ALL
INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:
Address for communication:
Secretary General:
R. Chandramouli 240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001
(U.P.)
Ravi Malik
Mob. 08939955463 mail
Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com,
Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in Mob.
09868816290
Vice
Presidents: P. Parwani, L. L. Singhvi (Central); AnuragChaudhary, Ravi
Joshi (North); N. Raman, G. Srinath (South); B. K. Sinha, AshwiniMajhi (East);
Rajesh Chaher, J. D. Patil (West) Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, J.
S. Aiyer (Central); R. K. Solanki, AshishVajpeyi (North); M. Nagaraju,
Ajithkumar P. C. (South); P. K. Sen, S. Bhattachariya (East); JasramMeena, M.
K. Mishra (West) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma
Treasurer:
N. R. MandaLiaison Secretary: A.
S. KunduCoordinator on Telangana: P.
Shravan Kumar
(Recognised
by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 44/R/17
Dt. 14.03.17
REMINDER
PL.
To,
Sh. Najib Shah,
Chairman, CBEC,
North Block, New Delhi.
Sub: Renewal of recognition.
Sir,
Kindly
refer to the following communications of the Association-
i)
Ref. No. 218/R/14 Dt. 26.11.14. ii) Ref. No. 06/R/15 Dt. 27.01.15.
iii)
Ref. No. 112/R/15 Dt. 08.09.15. iv) Ref. No.
156/R/15 Dt. 27.12.15.
v)
Ref. No. 171/R/16 Dt. 13.10.16.
2.
Your kind attention is also invited to the letter F. No. CBEC-10C13(12)/1/2016-Ad.II
B Dt. 29.09.16 mentioning that the recognition of this Association has lapsed
on 20.01.15 and proposal for renewal is awaited.
3.
It is further submitted with due regards that the recognition of this
Association has never lapsed as
there is no provision of renewal of a Service Association under RSA, 1993
Rules. Rules say only about recognition without any mandate for renewal. It is
also worth to submit that there exists no other Association to represent the
Central Excise Superintendents.
4.
However, the recognition of the Association was renewed on being insisted by
the concerned section vide letter F. No. 12017/10/2012-Ad.IVA Dt. 25.02.13 of
the CBEC further for 5 years. It means that there arises no question of lapse
of recognition prior to 25.02.18 even as per the version of the concerned
section.
5.
However despite of no renewal required, this Association sent the renewal
proposal vide its communication under Ref. No. 218/R/14 Dt. 26.11.14 well in
advance on insistence of the concerned section which was responded after more
than one year by that section vide letter F.No.B. 12017/09/2015-AdIVA Dt.
11.12.15. Again despite of no requirement of renewal under the current rules,
all queries were replied vide Ref. No. 156/R/15 Dt. 27.12.15 by the Association
immediately after receiving the above said letter from the concerned section.
6.
This Association has been complying all the conditions and Govt. instructions
set out in the CCS (RSA) Rules, 1993 and will keep complying the same
regularly. It is also worth to submit that the recognition of the Association
has never been withdrawn due to any lapse in complying the conditions or due to
any other reason.
7.
In view of the above, it is requested to take the necessary action accordingly to
strike down the name of this Association from the list of the associations
whose recognition has been lapsed as per the version of the concerned section.
If any re-verification of membership is required, it is requested that the same
may kindly be asked from the field formations 'on line' keeping in view that
the thrust of the present govt. is already on paperless work and salaries of
the govt. employees are already being prepared as well as sent electronically
direct to the accounts of the concerned individuals.
Thanking
you,
Yours faithfully,
(RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.
Copy
with the request for necessary action to:
The
Member (Admn.), CBEC, North Block, New Delhi.
(RAVI MALIK)
ALL
INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:
Address for communication:
Secretary General:
R. Chandramouli 240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001
(U.P.) Ravi Malik
Mob. 08939955463 mail
Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com,
Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in Mob.
09868816290
Vice
Presidents: P. Parwani, L. L. Singhvi (Central); AnuragChaudhary, Ravi
Joshi (North); N. Raman, G. Srinath (South); B. K. Sinha, AshwiniMajhi (East);
Rajesh Chaher, J. D. Patil (West) Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, J.
S. Aiyer (Central); R. K. Solanki, AshishVajpeyi (North); M. Nagaraju,
Ajithkumar P. C. (South); P. K. Sen, S. Bhattachariya (East); JasramMeena, M.
K. Mishra (West) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma
Treasurer:
N. R. MandaLiaison Secretary: A.
S. KunduCoordinator on Telangana: P.
Shravan Kumar
(Recognised
by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 45/D/17
Dt. 14.03.17
To,
Ms. Vanaja N. Sarna,
Member (Admn.), CBEC,
North Block, New Delhi.
Sub: Delay in processing of deputation applications.
Madam,
It is submitted with due regards
that the applications are being invited by the
CBEC for filling the
posts of Asstt. Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner in various SEZs and Asstt. Director/Deputy
Director in various Directorates from time to time but the time period to apply for the same is given very short, i.e., only 20 days.
2. It is further submitted that the applications of the interested
officers are not being processed timely on account of such a short period to
apply. This delay in processing of applications for deputation finally
results in non-forwarding of the applications of these officers as the processing of application
at every stage from division to Commissionerate
and then Commissionerate
to CCO consumes a lot of time and thereby, the applications are being disposed off with the remark that the last
date is over.
3. In view of the above, it is requested that the date in such cases may kindly be extended for two months and the concerned CCO may also be directed to forward the applications to the CBEC/competent authority invariably on time. It is also requested that the advance applications
may also kindly be duly considered in such cases.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
(RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.
Copy with
the request for necessary action to:
The Chief
Commissioner, Central Excise Bhopal Zone, Bhopal: It is also requested to
kindly forward such applications to the concerned authority even after the due
date, if the officers have applied timely. The concerned authority may kindly
decide the final fate of such applications.
(RAVI MALIK)
ALL
INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:
Address for communication:
Secretary General:
R. Chandramouli 240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001
(U.P.)
Ravi Malik
Mob. 08939955463 mail
Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com,
Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in Mob.
09868816290
Vice
Presidents: P. Parwani, L. L. Singhvi (Central); AnuragChaudhary, Ravi
Joshi (North); N. Raman, G. Srinath (South); B. K. Sinha, AshwiniMajhi (East);
Rajesh Chaher, J. D. Patil (West) Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, J.
S. Aiyer (Central); R. K. Solanki, AshishVajpeyi (North); M. Nagaraju,
Ajithkumar P. C. (South); P. K. Sen, S. Bhattachariya (East); JasramMeena, M.
K. Mishra (West) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma
Treasurer:
N. R. MandaLiaison Secretary: A.
S. KunduCoordinator on Telangana: P.
Shravan Kumar
(Recognised
by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 47/D/17
Dt. 14.03.17
To,
Ms. Vanaja N. Sarna,
Member (Admn.), CBEC,
North Block, New Delhi.
Sub: Vehicles for Range Offices.
Madam,
Kindly refer to the draft
vehicle policy placed on CBEC website and calling for comments.
2. It is submitted with due regards
that no provision has been
made for vehicle for Range Offices in the draft policy. No need to submit that the
Range offices attend various field activities including export ceiling, identification of defaulters, location of assets,
service of notices, verification of
premises for registration, issuance of installation certificates after due verifications etc.
3. The nature of job of the
Range Officers demands mobility on above account requiring independent mode of commuting at
short notice. Accordingly, one vehicle for every Range Office in addition to
the vehicle provided to Division office is very much
required. The kilometer ceiling should also be considerably higher (3000 Kms) for vehicles provided to Range
Office. It may kindly be appreciated that the vehicle is not a luxury but a necessity to enable a
Range Office perform official duties in efficient and independent manner.
4. In view of the above, it is requested that the provision may kindly be made of allotment of one vehicle for every Range Office in addition
to the vehicle provided to Division office.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
(RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.
ALL
INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:
Address for communication:
Secretary General:
R. Chandramouli 240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.)
Ravi Malik
Mob. 08939955463 mail
Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com,
Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in Mob.
09868816290
Vice
Presidents: P. Parwani, L. L. Singhvi (Central); AnuragChaudhary, Ravi
Joshi (North); N. Raman, G. Srinath (South); B. K. Sinha, AshwiniMajhi (East);
Rajesh Chaher, J. D. Patil (West) Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, J.
S. Aiyer (Central); R. K. Solanki, AshishVajpeyi (North); M. Nagaraju,
Ajithkumar P. C. (South); P. K. Sen, S. Bhattachariya (East); JasramMeena, M.
K. Mishra (West) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma
Treasurer:
N. R. MandaLiaison Secretary: A.
S. KunduCoordinator on Telangana: P.
Shravan Kumar
(Recognised
by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 48/NFU/17
Dt. 14.03.17
To,
Ms. Vanaja N. Sarna,
Member (Admn.), CBEC,
North Block, New Delhi.
Sub: Batch to batch Non Functional Financial Upgradation to
our officers to grant financial parity with the best placed counterparts of CSS
etc. on the lines of other Group ‘A’ cadres vs. IAS.
Madam,
Kindly refer to the letter F. No. 8/B/70/HRD (HRM)/2014 Dt.
16.01.14 and OM F. No.A-26017/154//2015-Ad.IIA Dt. 22.02.16 of CBEC.
2. It is
submitted with due regards that Central Excise Superintendents are retiring with single
promotion on a PB2 post in a career of 35-40 years whereas their common entry
counterparts of Customs, CBDT, CSS etc. are easily being promoted to PB4 levels
with 5-6 promotions. Central Excise Superintendents are also forced to work
under their extreme juniors of Customs (Examiners) belonging to one & same
cadre of Inspector and recruited through one & same process under one &
same organization of CBEC in one & same department of Revenue of one &
same Ministry of Finance with one & same administrative hierarchy. Examiner
of 1984 has already become Addl. Commissioner (GP-Rs. 8700/- in PB4) years ago
after getting 5 promotions whereas the Central Excise Inspector of 1984 is yet
to get IInd promotion to JTS post of Asstt. Commissioner (GP-Rs. 5400/- in
PB3). The counterparts of CSS including Rajya Sabha Secretariat and CBDT are
already reaching the level of Joint Secretary and Commissioner respectively in
the GP of Rs. 10000/- in PB4. Thus, the Central Excise Superintendents are getting salary even less than the pension of their
counterparts.
3. All organised group ‘A’ officers recruited with IAS, the best placed group ‘A’ service, in the
same pay scale through common entry have been granted financial parity
with counterparts of IAS in the form
of non-functional financial up-gradation (NFU) vide DOPT OM No.
AB.14017/64/2008-Estt.(RR) Dt. 24.04.09 to compensate lack of promotions as
compared to IAS. This scheme was introduced for group ‘A’ officers to
compensate financial loss in comparison to counterparts of IAS. Particularly
keeping in view the extraordinarily acute stagnation of Central Excise
Superintendents & Inspectors, a proposal for grant of non-functional
financial up-gradation to grant them financial parity with the counterparts of
CSS was approved and recommended to DOPT by the CBEC. But DOPT without going
into the merits returned the same simply saying that NFU was recommended only
for Group ‘A’ organized service by the VIth CPC.
4. As far as the group ‘B’ officers
are concerned, the CSS officers are the best placed group ‘B’ officers of Govt.
of India like IAS in group ‘A’. The group ‘B’ officers at the level of
Inspector of Central Excise and the Assistant of CSS are recruited in a common
scale of pay through common entry examination conducted by SSC. The
officers recruited as Assistant (Group-B, Non Gazetted) in the Ministries get
the benefit of promotions upto the Joint Secretary level, i.e., i) SO with GP
of Rs. 5400/- in PB3 after 4 years of service, ii) US (Grade-I) with GP of
Rs.6600/-, iii) DS with GP of Rs. 7600/-, iv) Director with GP of Rs. 8700/- in
PB-4 and v) JS with GP of Rs. 10000/-. We
have nothing against them and wish even more promotions for them. However,
their counterpart Inspectors of Central Excise in CBEC recruited as Group-B
(Non Gazetted) through the same All India competitive examination get only one
promotion in 35/40 years of service career.
5. The Assistants/Section Officers
are working in the headquarters offices on policy making seats whereas the
Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are working on more important
seats of revenue collection in the field formations. Despite of working on more
important seats, the Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are not
treated at par with the counterparts of CSS. These CSS counterparts are
retiring 4-5 grades above the officers recruited as the Inspector of Central
Excise. On account of this, the CSS counterparts are getting 60% more pay than
the officers recruited as Inspector of Central Excise.
6. The Assistants/Section Officers
are working in the headquarters offices on policy making seats whereas the
Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are working on more important
seats of revenue collection in the field formations. Despite of working on more
important seats, the Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise are not
treated at par with the counterparts of CSS. These CSS counterparts are
retiring 4-5 grades above the officers recruited as the Inspector of Central
Excise. On account of this, the CSS counterparts are getting 60% more pay than
the officers recruited as Inspector of Central Excise. Even the pension of CSS
counterparts is more than the salary of the officers recruited as Inspector of
Central Excise.
7. The group ‘A’ officers in the
Ministries are selected under Central Staffing Scheme on deputation basis from
organized Group ‘A’ Services or from CSS officers being promoted from the post
of Assistant/Section Officer but no such opportunity is available for the
Inspectors/Superintendents of Central Excise who are not only looking after the
work relating to collection of Central Excise duty but also
looking after the work of collection of
Customs duty (including Inland Air Travel Tax and Foreign Travel (Tax) and
Service Tax. Needless to submit that they are already earning the major portion
of the govt. revenues. It is also worth to submit that the Govt. of India has
regularly been earning the revenue far ahead of the revenue targets in r/o of
Central Excise duty, Customs duty and Service Tax particularly due to the
efficient, committed & effective efforts of the workforce in the form of
Central Excise Inspectors/Superintendents despite of their total
demoralisation, disappointment and job-dissatisfaction in r/o pay & perks,
career prospects and working conditions.
8. Above facts very well manifest
the injustice meted out to officers recruited as Central Excise Inspector
despite of the most important work of revenue collection being done by them for
govt. During this course, they have been facing every threat including life of
them as well as their families by the hard core criminals, smugglers and white
collared criminals alongwith tremendous administrative pressures. Thus, the
officers recruited as the Inspector of Central Excise deserve a far better
treatment in every aspect including pay, perks and career prospects. The grant
of the non-functional financial upgradation on batch to batch basis with the
common entry counterparts of CSS may really be a solace for these hard working
Central Excise officers.
9. As far as the importance of the
responsibilities is concerned, the Superintendents are discharging all
functions relating to assessment, investigation & intelligence, issuance of
Show Cause Notices with the powers of adjudication. They have not only been
conferred with the judicial powers in the matter of adjudication but also been
conferred with the judicial powers of recording statements of various persons
in terms of Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 108 of the
Customs Act, 1962. The statements tendered before the Central Excise
Superintendent have a legal binding and are treated as a valid piece of
evidence by various courts including the Hon’ble Supreme Court just like the
statements tendered before a Magistrate. Not
only it, the Adjudication Orders are also being prepared by them for the
Commissioner level officers. No such powers have been conferred to the CSS officers or
any other counterparts of Central Excise Superintendents/Inspectors. It is also
important to mention that the judicial officers are not only already being
highly paid with extra perks but also treated in a far better way in the matter
of career prospects than our Superintendents in our country.
10. Though the Central Excise
Superintendents are performing more responsible work functions as compared to
other common entry counterparts, yet they are facing the worst career prospects
instead of being given better treatment. This injustice is being faced by them
despite of being the ‘backbone of the government revenue’ on account of being
the major revenue collectors for the government in the form of Central Excise
duty, Customs duty and Service Tax and also GST in the forthcoming times. In
the actual terms, they are the ‘backbone of the government’ on account of being
responsible to earn the finance for the government. But very unfortunately,
they are being totally ignored in every matter.
11. The parity is the basic concept
of our Constitution and the parity in promotions is required to be maintained
amongst the similarly placed employees but the Government of India have not
initiated any action to maintain parity in promotions as well as pay packages
amongst the Group ‘B’ Gazetted and Non-Gazetted officers. The group ‘A’
officers have already been granted financial parity by the Government of India
by the grant of non-functional financial upgradation to other group ‘A’
officers at par with the counterparts of IAS. The grant of the batch to batch non-functional financial upgradation
after entry into group ‘B’ or equivalent grade is also the immediate need of
the time for all group ‘B’ officers to bring them at par at least financially
with the best placed group ‘B’ counterparts like CSS etc. The
Inspectors and Superintendents of Central Excise are being discriminated
despite of collecting the major portion of Government revenues and are not being
awarded due career prospects as well as appropriate pay packages.
12. No need to submit that the VIth as well as VIIth CPC has already
recommended to bring parity between the officers of headquarters offices and
field offices keeping in view the utmost importance of the work being done by
the field officers.
13. This NFU was also
recommended for our officers to the VIIth Pay Commission by the CBEC vide F.
No. 8/B/70/HRD (HRM)/2014 Dt. 16.01.14 but, unfortunately, the CPC kept mum on
the issue despite of being agreed in Jodhpur meeting.
14. It has again been
recommended by CBEC to the Revenue Hqrs for Central Excise Superintendents and
Inspectors vide OM F. No.A-26017/154//2015-Ad.IIA Dt. 22.02.16 after the
issuance of the 7th CPC report. But very unfortunately, nothing has
happened to the proposal till date.
15. In view of the above, it is
requested that the Central Excise Superintendents may also kindly be granted
non-functional financial up-gradation to grant them at least financial parity
with their best placed common entry counterparts of CSS etc. (recruited in the
same pay scale through common entry examination) after entry into Group ‘B’ or
equivalent grade on batch to batch basis enabling them to retire in PB4 like
their counterparts too. The proposal sent
already to the Revenue Hqrs vide
OM F. No.A-26017/154//2015-Ad.IIA Dt. 22.02.16 of CBEC may kindly, therefore, be pursued with the nodal department to
reach the finality. It is reiterated that the claim of the Central Excise Superintendents
becomes even stronger than other Group B counterparts on account of the
judicial powers granted to them to adjudicate the relevant cases and recording
statements like a Magistrate under Section 14 of Central Excise Act and Section
108 of Customs Act having validity even before the Supreme Court and also the
Adjudication Orders being prepared by them for the Commissioner level officers.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
(RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.
Copy with
the request for necessary action to:
(1) The
Chairman, CBEC, North Block, New Delhi.
(2) The
Revenue Secretary, North Block,
New Delhi.
(RAVI MALIK)
ALL
INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:
Address for communication:
Secretary General:
R. Chandramouli 240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001
(U.P.)
Ravi Malik
Mob. 08939955463 mail
Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com,
Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in Mob.
09868816290
Vice
Presidents: P. Parwani, L. L. Singhvi (Central); AnuragChaudhary, Ravi
Joshi (North); N. Raman, G. Srinath (South); B. K. Sinha, AshwiniMajhi (East);
Rajesh Chaher, J. D. Patil (West) Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, J.
S. Aiyer (Central); R. K. Solanki, AshishVajpeyi (North); M. Nagaraju,
Ajithkumar P. C. (South); P. K. Sen, S. Bhattachariya (East); JasramMeena, M.
K. Mishra (West) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma
Treasurer:
N. R. MandaLiaison Secretary: A.
S. KunduCoordinator on Telangana: P.
Shravan Kumar
(Recognised
by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 52/AIB/P/17
Dt. 16.03.17
To,
Ms. Vanaja Sarna,
Member (P&V), North
Block,
New Delhi.
Sub: Scheme to improve the career prospects of Central
Excise Superintendents/Inspectors as these officers are retiring with single
promotion in the service career of 35-40 years.
Madam,
It
is submitted with due regards that our
officers are retiring with single promotion on a PB2 post (Level-8) in a
career of 35-40 years after joining the
job as Inspector (Level-7) whereas our counterparts are easily attaining PB4
levels (Level-13 & above) with 5-6 promotions.
The Group ‘B’ Gazetted officers of ours join the job as Inspector (Group ‘B’
Non-Gazetted) and retire as Superintendent after getting only one promotion
during the entire service career barring 1% whereas other common entry
counterparts including Examiners (under same organization of CBEC in same cadre
of Inspector), CSS and CBDT under the
same Department of Revenue of same Ministry of Finance are getting 5 to 6 promotions upto the
level of Joint Secretary/Commissioner after being recruited
through one and the same process in the same grade. The matter was raised before the Cabinet Secretary and
he was pleased to recommend to the Cabinet to bring the measures to remove the
stagnation of our officers independent of cadre restructuring which was duly approved
by the Cabinet but no step has been taken till date even after expiry of more
than 3 years.
2. There is no change in the scenario regarding our career prospects
despite of the repeated requests and representations made to the
administration. Gross injustice is being done to our officers despite of being
instrumental with full dedication & commitment to collect the biggest
portion of Govt. revenues always above even redefined revenue targets. Temporary posts of Asstt.
Commissioner created in the cadre restructuring are also unable to undo the
injustice being done with our officers, that’s why the Cabinet approved to
bring measures independent of cadre restructuring on the issue of our
stagnation. These temporary posts will only enable to get around 4% of our
officers get JTS post without any right for further promotions.
3. Very unfortunately,
no measures have been taken till date to remove the stagnation of group ‘B’
executive officers in CBEC despite of the recommendations of
Cabinet/CRC/Cabinet Secretary. A
scheme is, therefore, required to be formulated on immediate basis enabling
Central Excise Superintendents and Inspectors also entered into PB4 levels (at
least a Grade Pay of Rs. 8700/-/Level-13) like the common entry counterparts of
CBDT, CSS, Customs etc. This can be done by introduction of flexible/dynamic promotion/complementing scheme. Flexible complementing promotion
scheme was introduced in the Department of Science & Technology to remove
stagnation of stagnated officers. Benefit of dynamic assured career progression
scheme has been given to Drivers in some departments.
4. Central Excise Superintendents/Inspectors are also forced
to work under their extreme juniors of Customs (Examiners) belonging to one
& the same cadre of Inspector and recruited through one & same process
under one & same organization of CBEC in one & same department of
Revenue of one & same Ministry of Finance with one & same
administrative hierarchy as well as same nature of job. Examiner of 1984 has
already become Addl. Commissioner (GP-Rs. 8700/- in PB4/Level-13) after getting
5 promotions whereas the Central Excise Inspector of 1984 is yet to get IInd
promotion to JTS post of Asstt. Commissioner (GP-Rs. 5400/- in PB3/Level-10).
We have nothing against any of our counterparts including Customs and wish them to get even more promotions but the discrimination being done to us should be undone by bringing at par
with them maintaining the relative seniority in accordance of the initial
recruitment without reverting back any of them. Instead, our officers may
kindly be brought at par with them by promoting to respective levels.
5. Thus, the
problem of acute stagnation existing in the cadre of Central Excise
Superintendent and Inspector can be solved, if a flexible complementary promotional
scheme (FCS) or dynamic assured career progression (DACP) scheme is introduced
for them after joining as Inspector. As per the recommendations of IVth CPC,
the flexible promotional scheme was introduced in the Department of Science and
Technology. The Vth CPC vide chapter 54 of its report made a number of
recommendations for modification of this scheme. The DOPT vide Notification No.
2/41/97-Plc, dated 9.11.98 made the regulation of in situ promotion under such
Flexible Promotional Scheme.
It has been further reviewed by the DOPT in the light of 6th CPC
recommendations and modified Flexible Complementing Scheme guidelines issued
vide OM No. AB/4017/37/2008-Esst(R) dated 10.09.10. FCS and MACPS both are also
applicable simultaneously in the case of these officers.
6.
In view of the above particularly considering
the extraordinarily acute stagnation of our officers, it is requested to
kindly bring the scheme accordingly to
enable our officers also attain PB4 levels (Level-13 & above) to grant-
(a) At least 5 in-situ promotions in uniform promotional
hierarchy of functional promotions across all Ministries/departments of Govt.
of India under flexible/dynamic promotion/complementing scheme (FCS or DACP) or
(b) In-situ promotions/non-functional upgradation on
completion of residency periods as prescribed by DOPT under OM No.
AB.14017/61/2008-Estt. (RR) Dt. 24.03.09 after joining as Inspector.
It is also worth to submit that
none of the above measures would require any functional post to be created.
Thanking
you,
Yours faithfully,
(RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.
Copy
with the request for necessary action to:
(1)
The Chairman, CBEC, North Block, New Delhi.
(2)
The Revenue Secretary, North Block, New Delhi.
(RAVI MALIK)
ALL
INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE
GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
President:
Address for communication:
Secretary General:
R. Chandramouli 240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001
(U.P.)
Ravi Malik
Mob. 08939955463 mail
Id:ravimalik_sweet@yahoo.com,
Site: cengoindia.blogspot.in Mob.
09868816290
Vice
Presidents: P. Parwani, L. L. Singhvi (Central); AnuragChaudhary, Ravi
Joshi (North); N. Raman, G. Srinath (South); B. K. Sinha, AshwiniMajhi (East);
Rajesh Chaher, J. D. Patil (West) Joint Secretaries: Anand Kishore, J.
S. Aiyer (Central); R. K. Solanki, AshishVajpeyi (North); M. Nagaraju,
Ajithkumar P. C. (South); P. K. Sen, S. Bhattachariya (East); JasramMeena, M.
K. Mishra (West) Office Secretary: C. S. Sharma
Treasurer:
N. R. MandaLiaison Secretary: A.
S. KunduCoordinator on Telangana: P.
Shravan Kumar
(Recognised
by G.O.I., Min. of Fin. vide letter F.No. B. 12017/10/2006-Ad.IV A Dt.21.01.08)
Ref. No. 53/AIB/P/17
Dt. 16.03.17
To,
Ms. Vanaja Sarna,
Member (P&V), North
Block,
New Delhi.
Sub: DPC for the post of Asstt. Commissioner.
Madam,
Kindly
refer to the Ref. No. 31/P/17 Dt. 28.02.17 and 39/P/17 Dt. 10.03.17of the
Association.
2. It is submitted with due regards that the promotions
have not been affected against the promotional quota in respect of regular/permanent
posts in the last DPC. Thus, 230+200+230+104=764 posts are to be added for
promotion of our officers against the promotional quota in respect of
regular/permanent posts for the forthcoming DPC for the year 2016-17.
3. It is further submitted that the DPC for the years
2014-15 and 2015-16 has been done for 1261 posts but promotion orders have been
issued merely for 844 officers in all. Thus, 417 (1261-844) posts are also to
be added for the forthcoming DPC.
4.
Final figure is again to be reached by also adding all retirements, VRS, demise
etc. against temporary posts. Accordingly, we have 1200+ posts of Asstt.
Commissioner in hands as on date.
5. It is also worth to submit that the
officers promoted against temporary posts have also not been moved upwards
against regular posts which is required to be done immediately. This will
increase the number of promotional posts at temporary level.
6.
In view of the above, it is requested that immediate steps may kindly be taken
to fill-up all vacant posts of Asstt. Commissioner by making upward movement
(against regular/permanent posts) of the officers promoted against temporary
posts to benefit the maximum number of our officers who are forced to retire
merely after single promotion in the career.
Thanking
you,
Yours faithfully,
(RAVI MALIK),
Secretary General.
Copy
with the request for necessary action to:
(1)
The Chairman, CBEC, North Block, New Delhi.
(2)
The Revenue Secretary, North Block, New Delhi.
(RAVI MALIK)
