" IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF AIACEGEO. THIS IS THE ONLY ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERINTENDENTS OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE THROUGH OUT THE COUNTRY . President Mr.T.Dass and SG Mr. Harpal Singh.

Friday, 11 September 2020

Scrutiny of GST returns

 

ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE

GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Patron                                                                   Chief Patron                                                               Patron

A. Venkatesh                                                           Ravi Malik                                                        C. S. Sharma

Mob. 7780255361                                             Mob. 9868816290                                          Mob. 9313885411

President:                                           Address for communication:                                  Secretary General:

T. Dass                                Flat No. 6, SE 11, Shastri Nagar, Ghaziabad                                   Harpal Singh

Mob.9848088928     mail Id:aiacegeo2019@gmail.com    Site:cengoindia.blogspot.in        Mob.9717510598

Vice Presidents: B L Meena, K V Sriniwas  (Central) Chinmoy Ghosh, Rajashish Dutta (East) Ashish Vajpayee, Amadul Islam (North) B Pavan K Reddy, M Jegannathan (South) Sanjeev Sahai, U D Meena (West) Joint Secretaries: S P Pandey, T A Manojuman (Central) Apurba Roy, Siddharth Tewari (East) A K Meena, S K Shrimali (West) Anand Narayan, Prabhakar Sharma (North) H Sadanand, M Nagaraju (South); All India Coordinator: B L Meena Office Secretary: B C Gupta Treasuer: Manoj Kumar Organising Secretary: Soumen Bhattachariya Liaisoning Secretary: Bhoopendra Singh

(Recognised by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)

Office address: 206, B wing, CGO Complex II, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad

Ref. No. 151/AIB/U/20                                                                                               Dt. 11.09.20

To,

Sh. M. Ajit Kumar,

Chairman, CBIC,

North Block, New Delhi.

Sub: Scrutiny of GST returns by not following AIO module/task list.

Sir,

            Your kind attention is invited to the letter dated 09.09.20 (copy enclosed) of the worthy Commissioner of CGST, Gandhinagar namely Dr. Jeetesh Nagori with the subject of “Pathetic work on scrutiny of GST return”. The language of the letter seems totally highhanded, unofficial, undemocratic, insulting and threatening using the wordings like, “Now it’s time to fix all such useless elements”, “Let me clear that I am not in mood to spare any non performer and they should be ready for tough calls”, “should also ready for music”, “I hope the tone and tenor of my letter is quite clear” etc.

            2. It is to submit with due regards that such letters only spoil the work culture and working atmosphere instead of resulting into any productivity. The Superintendents have been directed to do preliminary scrutiny of minimum 100 returns and detailed scrutiny of minimum 25 returns in a month by the said letter. This is total injustice to already extraordinarily overburdened Superintendents and may result into the total collapse of the system by creation of an atmosphere of total panic, mistrust, threat and suppression as an outcome of the tone and tenor of the letter of Dr. Jeetesh Nagori. It is also reiterated that the CBIC has not issued any SOP for scrutiny of GST returns in the fashion as ordered by Dr. Jeetesh Nagori. Throughout the country, the officers are very much agitated by the letter of Dr. Nagori.

3. It is further to submit that no important work in relation of revenue has been allotted to the Commissioners and above officers under GST. They are working merely as administrative heads. But it is no way justified to issue such threatening letters by a HOD in the name of administrative work. They have work of review of orders, only which can be termed as revenue related. That too is being analysed and processed by the Superintendent. The appeal too is drafted by the Superintendent. As also requested by the Association under the submissions made about the cadre restructuring, time now has come to define the revenue related responsibilities for each level including Commissioner and above. No need to submit that this should be done based on the principle “higher post, higher responsibility for scrutiny/assessment in direct proportion of pay package” on the pattern of State GST and sister organization of Income Tax. Otherwise all higher level posts are required to be abolished and create more posts at lower levels which are actually needed for revenue augmentation in consonance of GST Act. There seems no need to have decorative posts in the National interest, e.g., huge number of Commissioners and above. Actually, today Commissioner and above posts have no real work in GST and their work seems to be totally unproductive. It is the need of the time that the assessees should be allocated on the basis of the turnover upto all higher/highest levels for scrutiny/assessment as all are revenue officers and all should be given responsibility of actual revenue related work. The revenue officers are not supposed to do merely supervisory/monitoring work whether belonged to Superintendent level or Commissioner or above levels. We all are citizens of our great India and all should bear responsibility in Nation building duly maintaining mutual respect.

4. The tone and tenor of the letter of Dr. Nagori is as the Superintendents are doing no work whereas the reality is that the Superintendents are the backbone of the CBIC and already doing the work even above their capacity by working for twenty four hours and even on holidays and also in odd hours despite of getting the worst pay packages and worst career prospects in comparison to their counterparts. All responsibilities and burden of work have been deviated to them. If all works are to be done by the Superintendents only, there seems no need of highly paid higher posts in the CBIC. If the higher authorities are meant only for administrative work, IAS officers seems the better option as being done in states who are only a few at the level of Commissioner in comparison to the huge numbers and doing non-revenue works in our CBIC.

5. Moreover, it is a bitter fact that the Superintendent level officers are being asked to work without due manpower and infrastructure but they are being made responsible for everything. If all levels of the officers are allotted specific job of return scrutiny and assessment in direct proportion to pay packages, it shall increase the efficiency and productivity and also the hefty pay packages to higher authorities shall be justified. This will optimize the work at every level to improve the output and everybody will be responsive. If an example of scrutiny of returns is taken, it should be allotted to all levels from Superintendent to Commissioner and above based on value/tax/turnover. Similar pattern should be adopted for other works. This will also help to maintain ratio between different cadres for effective supervision. It is also reiterated that the states are handling more assessees than us with one Commissioner. So, work distribution in direct proportion of pay packages is the urgent need of time.

6. It is worth to mention that our Superintendents are already doing so many offline work functions relating to development and verification of intelligence, transit checks, surprise checks, keeping eye to discourage evasion, carry out preventive and enforcement activities, recovery of arrears, trade facilitation etc. The detailed responsibilities born by our Superintendents have already been submitted vide letter Ref. No. Ref. No. 310/AIB/R/18 Dt. 26.11.18 (copy enclosed). No need to say that our Superintendents are already working hard with all their energy and zeal to contribute for the Nation and maximization of revenue despite of acute shortage of working hands at Range level. They are attending the work related to taxpayers assistance/Seva Kendra, processing of ARNs, taxpayers communications and action/replies thereof, preparation of periodical reports and others miscellaneous reports besides the reports asked by higher authorities in specific formats, assistance to visiting audit/inspection team and compliances of their objections and audit paras, to attend/brief the departmental representative/counsel in all appellate levels and court cases from lower court to Supreme Court, analysis and preparation of para-wise comments on appeals, writ petitions, special leave petitions, civil appeals, prosecution matters besides other related court matters viz monitoring of progress of the appellate/court cases, preparation of the appeal papers, replies/counter affidavit etc. and filing thereof through departmental representative/counsel in the respective appellate authority/courts, preparation of the SCNs and adjudication orders for higher authorities, verification of data/papers, drafting work, issuance of SCN and adjudication thereof of own competency, analysis and monitoring of revenue trend, collection of revenue, identification of non-filers and to initiate appropriate action, recovery of the arrears, to initiate the enquiries on references received from the various GST formations (both Central and State) and the cases identified by DGRAM on various parameters, submission of the verification reports and to take effective action thereon, verification of the refund claims, other incentive matters and conditional exemption matters, scrutiny/assessment of returns assigned by the assessment module (if any), all pending legacy matters/issues etc. and many more.

7. It may be appreciated that Range Officer is doing work in all the spheres which can’t even be imagined by our higher authorities whereas a substantial quantum of the said workload can be retained at the offices above the Range level. It is worth to mention that Range Officers have been provided the least infrastructure and in the most of the cases much below the DGHRD norms too. Further, they are dealing with thousands of assessees individually without any assisting hands.  Many of them are dealing with more than 10 thousands assesses on individual basis against the model of 300-400 under GST. Moreover, they are working only with one or less Inspector. The situation of the shortage of manpower is so terrible that Asstt./Deputy Commissioners, Superintendents and Inspectors are already working with multiple/additional charges without any incentive. Practically, the responsibilities of higher levels have been shifted to the lower/Range Offices by overburdening them day by day. The higher offices have become just reporting offices doing only routine works.

8. For example, in implementation of SVLDRS, the CBIC wished that Designated Committee should examine and dispose off the declaration. But, in all cases, reports were sought from the Range Offices and Designated Committees acted on the basis of Range reports. The scheme was promulgated based on online module but files were opened and reports were called from Rangen Offices etc. manually and only then the decisions were taken, which was against the vision of the scheme. In our CBIC, it has become a culture to workload junior/lower officers by piling up work with them resulting into tremendous work pressure on them whereas higher officers have least work with more and more idle time with luxury infrastructure. It is need of the time now that work flow should not go below the specified level. With the introduction of the e-office, it can be done effectively and efficiently, if CBIC desires so.

9. Dr. Jeetesh Nagori has ordered the task for scrutiny of the returns with specific numbers without going into the details of the terrible workload with the Range Officer and without making efforts that the Range Officer should not be loaded with more new offline task. His letter seems to be threatening and without considering the ground reality of the situation of infrastructure, IT and other issues. Basic premise of GST regime is contactless, faceless and technology driven. Accordingly, module has been developed/under development as per timeline of the CBIC. The scrutiny of returns by not following the AIO module/task list is/was never intended by the CBIC. Had this been the intention, then there was no need to develop the AIO module/task list in back end application. It has come to the notice of this Association that the Range Officers are acting on the task list populated on their login screen of AIO and there is no such pendency on the AIO of Range Officer which needs the issuance of such threatening order as issued by Dr. Jeetesh Nagori. Rather it seems that he wants to undertake the task by not following the assessment module and without issuance of any SOP by CBIC in this regard for the reasons best known to him only.

10. It is reiterated that the AIACEGEO, in the proposal of the cadre re-structuring, has already emphasized for the allocation of the assessment work upto the highest level in direct proportion to the pay packages and  the Association requests for the same again. It is also need of the time that workload and work flow may be re-visited and a proper allocation of work may be assigned at all the levels of hierarchy with defined tail end (i.e., specific level below which work should not flow).

11. In view of above, it is requested to kindly:

(i) Direct the concerned authorities not to issue such threatening letter which spoils working atmosphere.

(ii) Relook the workload being undertaken by the Range Officers to shred off it.

(iii) To assign the assessment/scrutiny of return upto the highest levels in direct proportion of pay packages on the pattern of State GST and Income Tax.

(iv) Not direct the Range Officers for scrutiny of return or assessment by not followingthe assessment module or in absence of any SOP to this effect issued by CBIC.

(v) Not undertake scrutiny of the return/assessment in offline mode. 

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,

Encls: As above.                                                                                                                            

(HARPAL SINGH),

Secretary General.

Encl Ref. No. 310/AIB/R/18 Dt. 26.11.18

ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE

GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

President:                                    Address for communication:                                       Secretary General:

A. Venkatesh                        240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.)                                              Ravi Malik

Mob.7780255361  mail Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com, Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in      Mob.9868816290

Vice Presidents: Apurba Roy, P. C. Jha (East); A. K. Meena, Somnath Chakrabarty (west); Ashish Vajpayee, Ravi Joshi (North); B. Pavan K. Reddy, M. Jegannathan (South); K.V. Sriniwas, T. J. Manojuman (Central) Joint Secretaries: Ajay Kumar, R. N. Mahapatra (East); B. S. Meena, Sanjeev Sahai (West); Harpal Singh, Sanjay Srivastava (North); M. Nagraju, P. Sravan Kumar (South); Anand Kishore, Ashutosh Nivsarkar (Central) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma T reasuer: N. R. Manda Organising Secretary: Soumen Bhattachariya

(Recognised by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)

Ref. No. 310/AIB/R/18                                                                          Dt. 26.11.18

To,

Dr John Joseph,

Special Secretary & Member, CBIC,

North Block, New Delhi.

Sub: Workload of officers working in the Ranges.

Sir,

Kindly refer to the DO letter Dt. 14.11.18 of your goodself on the subject mentioned matter.

2. It is to submit with due regards that the workload being faced by the officers working in the Ranges is being presented by the Association regularly before the administration. It is reiterated that they are overburdened on account of innumerable reports which are being asked every hour from them despite of the fact that the same can be produced centrally by the proper use of the system. They are working with more than 1000 assessees per Range in comparison to 300 with the State GST counterparts in the circles as average. Many Ranges are also having the assessees even to the tune of 12000-14000. They are also working with acute shortage of manpower (1 to 1.5) per Range also with additional charges in comparison to 5 in the State GST as average without any additional charge. The State GST officers have been provided one four wheeler vehicle per Circle for efficient disposal of work whereas no vehicle is provided to our Ranges. This all has very well been depicted by Sh. B. B. Agarwal in his note sent to the Board. If we talk in terms of pay scale and career prospects, the officers working under State GST Circles are also having higher designation, career prospects and pay scales than the counterparts working in the Ranges under CGST despite of being same level. Our officers in Ranges are working even without required infrastructure, proper and prescribed office space, prescribed facilities and amenities and also without due resources.   

            3. The Association believes that the intention of your kind letter is also to use the system properly and meaningfully to relax the officers working in the Ranges who are really having no time due to being overburdened and also being forced to work beyond office hours and holidays under tremendous pressure.

            4. The Range was designed to working cell of the department. Over the years, the work of the Ranges has shifted from physical control, supervision, assessment, permission to today where no interaction is supposed with the taxpayers. However, the administration has apparently not considered any change in functions or formation of the Ranges. Every sundry work is assigned to the Range offices whether comments on the orders of legal courts or comments on the complex issues of law or statistical data which can be easily availed centrally without asking from the field formations.Every work in the department is initiated at the Range level without any recognition. Even the tone and tenor of the letters and verbal directions are always appalling creating panic, pressure and tension.

            5.One of the best examples is the expected Physical Verification of the taxpayers as per the ‘risk’ factors identified by the system. From the figures available, no report can be generated regarding this. It is estimated that more than 50% of the total taxpayers have been identified as having at least a risk factor and there is no instruction on which risk factor/s are to be prioritized. The advisory requires the officer to use a smart phone to identify the longitude and latitude of the taxpayer and it is mandatory though not a risk factor. So, the taxpayers not selected for Physical Verification would not have this mandatory field filled. If it is so important, it should be a mandatory field for registration itself. If the officer has to visit the location of the taxpayer mandatorily, the location cannot be identified even with a Smartphone under the circumstances. There is no provision for transportation of so many officers to so many locations and no Smartphone has been provided to the officers. The administration has not given a thought for providing the due infrastructure, necessary for the demanded work to be done. However, a progress report of the same is definitely required.Thus, it can be seen that verification is a time consuming process and efficiency and expediency depend upon the response of the tax payers and subsequent monitoring and submission of documents in time. Therefore, great amount of man hours of the Executive staff are spent generating, verifying, compiling and monitoring various reports so that authenticated information sent to the higher authorities.

            6. Even the report asked by your goodself is required to be given by each Range Officer on daily basis. Many man hours cannot be accounted in 20-22 days a month. For example, at least four meetings/Video Conferences in a month means 4-6 days (preparation & compliance) for almost all officers. RTI; Rajbhasha/Vigilance/Swachta pakhwaras, Special refund drive fortnights, taxpayer outreach programmes/hand holding, preparation & compliance for inspections by DGPM, Parliamentary Committee on Rajbhasha & others, CERA audit & compliance, Legacy matters relating to refunds and otherwise, SCNs, Adjudication, verification of returns (MFR/risk based) etc. take time which cannot be quantified. Study of legacy laws and GST laws for understanding & proper invocation on case to case basis may take a lot of time and brain storming. GST work relating to Non Filers, TRAN-1 verification starting from old returns, sensing doubtful/abnormal credit, checking various documents with GST transitional provisions takes so much time and energy with the GST portal showing technical issues frequently. GST refunds sanctioned and paid through PFMS take their own time. Refund claims received from States for payment through PFMS, cancellation of registration, GST practitioners registration, random checks of returns for revenue and other reports like MPR, periodical reports alongwith ad hoc reports/informations are other areas of work. The work further includes appeals to be filed before Commissioner (Appeals) & CESTAT, parawise comments for filing appeals before CESTAT/Courts, going through the cases and case laws to brief the Counsel, responding queries of taxpayers, visits to sensitive taxpayers to file returns etc. It takes whole day to cover just 2-3 taxpayers to get registered. Time taken in cases of inquiry and investigation depends on nature of each case. Work relating to E-way bill etc. is an additional work consuming a lot of time beyond working hours.

            7. The computerization in the Department actually took care of day to day work neither in pre-GST nor GST era, that’s why the officers are overburdened and forced to look into every matter manually. The digitalization of data is still under development. Besides that the legacy work is still under process. The following points may give a picture of our overburdened officers working in the Ranges under tremendous pressure-

(A) Multi fold increase in number of Tax Payers:- The number of registered assessees in pre-GST regime were much less. The threshold exemption limit has been set to Rs. 20 lac only which was Rs. 150 lac in the Central Excise regime which has resulted into increase in number of assessees. Moreover, this Department was dealing only with manufacturers and service providers in pre-GST era but presently, all sources of business/supply of goods/supply of services have been added to the scope of work and this is another reason for increase of number of assessees. The Taxpayers are facing various difficulties in meeting with their GST obligations and they frequently contact the Range Officers for solving their problems. The Department has already communicated the mobile numbers of the Range Officers to the assessees and for this reason, the officers have to spare a good time for solution of the problems being faced by the Taxpayers. 

(B) The GST network is not perfectly developed till date:- It goes without saying that the GST network is still in the process of development. The Taxpayers as well as the departmental officers have been facing a number of troubles on the system. The solution to these problems is awaited from higher levels. The system is slow and takes a lot of time. The electronic working is not smooth, user friendly and time saving as was expected.

(C) Insufficient information given by the system:- Previously, in pre-GST regime, the details/ figures of turnover, value and duty/tax paid in cash and through credit account were being obtained from the individual assessee every month. The data so obtained was used to maintain assessment register reflecting complete details (commodity wise/service wise) in respect of individual assessee. This data was useful and also helpful in generation of any kind of information like commodity wise duty payment, service wise tax payment, top assessees, top commodities, top services audit schedule etc. This data was also useful for preparation of information pertaining to the parliamentary questions, RTI etc. However, the system now is providing only raw data in respect of taxpayers and that too incomplete. Such data has to be further processed for adhoc reports, parliament question, RTI applications etc. Therefore, the time consumed in reporting has not been reduced but increased.

(D) Continuation of reports:- It was expected that the GST network would well prepare all source of information required for the purpose of indirect tax administration and no report would be required to be prepared by the subordinate offices/field formations. But the authorities at different levels are seeking reports from their subordinate offices/field formations continuously. The most of the times, the reports are called on urgent and immediate basis creating panic and pressure. Unlike the previous tax regime, such reports are forwarded to the Range levels. The GST system frequently fails to provide the necessary content for generating the reports resulting in consumption of huge time.

(E) Field works required to be conducted in GST regime:- Needless to say that any type of tax generates the revenue for the Government but evasion of the tax also goes simultaneously. There will always be evasions and litigations in any kind of tax regime on account of the tax evasion. The GST Law has also provided preventive measures to curb evasion of tax. There are provisions of checking of e-way bills on roadsides, scrutiny, audit, searches etc. for the safeguard of revenue. Such provisions require the officers to visit out of the office leaving aside the table works having no limit of time. Such field works can only be performed manually and the computer system is of no use for this purpose. Presently, the staff available does not suffice to meet the requirements of the fieldworks due to acute shortage of manpower. In the case of the officers being engaged in the field works, the official table works remain held up completely because the Range Offices are being run by only one Superintendent and less than one Inspector and many of whom are having additional charges. Thus, much more manpower is required for an efficient field as well as office working.

(F) Issues relating to notices, adjudications, recoveries, litigations etc.:- The issues relating to the notices, adjudications, recovery of tax & other dues, litigations etc. are almost the same as were in the previous tax regime. These all used to take considerable time and will continue to demand more time and mental as well as physical labour in the present system also. The electronic system will be of no use for the aforesaid procedures and such works are to be carried out manually only.

(G) Legacy works:- The legacy works pertaining to the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Finance Act, 1994 are not over till date. The officers have been directed to carry out the scrutiny of the returns. There are also the cases of verification of the third party data received from the Income Tax Department which requires the officers to verify the taxability and tax payment of the amounts received by the parties. This verification is time consuming. Similarly, the detailed scrutiny of ST-3 Returns is also under process. Furthermore, there is no way to dispense with the cases of recovery of the Government dues since most of the cases are lying in appeal with higher authorities and courts. These cases demand attention and time on regular basis. The legacy works with the department cannot be ignored and the same is also the significant reason of overburdening of the officers working in Range Offices.

            8. In nutshell, the officers working in the Ranges are performing the following work functions among others-

1.         Generation of revenue reports from the AIO dashboard and compilation of the same.

2.         Processing of amendment in registration/cancellation of registration requests/amendment in Email Id, professional address and phone numbers of the assessees.

3.         Handholding/guiding and clarifying the issues being faced by the tax payers and taking up the issue at the appropriate level so that the problem faced by the tax payers get resolved.

4.         TRAN-I verification of the list supplied by the Headquarters and necessary correspondence with the tax payers for verification of the documents on the basis of which they have taken the credit. TRAN-1 verification starting from old returns, sensing doubtful/abnormal credit, checking various documents with GST transitional provisions.

5.         Verification of the difference between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B figures and reporting of the same.

6.         Identification of non-filers and issuing notices to the defaulters as persuasive measure so that returns are filed along with payment of due tax liability.

7.         Visit to non-filers, which itself is time consuming keeping in view the shortage of the manpower.

8.         Verification of the difference between credit taken in GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B figures and reporting of the same and in case of discrepancy, taxpayer is asked to reverse the excess credit in the GSTR-3B return to be filed in the succeeding month.

9.         Processing of GST Refunds/consequential relief refunds in a time bound manner.

10.     Initiating registration cancellation proceedings on voluntary surrender requests of the tax payers after determining the tax liability.

11.     Refund claim received from the states for payment through PFMS, random checks of returns for revenue and other reports like MPR, periodical reports with ad-hoc reports/informations and other areas of work.

12.     Study of legacy laws, GST laws (transitional provisions) for understanding and proper invocation consuming time and requiring brain storming.

13.     A number of meetings/video conferences means a lot of time and effort being devoted in preparation and compliance for almost all officers.

14.     Tax arrears recovery involving persuasive action and necessary correspondence with various authorities for identification of the assets/property and subsequent reminders for seeking desired information along withvisits to the premises of the defaulters.

15.     Legal matters–drafting and filing of appeals and submitting them to the CESTATs and higher Courts, which also involve long travels to the place of court.

16.     A number of programmes like Swwachta Pakhwada, Vigilance Pakhwada, Special refund drives fortnights, taxpayer outreach programmes/handholding of assessees, preparation and compliance for inspections by higher authorities, DGPM, parliamentary committee on Raj Bhasha, CERA audit and other agencies

17.     Issuance of Show Cause Notices pertaining to the Superintendent competency and drafting/forwarding of Show Cause Notices to Asstt. Commissioner/Joint Commissioner/Commissioner of their competency well in time.

18.     Delivery of Personal Hearing letters/Show Cause Notices/Order-In-Originals and Order-In-Appeals received from other divisional formations/ Hqrs and drawing Panchnama on the spot, if the assessee is not available at the given address.

19.     Verification of the invoices/documents mentioned in the letters received from other Divisional formations/Commissionerates and submit the verification report to Division office for forwarding it to the respective jurisdiction under dated acknowledgement.

20.     Aiding the Hqrs (Preventive/Anti Evasion) staff in their operation as and when they require for carrying out necessary proceedings.

21.     DAK correspondence/email checking and taking requisite action thereon accordingly.

22.     Officers from Ranges are also deputed for E-way bill checking.

23.     Preparation of weekly reports on refunds, daily registrations, Suo Moto cancellation and non filers.

24.     Preparation of fortnightly reports on Non-Filers, GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B difference, GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B difference, uploading of GST refund report on DDM, TRAN-1 credit verification.

25.     Preparation of MPR (Revenue and Non-Revenue) updation of the arrear cases and reporting recovery affected in the monthly TAR report sent to the Hqrs.

26.     Preparation of the Third Party report and taking requisite action for affecting recovery and safeguarding Government revenue by issuing Show Cause Notices wherever required.

27.     Updation and review of the Anti Evasion legacy cases and taking requisite action accordingly.

28.     Updation of various registers including GST refund registers/records and prepare abstract on monthly basis.

29.     Updation and submission of TRAN-I verification report on monthly basis.

30.     Attending the Court proceedings in the prosecution cases and taking necessary correspondence with the witnesses/formation to be resent for examination/cross examination.

31.     Follow up enquiry in cases booked by Anti-Evasion/Preventive.

32.     Writ petitions received seeking para wise comment from GST policy wing.

33.     Dealing with PMO references, Parliamentary questions, RTIs, CPGRAMs etc.

34.     Helping and providing the visiting A.G. (Audit) teams with documents and records asked for conduction of the audit proceedings of Range office as well Division office.

35.     Preparation of various miscellaneous reports asked from higher formations like SIIB, DGCI etc.

36.     Preparation of Inspection Note and updation of records on visits by the higher authorities for the Division office as well as Range offices for conducting the yearly Inspection.

37.     Holding the charge of DDO due to acute shortage of AOs.

38.     Writing letters to the tax payers to seek clarification and submit requisite documents for verification.

39.     Verifying that credit available on capital goods is not taken 100% during the first year in their book of accounts.

40.     Checking of the succeeding GSTR-3B return to ascertain that the credit has been reversed and debited.

41.     Physical Verification in connection to the advisory for Physical Verification of Registration issued by the DGS&DM.

9. No need to say that there may be many other unforeseen and unseen various types of works being performed by the officers working in the Ranges. In actual terms, they are being used as multi-purpose tools in our organization including official as well as unofficial purposes/protocols.

10. Accordingly, the works being performed in the Range offices may be briefed as below-

A. Legacy issues

A1. RnC work

A2. Preliminary Scrutiny

A3. Detailed Manual Scrutiny

A4. Third Party Investigation

A5. Draft SCN

A6. Preparing Regular Monthly Reports

A7. Comments on Reply to SCN

A8. Arrear Recovery

A9. Interest calculations

A10. Interrogatory statements 

A11. Adjudication orders

A12. Serving of SCNs and Adjudication orders

A13. Compliance of Audit Reports

A14. Data analysis to detect cases

A15. Ad-hoc Reports in new formats on urgent requirement

A16. Check & verify challans deposited against CEX ST

B. GST issues

B1. Registration & Migration

B2. Generation of new user id/pwd

B3. Cancellation of Registration

B4. Tracing of non-filers 

B5. Notice to non-filers

B6. Personal Hearing to non-filers

B7. Tracing of late filers

B8. Notice to late filers

B9. Interest calculation and notice to late filers

B10. Suo-moto cancellation Notice to non-filers of GSTR3B

B11. GSTR3B vs GSTR1 mismatch check

B12. Notice on B11 above

B13. Cash-Credit Ratio on GST payments

B14. Match Cash-Credit Ratio of post-GST vs pre-GST and analyse reasons for changes

B15. GSTR3B vs GSTR2A

B16. TRAN1 verification

B17. Remove data on late fee paid from Reports of AIO to get cash paid in GST

B18. E-way Bill verification

B19. Verification and Report on Refund Issues

B20. Ad-hoc Reports on new formats on urgent requirement

B21. Inspection and search operation under GST

B22. Data analysis to detect fraud of GST

B23. Interrogatory statement before SCN

B24. Issue SCN under S73 and S74

B25. Adjudication

B26. Helpdesk

B27. Address verification

B28. Processing of GST refund

B29. E way bill checking.

B30. GST Registration issue

B31. Monthly/ Fortnightly meeting with Division & Hqrs.

B32. Inspection/Audit of Range by CERA Audit team and rectification work thereof 

B33. Inspection by AC/DC.

B34. Various regular reports

B35. Keep ourselves updated with the daily changing effects of GSTN Council meeting, Notification, Circulars, Act and Rules.

            11. If we talk only in terms of single point of refund, no need to say that this process in itself is very complicated and lengthy. This process of disposal of GST refund may be taken into account while evaluating the performance/workload of Superintendents and Inspectors working in the Range offices as every work being done by them may be lengthy, time consuming and complicated in practical terms. Different Stages of GST refund processing are depicted as below after the receipt of GST refund claim:

1.      Individual file is opened after making entry in File Opening register,

2.      Entry is made in respective refund register prescribed for the purpose,

3.       After initial checking, if need be, deficiency memo is issued to the party in time bound manner and entry is made in respective register,

4.      After receipt of reply from the party in r/o deficiency memo, again entry is made in respective register,

5.      Then the claim is checked with respect to completion of documents. If found in order, acknowledgment is issued in time bound manner. A unique number is allotted to the acknowledgment letter and entry is made in respective register,

6.      Copy of the claim is sent to the jurisdictional Range Superintendent for verification of the claim/ pending dues against the party,

7.      After initial checking of the documents, 90% of the claimed amount is sanctioned within 7 days in RFD-04. A unique number is allotted to the RFD-04 and entry is made in respective register,

8.      In case of Central Tax, Payment Advice in form RFD-05 is issued to the party and a copy to the A.O./P & A.O. A unique number is allotted to the RFD-05 and entry is made in respective register,

9.      Then, RFD-04 and claim of the party are scanned and provided to the Divisional Assistant Commissioner for sending to the SGST/A.O. of the Division, as the case may be.

10.  One original copy of the order and copy of the claim is also sent to the A.O. for sending the same further to P & A O.

11.  In certain cases where refund amount appears to be inadmissible, SCN in form RFD-08 is issued to the party and entry is made in respective register.  Thereafter, adjudication procedure is adopted to dispose off the case. After adjudicating the SCN, refund procedure is again initiated on merit of the case.

12.   After issuing provisional refund order, the case is taken up for final order in time bound manner. At this stage, all documents are required to be scrutinized. After scrutiny of the documents, inadmissible amount/adjustment is deducted and final order in RFD-06 is issued. A unique number is allotted to the RFD-06 and entry is made in respective register,

13.  Again, in case of Central Tax, Payment Advice in form RFD-05 is issued to the party and a copy to the A.O./P & A.O. A unique number is allotted to the RFD-05 and entry is made in respective register.

14.  Then, RFD-06 and claim of the party are scanned and provided to the Divisional Assistant Commissioner for sending to the SGST/A.O. of the Division, as the case may be.

15.  Brief Note/Review Note of the case is prepared and sent to the Review Branch alongwith copy of the RFD-06.

16.  Entire file is sent to the Audit branch for post audit alongwith copy of the RFD-06. The assiduous task of photocopying the entire file is done so that shadow file is kept in the branch for future reference.

17.  Then, the inadmissible amount/rejected amount is required to be re-credited in ECL of the party by issuing RFD-01B/ PMT-03.

18.  Apart from above, there are many weekly/ fortnightly and monthly reports in r/o refund which are sent to Headquarters. Sometimes, reports on daily basis are also called by the Headquarter office.

19.  Work related with Nodal Officer:The work related with Nodal Officer requires one person dedicated for this task only. A lot of RFD-04 and RFD-06 orders are received from Nodal Officer of SGST department through e-mail on daily basis. After taking print-out of the said orders, copies of the orders are sent to respective jurisdictional Assistant Commissioners for necessary action. In the respective Division, Payment Advice in r/o RFD-04/ RFD-06 orders is prepared and sent to A. O./ P& A.O. for payment. A separate file for this purpose is being maintained in the Division.

20.  Similarly, Nodal Officer has to forward all the RFD-04/ RFD-06 orders passed by CGST Divisions to the Nodal Officer of SGST department through e-mail for further necessary action at their end.

12.  Some of the major reasons causing problems and troubles at Range level are as below:-

1.      Slow speed of GST Portal.

2.      Applications of GST portal are not in consonance with the requirement of report generation as desired.

3.      Sometimes, assessee applying for registrations or LUTs for export online do not get their work done in time due to some statutory requirement or some technical glitches but all such work is being dealt at CPC and aggrieved person contacts for resolution of the issues in local office. System generated mail or CBEC Mitra helpline instructs him to contact to local authorities but local authorities are not in the position to solve the problems as their portal does not support so. Aggrieved persons/their consultants argue endlessly and both time and energy of Range Officer is wasted in such replies.

4.      Retrieval of data from GST portal is herculean task as officer has to check details month wise, assessee wise first and then to compile as desired. For example, list of registrants is not in chronological order on the portal, revenue comparison for a particular period tax payer wise or HSN wise is not available.

5.      The most of the Range officers are having additional Charge of Division and of Headquarters. All works are to be dealt on priority as all are time bound and of priority.

6.      The miscellaneous work of regular reports, day to day reports, reports from GST portal for which system is not inbuilt, letters of PH, Show cause Notices, Adjudication orders, Personal hearings, letters returned undelivered, issuing reminders, visiting places/sites for service of notices, work as Com Admin and GST cell, persons visiting for their queries in GST help desk etc. require more efforts which may take substantial time.

7.      It is not possible to search the tax payer by its trade name on Range GST Portal. If any officer wants to enquire the GST compliance of his jurisdiction by its name, it is not possible until one has PAN number of the party.

8.      GST portal on OIA logs out automatically and again logging takes time.

9.      In ACES, to scrutinizer-1/ER-3 or ST-3 returns of any assessee for each return from the list appearing, one has to fill the assessee details, date and time period each time which consumes much time.

10.  All Ranges and additional work allotted to Range Officers are being dealt with acutely short manpower. There is no availability of ministerial staff for support work. There is need for proper allocation of contingentsfor each Section on account of insufficient sepoys/havaldars available for manual work of office, arranging files, file movement,  making Photostat copies and arranging them in order particularly for preparing SCNs and in adjudication etc. All these works require responsibility, know-how of office procedure, substantial time and energy. So, skilled contingents are need of the day. This situation is overall affecting performance of Range Superintendent and his/her only one or half Inspector.

11.  Sometimes, Range staff is not in position to understand the importance of reports asked all of a sudden. For example, report of Cancellation of Registration started to be asked suddenly is being asked now weekly and even daily. Once screen shots of Range Officer GST portal were asked along with report (by Lucknow CCO) on Whatsapp. This report was recently asked updated up to 13th Nov, 18, then up to 15th Nov, 18 for CC Level Video conference. Range Officers have to work in hurry as pendency is required to be NIL. If all cancellations filed by the tax payers are to be approved in speedy manner, such requests are not required to come to backend GST portal of Range Superintendent.

12.  It is also on record that work is also done on weekends by the Range staff either under instructions of the Department or by own volition of the Range Officers to evade any unwelcomed situation in the matters which are time bound. Availing leaves has become the matter of past.

13. Thus, the practice of seeking every report or comments every time from Range level should be examined in the light of monthly reports and other letters sent by the Range and their availability on GST or ACES portal. If any report is possible to be generated from higher level in totality, it should not be asked from Ranges as efforts are multiplied in that proportion. The Standard Formats of Daily/Weekly/ Monthly/Quarterly/Yearly reports should also be made in ZCDR (Zone, Commissionerate, Division, Range) stages, so that all other reports may be generated from those reports. In case of any new report, sufficient time and its GST/ACES path and guidelines may be provided in covering letter as much confusion remains and each Range interprets in its own way. For example, if GST revenue and Non GST revenue comparison is asked over two years, it should be cleared which components whether VAT, CENVAT, other taxes subsumed in pre GST era or Central Excise Duty, Service Tax, Cesses etc. has/ have to be included in Non GST Revenue and which components whether CGST, SGST, IGST, ITC of each, Cess etc. has/have to be included in GST Revenue. CENVAT revenue of pre GST era is not available in reports generated from ACES. It may be arrived only by opening each monthly/quarterly/half yearly return filed by each tax payer at that time. Such calculation is not possible by available means in the present situation. Online Path to arrive at monthly data of GST registrants or data for comparative revenue analysis of top taxpayers of Range or data of non-filers who have filed returns and revenue deposited by such filers is not known to the Range. Such reports asked in urgent manner on Email/Whatsapp worsen the situation of work load in more stressful way.

14. The letter of the Chief commissioner of Chandigarh/Panchkula and also your office response on the same irrespective of outcome are self-explanatory to depict the acute work-burden being faced by the officers working in the Range Offices.

15. The above submissions have been made with the request to allot more manpower to Range Offices, especially looking into the circumstances that the most of the officers are having additional charges. The additional charges mean doubling/tripling of workload and official troubles. Immediate provision for infrastructure for officers to carry out the physical verification of registration, e-way bill verification, necessary smartphones and vehicles are also required to be provided to commensurate with the work to be done alongwith taking due steps regarding all of above submissions.

Thanking you,       

Yours sincerely,

                                                                                    Sd.

(RAVI MALIK),

Secretary General.