" IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF AIACEGEO. THIS IS THE ONLY ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERINTENDENTS OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND IRS OFFICERS PROMOTED FROM THE GRADE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE THROUGH OUT THE COUNTRY . President Mr.T.Dass and SG Mr. Harpal Singh.

Friday 31 January 2014

ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:                                          Address for communication:                               Secretary General:
Lokanath Mishra                        240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.)                                      Ravi Malik
Mob. 09437314941                      mail Id: ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com                         Mob. 09868816290
Vice Presidents: Sampat Rai, Vatan Kamble (Central); Anurag Chaudhary, Ravi Joshi (North); A. Ravinder Singh, Rajan G. George (South); A. S. Roy, Shubhrangshu Deb (East); P. D. Nimhan, S. K. Jha (West)
Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, Laxmi Lal Singhvi (Central); N. N. Lal, R. K. Solanki (North); G. Srinath, S. Chandrasekar (South); Ashwini Majhi, V. N. Jha (East); G. K. Jhala, M. K. Misra (West)
Office Secretary: C.S.Sharma (Mob. 09313885411)         Treasurer: N.R.Manda (Mob. 09871483585)
(Recognised by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 24/R/14                                                                          Dt. 30.01.14
To,
Sh. Najib Shah,
Chairperson, Committee for Operational Issues including reorganisation etc. in r/o cadre restructuring,
I. P. Bhawan, New Delhi.
Sub: Reorganisation of Commissionerates.
Sir,
As the Association came to know, it is submitted with due regards that the overall number of the Commissionerates in r/o cadre restructuring is going to be reduced by subtracting or adding at some places at this stage after the final approval and notification of the cadre restructuring. It is further submitted that the number of posts may also require reduction by this on account of overall revamping of the process despite of the approval upto the level of Cabinet. This deviation after the approval from Cabinet, Cadre Review Committee, Finance Minister, CBEC and other nodal departments on the basis of the reports of Study Groups may be looked as the misrepresentation of the actual facts and may also delay the implementation of the Cadre Restructuring.
2. This process of reduction of the Commissionerates at this stage seems unjustified & unwarranted because there is no negative change in the factors like workload, revenue etc., rather these factors are on regular increase. The Board constituted well in advance the Study Groups as part of the Cadre Restructuring and assigned them the exercise of reorganisation of different Zones and Commissionerates by way of examining the detailed revenue & workload of the field formations, legislative changes of the statute, staffing norms etc. among others. The Study Groups after a detailed examination suggested the reorganisation of all Zones and Commissionerates corroborated with due statistics. The proposals were duly approved by the appropriate authorities. Thus, any change at this stage seems unwarranted and will merely give an unwanted impression to the concerned higher authorities about us. We are merely challenging the caliber of our former authorities including Study Groups and field formations by making any reduction/amendment at this stage particularly when there is no reduction in workload and revenue.
3. The various Committees in relation of Cadre Restructuring should have been constituted with the intention to facilitate the smooth implementation of the already approved Cadre Restructuring by the highest authorities instead of making any amendment at this stage. The re-examination of the studies regarding workload, revenue & other aspects will only negate & annul the already accepted reports of the Study Groups threatening the finally approved entire Cadre Restructuring which has been approved based on the findings of these Study Groups. Such re-examination will reopen the process of Cadre Restructuring, delay its implementation and our officers will keep retiring without promotion. As a consequence, the efforts to reduce the number of originally proposed Commissionerates may de-motivate our workforce particularly at the places to be affected by this reduction. The proposed reduction in contrary to their bonafide belief has already evoked strong reaction from the staffside throughout the country.
4. If number of Commissionerates is reduced in any Zone, not only the promotional avenues for Inspectors, Ministerial Officers etc. will be reduced there as a result but the number of postings for group A officers (promotee as well as direct) of that Zone would also be reduced and they will have to be transferred to other Zones. This will pose great hardships particularly before the promotee officers being promoted at the fag end of the career. No need to submit that our Superintendents would be the worst affected by this on account  of  being  promoted to the post of Asstt. Commissioner at the age group very vulnerable to various


old age diseases & deformities. Neither they will be able to live alone at new place leaving their family at old place nor be able to make new settlement at the new place near retirement.
5. As your goodself knows, the Cabinet approved 119 Commissionerates for Central Excise, 22 for Service Tax, 45 for Audit and 60 for Customs. Any deviation/reduction from the approval of Cabinet may not please the higher authorities upto the level of Cabinet which may be disastrous for our organisation and against our future interests. The Commissionerates need to be created on the basis of workload, revenue etc. at each place under the respective Zone as per the norms fixed by the IInd Study Group instead of making any overall or intra-zonal change in the number. But contrary to it, the Commissionerates are also being created at the places with revenue & workload less than even the prescribed norms while not being created despite of many times more revenue & workload at many places. For example, Raipur Commissionerate deserves not only to be at least tri-furcated but one Audit Commissionerate should also be created there alongwith in accordance of the revenue & workload. Not only it, the Customs formations to be created under the jurisdiction of Central Excise Zones should also be manned by the Central Excise personnel only as per the existing system and long well-established practice at all places including Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, Mumbai, Patna-Ranchi-Jamshedpur, Thiruchirapalli, Guntur, Visakhapatnam, Shillong, Goa, Lucknow, Cochin, Pune, Vadodara etc. Zones/Commissionerates.
6. In view of the above, it is requested that-
i) No reduction may kindly be made in the number of Commissionerates in any Zone in comparison to original proposal.
ii) The Commissionerates may kindly be created in the Zones based on the revenue & workload. 
iii) The Customs formations to be created under the jurisdiction of Central Excise Zones may kindly be manned by Central Excise personnel.   
            Thanking you,
                                                                                                                                                Yours faithfully,           

 (RAVI MALIK),
                                                                                                             Secretary General.
Copy with the request for necessary action to:
i) The DG, HRD, CBEC, New Delhi.
ii) The Member (P&V), CBEC, North Block, New Delhi.
iii) The Chairperson, CBEC, North Block, New Delhi.
iv) The Revenue Secretary, North Block, New Delhi.




(RAVI MALIK)