks & allowances etc. w.e.f. the date of grant of the same to the DSP of CBI.           
(C) Batch to batch Non Functional Financial Upgradation to our officers to grant financial parity with the best placed counterparts of CSS etc. on the lines of other Group ‘A’ cadres vs. IAS: All organised group ‘A’ officers recruited with IAS in the same pay scale through common entry have been granted non-functional financial up-gradation (NFU) vide DOPT OM No. AB.14017/64/2008-Estt.(RR) Dt. 24.04.09 to compensate lack of promotions as compared to IAS. CBEC sent a proposal to the 7th CPC, as approved by the CBEC (and as advised by the Department of Expenditure)  for grant of non-functional financial upgradation granting batch to batch financial parity to Group ‘B’ Executive officers with the analogous posts in Central Secretariat, vis. Assistant. However, CPC does not appear to have examined this proposal. As far as the group ‘B’ officers are concerned, the CSS officers are the best placed group ‘B’ officers of Govt. of India. The group ‘B’ officers at the level of Inspector of Central Excise and the Assistant of CSS are recruited in a common scale of pay through common entry examination conducted by SSC. The officers recruited as Assistant (Group-B, Non Gazetted) in the Ministries get the benefit of promotions upto the Joint Secretary level, i.e., i) SO with GP of Rs. 4800 and with GP of Rs. 5400/- in PB3 after 4 years of service, ii) US (Grade-I) with GP of Rs.6600/-, iii) DS with GP of Rs. 7600/-, iv) Director with GP of Rs. 8700/- in PB-4 and v) JS with GP of Rs. 10000/-. However, the most of their counterpart Inspectors of Central Excise in CBEC recruited as Group-B (Non Gazetted) through the same All India competitive examination get only one promotion in 35/40 years of service career. It is requested that the Central Excise Superintendents/Inspectors may also kindly be granted non-functional financial up-gradation to grant them at least financial parity with their best placed common entry counterparts of CSS etc. after entry into Group ‘B’ or equivalent grade on batch to batch basis enabling them to retire in PB4 like their counterparts.
            (D) Scheme to improve the career prospects of Central Excise Superintendents as our officers are retiring with single promotion in the service career of 35-40 years: The Cabinet/CRC/Cabinet Secretary recommended to take extra measures to remove stagnation of group ‘B’ Central Excise executive officers independent of cadre restructuring. But very unfortunately, no measures have been taken till date to remove the stagnation of group ‘B’ executive officers in CBEC despite of the recommendations of Cabinet/CRC/Cabinet Secretary. A scheme is, therefore, required to be formulated enabling Central Excise Superintendents and Inspectors also entered into PB4 levels (at least a Grade Pay of Rs. 8700/-) like the common entry counterparts of CBDT, CSS, Customs etc. as our officers are getting salary even less than the pension of the counterparts. This can be done by introduction of flexible/dynamic promotion/complementing scheme. This scheme was introduced for the Scientists in the Department of Science & Technology to remove their stagnation. Benefit of such scheme has also been given to Doctors. Central Excise Superintendents are retiring with single promotion on a PB2 post in a career of 35-40 years whereas their common entry counterparts of Customs, CBDT, CSS etc. are easily entering into PB4 levels with 5-6 promotions. Central Excise Superintendents are also forced to work under their extreme juniors of Customs (Examiners) belonging to one & same cadre of Inspector and recruited through one & same process under one & same organization of CBEC in one & same department of Revenue of one & same Ministry of Finance with one & same administrative hierarchy. Examiner of 1984 has already become Addl. Commissioner (GP-Rs. 8700/- in PB4, Level-13) after getting 5 promotions whereas the Central Excise Inspector of 1984 is yet to get IInd promotion to JTS post of Asstt. Commissioner (GP-Rs. 5400/- in PB3, Level-10). In view of the above particularly keeping in view their extraordinarily acute stagnation, it is requested that the Central Excise Superintendents may kindly be granted (a) At least 5 in-situ promotions in the hierarchy of functional promotions under flexible/dynamic promotion/complementing scheme or (b) In-situ promotions/non-functional upgradation on completion of residency periods as prescribed by DOPT under OM No. AB.14017/61/2008-Estt. (RR) Dt. 24.03.09 after joining as Inspector.
            (E) Undoing of MACP irregularities (para 8.1, upgradation in promotional hierarchy and offsetting of MACP upgradation with time scale) as our officers were able to get the grade pay of Rs. 5400/- in PB3 after 24 years of service under ACPS while now getting the same after 30 years of service under MACPS: The MACP Scheme envisages placement merely in the immediate next Grade Pay instead of promotional hierarchy. One MACP upgradation has also been offset with the non-functional time scale granted to Group B gazetted officers after completion of 4 years of service. Further, single grade pay of Rs. 5400/- was also bifurcated into two, i.e., Rs. 5400/- in PB2 and PB3 without the difference of a single rupee under para 8.1 of MACPS. Pay commission didn’t make any recommendation to offset the MACP upgradation with time scale. The procedure to grant time scale and MACP upgradation is also totally different. Promotional hierarchy is also varying department to department which is required to be made uniform. Somewhere Group ‘B’ Gazetted officers are promoted merely to a post at Level-10 (CBEC etc.) whereas they are being promoted to a post at Level-11 (CSS, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, MEA, DANICS, DANIPS, CSSS, AFHQ, Railway Board, Foreign Services, Administrative services, Forest services, Police services, DANICS, DANIPS, State services etc.) at other places. Like it, somewhere Group ‘B’ Non-Gazetted Officers are promoted to a post at Level-10 (CBI, IB, Hindi wing of CBEC etc.) whereas they are being promoted to a post at Level-8 (CBEC etc.) or Level-7 (CPWD etc.) at other places. Somewhere Group ‘B’ Gazetted Officers are placed in Level-7 (CPWD etc.) whereas Level-8 (CBEC etc.) and also Level-9 (Postal department, Audit & Accounts services etc.) at other places. Somewhere promotional hierarchy is Level-7àLevel-11àLevel-13, somewhere Level-7àLevel-8àLevel-11àLevel-12àLevel-13, somewhere Level-7àLevel-9àLevel-10àLevel-11àLevel-12àLevel-13 and somewhere it is Level-7àLevel-8àLevel-10àLevel-11àLevel-12àLevel-13. Some Group ‘B’ Gazetted Officers have been granted the time scale in PB2 and others in PB3. Due to varying promotional hierarchies, some officers got a Grade Pay of Rs. 7600/- and some Rs. 6600/- on IIIrd MACP upgradation. The worst hit category is the Central Excise Superintendents who are now able to get only a grade pay of Rs. 5400/- after 30 years or more service which they were able to get only after 24 years of service under ACPS. Thus, the MACPS is totally unable to fulfill the basic purpose of grant of the financial upgradations to counter stagnation due to the lack of promotional avenues. The source of MACPS being one and the same, i.e., common recommendations of the 6th CPC, it is also worth to mention that the State governments like Uttar Pradesh etc. have not offset the MACP upgradation with the time scale. There also exist no same Grade Pays like para 8.1 of MACPS in the Central Government. They have also granted the IIIrd MACP upgradation within 26 or less years to their employees without bifurcating the single grade pay at any level. As a result, their officers are able to get 4 financial upgradations (3 financial upgradations+1 time scale) as a combined effect of time scale and MACP Scheme. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India vide SLP No. 7467/2013 filed by the Government against the judgement of the Hon’ble High Court of Chandigarh in CWP No. 19387/2011 has already confirmed the order dated 31.05.2011 of Chandigarh CAT for grant of financial upgradation in the promotional hierarchy under MACPS. Thus, para 8.1 is not in consonance to the verdict given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and is liable to be scrapped w.e.f. its initiation. The offset of the MACP upgradation is also liable to be scrapped w.e.f. its initiation as per the verdict given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Nurses Union (Regd.) Vs. U.O.I. and also by the Hon’ble CAT of Ernakulam in the case of Sh. N. K. Gopinatham Vs.  UOI.  So, it is requested to grant MACP upgradations based on functional hierarchy without offsetting with the time scale with the provisions for stepping-up of the pay of seniors at par with the juniors in conformity with the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in Ashok Kumar case and also without bifurcating any grade pay.
            (F) Verdict given in OA No. 2323/2012 by Principal Bench of Hon’ble CAT: Kindly refer to the verdict given in the OA No. 2323/2012. Association filed the said OA seeking amendments/revision of the Recruitment Rules to bring all the Inspectors (i.e. Inspectors of Central Excise, Preventive Officers and Examiners of Customs) recruited in a particular year through All India Combined Examination in parity to maintain the principle of equal opportunity & equality before law and to save the senior Central Excise officers from humiliation of working under their juniors of Customs belonging to the same cadre of Inspector in CBEC. Accordingly the Govt. undertook before the Hon’ble CAT that the amendment of the Recruitment Rules to the said effect is already under process. Hon’ble CAT has directed to expedite the process of amendment of the Recruitment Rules by taking effective steps for Notification within a reasonable period, preferably within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Accordingly, it is requested to finalise the Recruitment Rules at an early date to bring all the Inspectors (i.e., Inspectors of Central Excise, Preventive Officers and Examiners of Customs) recruited in a particular year through All India Combined Examination at par in the matter of promotions to save the senior Central Excise officers from humiliation of working under their juniors of Customs.
                              Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
                                                                                                                                                           


 (RAVI MALIK),

Secretary General.