Dear Friends,
again namaste.
I am getting regular queries about the implementation of the Subramanium case. Friends, the matter was referred to the Expenditure on pursuance by the Association. The Expenditure was of the view that the opinion of the DOPT as well as Law Ministry may also be taken in the matter exploring the possibility of filing of review petition in the Supreme Court. DOPT also gave same opinion in addition to implement it in person and now, the matter is pending with the Ministry of Law. Let us see what opinion comes from the Ministry of Law, whether they say to implement it in general or say to implement it in person or say to go for review. It is, however, pertinent to mention that we had already filed a petition in the CAT to implement it in general. The govt. gave an affidavit in the CAT that it can't be implemented in general because of being pending in the Supreme Court. Now, the govt. has no reason/pretext not to implement it in general as it has already been finalised in the Supreme Court. No need to say that the verdict given by the Apex Court is always said to be the law of land. Thus, govt. will invite the contempt if they don't implement it now in general in consonance of their affidavit filed in the CAT. If required, we shall file the contempt petition under consultation of the advocate if the govt. doesn't implement it in general.
Loving regards,
RAVI MALIK,
Secretary General,
AIACEGEO.
again namaste.
I am getting regular queries about the implementation of the Subramanium case. Friends, the matter was referred to the Expenditure on pursuance by the Association. The Expenditure was of the view that the opinion of the DOPT as well as Law Ministry may also be taken in the matter exploring the possibility of filing of review petition in the Supreme Court. DOPT also gave same opinion in addition to implement it in person and now, the matter is pending with the Ministry of Law. Let us see what opinion comes from the Ministry of Law, whether they say to implement it in general or say to implement it in person or say to go for review. It is, however, pertinent to mention that we had already filed a petition in the CAT to implement it in general. The govt. gave an affidavit in the CAT that it can't be implemented in general because of being pending in the Supreme Court. Now, the govt. has no reason/pretext not to implement it in general as it has already been finalised in the Supreme Court. No need to say that the verdict given by the Apex Court is always said to be the law of land. Thus, govt. will invite the contempt if they don't implement it now in general in consonance of their affidavit filed in the CAT. If required, we shall file the contempt petition under consultation of the advocate if the govt. doesn't implement it in general.
Loving regards,
RAVI MALIK,
Secretary General,
AIACEGEO.
